Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-24 21:21:41 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs/bpf: Add LRU internals description and graph

Browse Source 
Extend the bpf hashmap docs to include a brief description of the
internals of the LRU map type (setting appropriate API expectations),
including the original commit message from Martin and a variant on the
graph that I had presented during my Linux Plumbers Conference 2022
talk on "Pressure feedback for LRU map types"[0].

The node names in the dot file correspond roughly to the functions
where the logic for those decisions or steps is defined, to help
curious developers to cross-reference and update this logic if the
details of the LRU implementation ever differ from this description.

  [0] https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1368/

Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@isovalent.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230422172054.3355436-2-joe@isovalent.com
This commit is contained in:
Joe Stringer 2023-04-22 10:20:54 -07:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent af0335d292
commit 1a986518b8
2 changed files with 214 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
Documentation/bpf/map_hash.rst
View File

@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
.. Copyright (C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc.
.. Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Isovalent, Inc.
===============================================
BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, with PERCPU and LRU Variants
@ -215,3 +216,44 @@ Userspace walking the map elements from the map declared above:
cur_key = &next_key;
}
}
Internals
=========
This section of the document is targeted at Linux developers and describes
aspects of the map implementations that are not considered stable ABI. The
following details are subject to change in future versions of the kernel.
``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and variants
--------------------------------------
Updating elements in LRU maps may trigger eviction behaviour when the capacity
of the map is reached. There are various steps that the update algorithm
attempts in order to enforce the LRU property which have increasing impacts on
other CPUs involved in the following operation attempts:
- Attempt to use CPU-local state to batch operations
- Attempt to fetch free nodes from global lists
- Attempt to pull any node from a global list and remove it from the hashmap
- Attempt to pull any node from any CPU's list and remove it from the hashmap
This algorithm is described visually in the following diagram. See the
description in commit 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List") for a full explanation of
the corresponding operations:
.. kernel-figure:: map_lru_hash_update.dot
:alt: Diagram outlining the LRU eviction steps taken during map update.
LRU hash eviction during map update for ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_HASH`` and
variants. See the dot file source for kernel function name code references.
Map updates start from the oval in the top right "begin ``bpf_map_update()``"
and progress through the graph towards the bottom where the result may be
either a successful update or a failure with various error codes. The key in
the top right provides indicators for which locks may be involved in specific
operations. This is intended as a visual hint for reasoning about how map
contention may impact update operations, though the map type and flags may
impact the actual contention on those locks, based on the logic described in
the table above. For instance, if the map is created with type
``BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH`` and flags ``BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU`` then all map
properties would be per-cpu.

