mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 20:22:09 +00:00
fs-writeback: Add helper function to start writeback if idle
ext4, at least, would like to start pushing on writeback if it starts to get close to ENOSPC when reserving worst-case blocks for delalloc writes. Writing out delalloc data will convert those worst-case predictions into usually smaller actual usage, freeing up space before we hit ENOSPC based on this speculation. Thanks to Jens for the suggestion for the helper function, & the naming help. I've made the helper return status on whether writeback was started even though I don't plan to use it in the ext4 patch; it seems like it would be potentially useful to test this in some cases. Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d3533d72e7
commit
17bd55d037
@ -1186,6 +1186,23 @@ void writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle - start writeback if none underway
|
||||
* @sb: the superblock
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Invoke writeback_inodes_sb if no writeback is currently underway.
|
||||
* Returns 1 if writeback was started, 0 if not.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(struct super_block *sb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!writeback_in_progress(sb->s_bdi)) {
|
||||
writeback_inodes_sb(sb);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* sync_inodes_sb - sync sb inode pages
|
||||
* @sb: the superblock
|
||||
|
@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct writeback_control {
|
||||
struct bdi_writeback;
|
||||
int inode_wait(void *);
|
||||
void writeback_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
|
||||
int writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle(struct super_block *);
|
||||
void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *);
|
||||
void writeback_inodes_wbc(struct writeback_control *wbc);
|
||||
long wb_do_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb, int force_wait);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user