From 1769ae83c8cb32166d1e208f7cefbf334085bd58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:56:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Reject set-tiling-ioctl with stride==0 and a tiling mode In commit 957870f93412 ("drm/i915: Split out i915_gem_object_set_tiling()"), I swapped an alignment check for IS_ALIGNED and in the process removed the less-than check. That check turns out to be important as it was the only rejection for stride == 0. Tvrtko did spot it, but I was overconfident in the IS_ALIGNED() conversion. Fixes: 957870f93412 ("drm/i915: Split out i915_gem_object_set_tiling()") Testcase: igt/gem_tiling_max_stride Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170203105652.27819-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin (cherry picked from commit 52da22e7aba155be238faff4f6e97b2eb9de64f3) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c index b1361cfd4c5c..974ac08df473 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_tiling.c @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ i915_tiling_ok(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, else tile_width = 512; - if (!IS_ALIGNED(stride, tile_width)) + if (!stride || !IS_ALIGNED(stride, tile_width)) return false; /* 965+ just needs multiples of tile width */