mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 04:02:20 +00:00
io-wq: write next_work before dropping acct_lock
Commit361aee450c
("io-wq: add intermediate work step between pending list and active work") closed a race between a cancellation and the work being removed from the wq for execution. To ensure the request is always reachable by the cancellation, we need to move it within the wq lock, which also synchronizes the cancellation. But commit42abc95f05
("io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock") replaced the wq lock here and accidentally reintroduced the race by releasing the acct_lock too early. In other words: worker | cancellation work = io_get_next_work() | raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock); | | | io_acct_cancel_pending_work | io_wq_worker_cancel() worker->next_work = work Using acct_lock is still enough since we synchronize on it on io_acct_cancel_pending_work. Fixes:42abc95f05
("io-wq: decouple work_list protection from the big wqe->lock") Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416021054.3940-2-krisman@suse.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c4ce0ab276
commit
068c27e32e
@ -564,10 +564,7 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_wq_acct *acct,
|
||||
* clear the stalled flag.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
work = io_get_next_work(acct, worker);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
|
||||
if (work) {
|
||||
__io_worker_busy(wq, worker);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure cancelation can find this, even before
|
||||
* it becomes the active work. That avoids a window
|
||||
@ -578,9 +575,15 @@ static void io_worker_handle_work(struct io_wq_acct *acct,
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&worker->lock);
|
||||
worker->next_work = work;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&worker->lock);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&acct->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!work)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
__io_worker_busy(wq, worker);
|
||||
|
||||
io_assign_current_work(worker, work);
|
||||
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user