mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 12:11:40 +00:00
tick/common: Align tick period during sched_timer setup
The tick period is aligned very early while the first clock_event_device is
registered. At that point the system runs in periodic mode and switches
later to one-shot mode if possible.
The next wake-up event is programmed based on the aligned value
(tick_next_period) but the delta value, that is used to program the
clock_event_device, is computed based on ktime_get().
With the subtracted offset, the device fires earlier than the exact time
frame. With a large enough offset the system programs the timer for the
next wake-up and the remaining time left is too small to make any boot
progress. The system hangs.
Move the alignment later to the setup of tick_sched timer. At this point
the system switches to oneshot mode and a high resolution clocksource is
available. At this point it is safe to align tick_next_period because
ktime_get() will now return accurate (not jiffies based) time.
[bigeasy: Patch description + testing].
Fixes: e9523a0d81
("tick/common: Align tick period with the HZ tick.")
Reported-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Reported-by: "Bhatnagar, Rishabh" <risbhat@amazon.com>
Suggested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net>
Acked-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/5a56290d-806e-b9a5-f37c-f21958b5a8c0@grsecurity.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/12c6f9a3-d087-b824-0d05-0d18c9bc1bf3@amazon.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230615091830.RxMV2xf_@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
858fd168a9
commit
13bb06f8dd
@ -218,19 +218,8 @@ static void tick_setup_device(struct tick_device *td,
|
||||
* this cpu:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_BOOT) {
|
||||
ktime_t next_p;
|
||||
u32 rem;
|
||||
|
||||
tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
|
||||
|
||||
next_p = ktime_get();
|
||||
div_u64_rem(next_p, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
|
||||
if (rem) {
|
||||
next_p -= rem;
|
||||
next_p += TICK_NSEC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tick_next_period = next_p;
|
||||
tick_next_period = ktime_get();
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The boot CPU may be nohz_full, in which case set
|
||||
|
@ -161,8 +161,19 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void)
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
/* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */
|
||||
if (last_jiffies_update == 0)
|
||||
if (last_jiffies_update == 0) {
|
||||
u32 rem;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that the tick is aligned to a multiple of
|
||||
* TICK_NSEC.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
div_u64_rem(tick_next_period, TICK_NSEC, &rem);
|
||||
if (rem)
|
||||
tick_next_period += TICK_NSEC - rem;
|
||||
|
||||
last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period;
|
||||
}
|
||||
period = last_jiffies_update;
|
||||
write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user