172
Documentation/bpf/map_lru_hash_update.dot Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
// Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Isovalent, Inc.
digraph {
node [colorscheme=accent4,style=filled] # Apply colorscheme to all nodes
graph [splines=ortho, nodesep=1]
subgraph cluster_key {
label = "Key\n(locks held during operation)";
rankdir = TB;
remote_lock [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=4,label="remote CPU LRU lock"]
hash_lock [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=3,label="hashtab lock"]
lru_lock [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=2,label="LRU lock"]
local_lock [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=1,label="local CPU LRU lock"]
no_lock [shape=rectangle,label="no locks held"]
}
begin [shape=oval,label="begin\nbpf_map_update()"]
// Nodes below with an 'fn_' prefix are roughly labeled by the C function
// names that initiate the corresponding logic in kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c.
// Number suffixes and errno suffixes handle subsections of the corresponding
// logic in the function as of the writing of this dot.
// cf. __local_list_pop_free() / bpf_percpu_lru_pop_free()
local_freelist_check [shape=diamond,fillcolor=1,
label="Local freelist\nnode available?"];
use_local_node [shape=rectangle,
label="Use node owned\nby this CPU"]
// cf. bpf_lru_pop_free()
common_lru_check [shape=diamond,
label="Map created with\ncommon LRU?\n(!BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU)"];
fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=2,
label="Flush local pending,
Rotate Global list, move
LOCAL_FREE_TARGET
from global -> local"]
// Also corresponds to:
// fn__local_list_flush()
// fn_bpf_lru_list_rotate()
fn___bpf_lru_node_move_to_free[shape=diamond,fillcolor=2,
label="Able to free\nLOCAL_FREE_TARGET\nnodes?"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=3,
label="Shrink inactive list
up to remaining
LOCAL_FREE_TARGET
(global LRU -> local)"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink [shape=diamond,fillcolor=2,
label="> 0 entries in\nlocal free list?"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink2 [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=2,
label="Steal one node from
inactive, or if empty,
from active global list"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink3 [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=3,
label="Try to remove\nnode from hashtab"]
local_freelist_check2 [shape=diamond,label="Htab removal\nsuccessful?"]
common_lru_check2 [shape=diamond,
label="Map created with\ncommon LRU?\n(!BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU)"];
subgraph cluster_remote_lock {
label = "Iterate through CPUs\n(start from current)";
style = dashed;
rankdir=LR;
local_freelist_check5 [shape=diamond,fillcolor=4,
label="Steal a node from\nper-cpu freelist?"]
local_freelist_check6 [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=4,
label="Steal a node from
(1) Unreferenced pending, or
(2) Any pending node"]
local_freelist_check7 [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=3,
label="Try to remove\nnode from hashtab"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem [shape=diamond,
label="Stole node\nfrom remote\nCPU?"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem2 [shape=diamond,label="Iterated\nall CPUs?"]
// Also corresponds to:
// use_local_node()
// fn__local_list_pop_pending()
}
fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local2 [shape=rectangle,
label="Use node that was\nnot recently referenced"]
local_freelist_check4 [shape=rectangle,
label="Use node that was\nactively referenced\nin global list"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOMEM [shape=oval,label="return -ENOMEM"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem3 [shape=rectangle,
label="Use node that was\nactively referenced\nin (another?) CPU's cache"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 [shape=rectangle,fillcolor=3,
label="Update hashmap\nwith new element"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem5 [shape=oval,label="return 0"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EBUSY [shape=oval,label="return -EBUSY"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EEXIST [shape=oval,label="return -EEXIST"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOENT [shape=oval,label="return -ENOENT"]
begin -> local_freelist_check
local_freelist_check -> use_local_node [xlabel="Y"]
local_freelist_check -> common_lru_check [xlabel="N"]
common_lru_check -> fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local [xlabel="Y"]
common_lru_check -> fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive [xlabel="N"]
fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local -> fn___bpf_lru_node_move_to_free
fn___bpf_lru_node_move_to_free ->
fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local2 [xlabel="Y"]
fn___bpf_lru_node_move_to_free ->
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive [xlabel="N"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive -> fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink -> fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local2 [xlabel = "Y"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink -> fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink2 [xlabel="N"]
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink2 -> fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink3
fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink3 -> local_freelist_check2
local_freelist_check2 -> local_freelist_check4 [xlabel = "Y"]
local_freelist_check2 -> common_lru_check2 [xlabel = "N"]
common_lru_check2 -> local_freelist_check5 [xlabel = "Y"]
common_lru_check2 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOMEM [xlabel = "N"]
local_freelist_check5 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem [xlabel = "Y"]
local_freelist_check5 -> local_freelist_check6 [xlabel = "N"]
local_freelist_check6 -> local_freelist_check7
local_freelist_check7 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem3 [xlabel = "Y"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem2 [xlabel = "N"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem2 ->
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOMEM [xlabel = "Y"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem2 -> local_freelist_check5 [xlabel = "N"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem3 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4
use_local_node -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4
fn_bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local2 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4
local_freelist_check4 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem5 [headlabel="Success"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 ->
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EBUSY [xlabel="Hashtab lock failed"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 ->
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EEXIST [xlabel="BPF_EXIST set and\nkey already exists"]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 ->
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOENT [headlabel="BPF_NOEXIST set\nand no such entry"]
// Create invisible pad nodes to line up various nodes
pad0 [style=invis]
pad1 [style=invis]
pad2 [style=invis]
pad3 [style=invis]
pad4 [style=invis]
// Line up the key with the top of the graph
no_lock -> local_lock [style=invis]
local_lock -> lru_lock [style=invis]
lru_lock -> hash_lock [style=invis]
hash_lock -> remote_lock [style=invis]
remote_lock -> local_freelist_check5 [style=invis]
remote_lock -> fn___bpf_lru_list_shrink [style=invis]
// Line up return code nodes at the bottom of the graph
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem -> pad0 [style=invis]
pad0 -> pad1 [style=invis]
pad1 -> pad2 [style=invis]
//pad2-> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOMEM [style=invis]
fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem4 -> pad3 [style=invis]
pad3 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem5 [style=invis]
pad3 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EBUSY [style=invis]
pad3 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_EEXIST [style=invis]
pad3 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem_ENOENT [style=invis]
// Reduce diagram width by forcing some nodes to appear above others
local_freelist_check4 -> fn_htab_lru_map_update_elem3 [style=invis]
common_lru_check2 -> pad4 [style=invis]
pad4 -> local_freelist_check5 [style=invis]
}