mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-16 16:12:52 +00:00
perf/x86/intel: Mark initialization code as such
A few of the initialization functions are missing the __init annotation. Fix this and thereby allow ~680 additional bytes of code to be released after initialization. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1409071785-26015-1-git-send-email-minipli@googlemail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
70691d4a0b
commit
066ce64c7e
@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm(struct pt_regs *iregs)
|
||||
* BTS, PEBS probe and setup
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
void intel_ds_init(void)
|
||||
void __init intel_ds_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No support for 32bit formats
|
||||
|
@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static const int snb_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX] = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* core */
|
||||
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
|
||||
void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_nr = 4;
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_tos = MSR_LBR_TOS;
|
||||
@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* nehalem/westmere */
|
||||
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
|
||||
void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_nr = 16;
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_tos = MSR_LBR_TOS;
|
||||
@ -733,7 +733,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* sandy bridge */
|
||||
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
|
||||
void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_nr = 16;
|
||||
x86_pmu.lbr_tos = MSR_LBR_TOS;
|
||||
@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* atom */
|
||||
void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
|
||||
void __init intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* only models starting at stepping 10 seems
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user