mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-25 21:51:40 +00:00
KVM: x86/cpuid: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures sizes at KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
With the help of xstate_get_guest_group_perm(), KVM can exclude unpermitted
xfeatures in cpuid.0xd.0.eax, in which case the corresponding xfeatures
sizes should also be matched to the permitted xfeatures.
To fix this inconsistency, the permitted_xcr0 and permitted_xss are defined
consistently, which implies 'supported' plus certain permissions for this
task, and it also fixes cpuid.0xd.1.ebx and later leaf-by-leaf queries.
Fixes: 445ecdf79b
("kvm: x86: Exclude unpermitted xfeatures at KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID")
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Message-Id: <20220125115223.33707-1-likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
35fe7cfbab
commit
1ffce0924a
@ -899,13 +899,14 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case 0xd: {
|
||||
u64 guest_perm = xstate_get_guest_group_perm();
|
||||
u64 permitted_xcr0 = supported_xcr0 & xstate_get_guest_group_perm();
|
||||
u64 permitted_xss = supported_xss;
|
||||
|
||||
entry->eax &= supported_xcr0 & guest_perm;
|
||||
entry->ebx = xstate_required_size(supported_xcr0, false);
|
||||
entry->eax &= permitted_xcr0;
|
||||
entry->ebx = xstate_required_size(permitted_xcr0, false);
|
||||
entry->ecx = entry->ebx;
|
||||
entry->edx &= (supported_xcr0 & guest_perm) >> 32;
|
||||
if (!supported_xcr0)
|
||||
entry->edx &= permitted_xcr0 >> 32;
|
||||
if (!permitted_xcr0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
entry = do_host_cpuid(array, function, 1);
|
||||
@ -914,20 +915,20 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
|
||||
|
||||
cpuid_entry_override(entry, CPUID_D_1_EAX);
|
||||
if (entry->eax & (F(XSAVES)|F(XSAVEC)))
|
||||
entry->ebx = xstate_required_size(supported_xcr0 | supported_xss,
|
||||
entry->ebx = xstate_required_size(permitted_xcr0 | permitted_xss,
|
||||
true);
|
||||
else {
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(supported_xss != 0);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(permitted_xss != 0);
|
||||
entry->ebx = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
entry->ecx &= supported_xss;
|
||||
entry->edx &= supported_xss >> 32;
|
||||
entry->ecx &= permitted_xss;
|
||||
entry->edx &= permitted_xss >> 32;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 2; i < 64; ++i) {
|
||||
bool s_state;
|
||||
if (supported_xcr0 & BIT_ULL(i))
|
||||
if (permitted_xcr0 & BIT_ULL(i))
|
||||
s_state = false;
|
||||
else if (supported_xss & BIT_ULL(i))
|
||||
else if (permitted_xss & BIT_ULL(i))
|
||||
s_state = true;
|
||||
else
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@ -941,7 +942,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
|
||||
* invalid sub-leafs. Only valid sub-leafs should
|
||||
* reach this point, and they should have a non-zero
|
||||
* save state size. Furthermore, check whether the
|
||||
* processor agrees with supported_xcr0/supported_xss
|
||||
* processor agrees with permitted_xcr0/permitted_xss
|
||||
* on whether this is an XCR0- or IA32_XSS-managed area.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry->eax || (entry->ecx & 0x1) != s_state)) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user