mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 12:42:02 +00:00
ARM: ux500: avoid warning in ux500_read_asicid
phys_addr_t may be 64 bit, which causes this harmless warning in ux500_read_asicid: arch/arm/mach-ux500/id.c: In function 'ux500_read_asicid': arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:159:19: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] #define IOMEM(x) ((void __force __iomem *)(x)) ^ arch/arm/mach-ux500/id.c:40:9: note: in expansion of macro 'readl' return readl(IOMEM(UX500_VIRT_ROM + (addr & 0xfff))); We can solve this in a nicer way by making UX500_VIRT_ROM have a proper type to start with and calculating the address using pointer arithmetic. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
19d3234124
commit
080e0435e5
@ -183,7 +183,7 @@
|
||||
#define U8500_IO_VIRTUAL 0xf0000000
|
||||
#define U8500_IO_PHYSICAL 0xa0000000
|
||||
/* This is where we map in the ROM to check ASIC IDs */
|
||||
#define UX500_VIRT_ROM 0xf0000000
|
||||
#define UX500_VIRT_ROM IOMEM(0xf0000000)
|
||||
|
||||
/* This macro is used in assembly, so no cast */
|
||||
#define IO_ADDRESS(x) \
|
||||
|
@ -21,11 +21,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
struct dbx500_asic_id dbx500_id;
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int ux500_read_asicid(phys_addr_t addr)
|
||||
static unsigned int __init ux500_read_asicid(phys_addr_t addr)
|
||||
{
|
||||
phys_addr_t base = addr & ~0xfff;
|
||||
struct map_desc desc = {
|
||||
.virtual = UX500_VIRT_ROM,
|
||||
.virtual = (unsigned long)UX500_VIRT_ROM,
|
||||
.pfn = __phys_to_pfn(base),
|
||||
.length = SZ_16K,
|
||||
.type = MT_DEVICE,
|
||||
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static unsigned int ux500_read_asicid(phys_addr_t addr)
|
||||
local_flush_tlb_all();
|
||||
flush_cache_all();
|
||||
|
||||
return readl(IOMEM(UX500_VIRT_ROM + (addr & 0xfff)));
|
||||
return readl(UX500_VIRT_ROM + (addr & 0xfff));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void ux500_print_soc_info(unsigned int asicid)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user