mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 05:32:00 +00:00
IB/rdmavt: add missing locks in rvt_ruc_loopback
The documentation of the function rvt_error_qp says both r_lock and s_lock need to be held when calling that function. It also asserts using lockdep that both of those locks are held. rvt_error_qp is called form rvt_send_cq, which is called from rvt_qp_complete_swqe, which is called from rvt_send_complete, which is called from rvt_ruc_loopback in two places. Both of these places do not hold r_lock. Fix this by acquiring a spin_lock of r_lock in both of these places. The r_lock acquiring cannot be added in rvt_qp_complete_swqe because some of its other callers already have r_lock acquired. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220228195144.71946-1-dossche.niels@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Niels Dossche <dossche.niels@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f543a3e82b
commit
22cbc6c268
@ -2775,7 +2775,7 @@ void rvt_qp_iter(struct rvt_dev_info *rdi,
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rvt_qp_iter);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This should be called with s_lock held.
|
||||
* This should be called with s_lock and r_lock held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void rvt_send_complete(struct rvt_qp *qp, struct rvt_swqe *wqe,
|
||||
enum ib_wc_status status)
|
||||
@ -3134,7 +3134,9 @@ send_comp:
|
||||
rvp->n_loop_pkts++;
|
||||
flush_send:
|
||||
sqp->s_rnr_retry = sqp->s_rnr_retry_cnt;
|
||||
spin_lock(&sqp->r_lock);
|
||||
rvt_send_complete(sqp, wqe, send_status);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sqp->r_lock);
|
||||
if (local_ops) {
|
||||
atomic_dec(&sqp->local_ops_pending);
|
||||
local_ops = 0;
|
||||
@ -3188,7 +3190,9 @@ serr:
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qp->r_lock, flags);
|
||||
serr_no_r_lock:
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&sqp->s_lock, flags);
|
||||
spin_lock(&sqp->r_lock);
|
||||
rvt_send_complete(sqp, wqe, send_status);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&sqp->r_lock);
|
||||
if (sqp->ibqp.qp_type == IB_QPT_RC) {
|
||||
int lastwqe = rvt_error_qp(sqp, IB_WC_WR_FLUSH_ERR);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user