mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-26 06:02:05 +00:00
net/sched: taprio: fix calculation of maximum gate durations
taprio_calculate_gate_durations() depends on netdev_get_num_tc() and
this returns 0. So it calculates the maximum gate durations for no
traffic class.
I had tested the blamed commit only with another patch in my tree, one
which in the end I decided isn't valuable enough to submit ("net/sched:
taprio: mask off bits in gate mask that exceed number of TCs").
The problem is that having this patch threw off my testing. By moving
the netdev_set_num_tc() call earlier, we implicitly gave to
taprio_calculate_gate_durations() the information it needed.
Extract only the portion from the unsubmitted change which applies the
mqprio configuration to the netdev earlier.
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20230130173145.475943-15-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com/
Fixes: a306a90c8f
("net/sched: taprio: calculate tc gate durations")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c078381856
commit
09dbdf28f9
@ -1833,23 +1833,6 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = parse_taprio_schedule(q, tb, new_admin, extack);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_admin->num_entries == 0) {
|
||||
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "There should be at least one entry in the schedule");
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = taprio_parse_clockid(sch, tb, extack);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
|
||||
taprio_set_picos_per_byte(dev, q);
|
||||
taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, new_admin, stab);
|
||||
|
||||
if (mqprio) {
|
||||
err = netdev_set_num_tc(dev, mqprio->num_tc);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
@ -1867,6 +1850,23 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
|
||||
mqprio->prio_tc_map[i]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = parse_taprio_schedule(q, tb, new_admin, extack);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_admin->num_entries == 0) {
|
||||
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "There should be at least one entry in the schedule");
|
||||
err = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = taprio_parse_clockid(sch, tb, extack);
|
||||
if (err < 0)
|
||||
goto free_sched;
|
||||
|
||||
taprio_set_picos_per_byte(dev, q);
|
||||
taprio_update_queue_max_sdu(q, new_admin, stab);
|
||||
|
||||
if (FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q->flags))
|
||||
err = taprio_enable_offload(dev, q, new_admin, extack);
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user