mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-29 07:31:29 +00:00
futex: Fix more put_pi_state() vs. exit_pi_state_list() races
Dmitry (through syzbot) reported being able to trigger the WARN in
get_pi_state() and a use-after-free on:
raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
Both are due to this race:
exit_pi_state_list() put_pi_state()
lock(&curr->pi_lock)
while() {
pi_state = list_first_entry(head);
hb = hash_futex(&pi_state->key);
unlock(&curr->pi_lock);
dec_and_test(&pi_state->refcount);
lock(&hb->lock)
lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock) // uaf if pi_state free'd
lock(&curr->pi_lock);
....
unlock(&curr->pi_lock);
get_pi_state(); // WARN; refcount==0
The problem is we take the reference count too late, and don't allow it
being 0. Fix it by using inc_not_zero() and simply retrying the loop
when we fail to get a refcount. In that case put_pi_state() should
remove the entry from the list.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: dvhart@infradead.org
Cc: syzbot <bot+2af19c9e1ffe4d4ee1d16c56ae7580feaee75765@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: c74aef2d06
("futex: Fix pi_state->owner serialization")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171031101853.xpfh72y643kdfhjs@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f479447d9
commit
153fbd1226
@ -903,11 +903,27 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
while (!list_empty(head)) {
|
||||
|
||||
next = head->next;
|
||||
pi_state = list_entry(next, struct futex_pi_state, list);
|
||||
key = pi_state->key;
|
||||
hb = hash_futex(&key);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can race against put_pi_state() removing itself from the
|
||||
* list (a waiter going away). put_pi_state() will first
|
||||
* decrement the reference count and then modify the list, so
|
||||
* its possible to see the list entry but fail this reference
|
||||
* acquire.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In that case; drop the locks to let put_pi_state() make
|
||||
* progress and retry the loop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&pi_state->refcount)) {
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
@ -918,8 +934,10 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
* task still owns the PI-state:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (head->next != next) {
|
||||
/* retain curr->pi_lock for the loop invariant */
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -927,9 +945,8 @@ void exit_pi_state_list(struct task_struct *curr)
|
||||
WARN_ON(list_empty(&pi_state->list));
|
||||
list_del_init(&pi_state->list);
|
||||
pi_state->owner = NULL;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&curr->pi_lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user