mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-27 05:11:48 +00:00
IB/uverbs: Allow uobject allocation to work concurrently with disassociate
After all the recent structural changes this is now straightforward, hold the hw_destroy_rwsem across the entire uobject creation. We already take this semaphore on the success path, so holding it a bit longer is not going to change the performance. After this change none of the create callbacks require the disassociate_srcu lock to be correct. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7452a3c745
commit
1e857e65d4
@ -153,9 +153,8 @@ static void assert_uverbs_usecnt(struct ib_uobject *uobj,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This must be called with the hw_destroy_rwsem locked (except for
|
||||
* RDMA_REMOVE_ABORT) for read or write, also The uobject itself must be
|
||||
* locked for write.
|
||||
* This must be called with the hw_destroy_rwsem locked for read or write,
|
||||
* also the uobject itself must be locked for write.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Upon return the HW object is guaranteed to be destroyed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -177,6 +176,7 @@ static int uverbs_destroy_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj,
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem);
|
||||
assert_uverbs_usecnt(uobj, UVERBS_LOOKUP_WRITE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (uobj->object) {
|
||||
@ -515,7 +515,22 @@ static struct ib_uobject *alloc_begin_fd_uobject(const struct uverbs_obj_type *t
|
||||
struct ib_uobject *rdma_alloc_begin_uobject(const struct uverbs_obj_type *type,
|
||||
struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return type->type_class->alloc_begin(type, ufile);
|
||||
struct ib_uobject *ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The hw_destroy_rwsem is held across the entire object creation and
|
||||
* released during rdma_alloc_commit_uobject or
|
||||
* rdma_alloc_abort_uobject
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!down_read_trylock(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem))
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = type->type_class->alloc_begin(type, ufile);
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(ret)) {
|
||||
up_read(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void alloc_abort_idr_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
|
||||
@ -637,17 +652,11 @@ int __must_check rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
|
||||
struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile = uobj->ufile;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Cleanup is running. Calling this should have been impossible */
|
||||
if (!down_read_trylock(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem)) {
|
||||
WARN(true, "ib_uverbs: Cleanup is running while allocating an uobject\n");
|
||||
uverbs_destroy_uobject(uobj, RDMA_REMOVE_ABORT);
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* alloc_commit consumes the uobj kref */
|
||||
ret = uobj->type->type_class->alloc_commit(uobj);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
uverbs_destroy_uobject(uobj, RDMA_REMOVE_ABORT);
|
||||
up_read(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -660,6 +669,7 @@ int __must_check rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
|
||||
/* matches atomic_set(-1) in alloc_uobj */
|
||||
atomic_set(&uobj->usecnt, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Matches the down_read in rdma_alloc_begin_uobject */
|
||||
up_read(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -671,8 +681,13 @@ int __must_check rdma_alloc_commit_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void rdma_alloc_abort_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ib_uverbs_file *ufile = uobj->ufile;
|
||||
|
||||
uobj->object = NULL;
|
||||
uverbs_destroy_uobject(uobj, RDMA_REMOVE_ABORT);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Matches the down_read in rdma_alloc_begin_uobject */
|
||||
up_read(&ufile->hw_destroy_rwsem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void lookup_put_idr_uobject(struct ib_uobject *uobj,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user