mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-23 04:31:50 +00:00
btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()
[BUG] With current subpage RW support, the following script can hang the fs with 64K page size. # mkfs.btrfs -f -s 4k $dev # mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt # fsstress -w -n 50 -p 1 -s 1607749395 -d $mnt The kernel will do an infinite loop in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(). [CAUSE] In btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() we: - Truncate page cache range - Lock extent io tree - Wait any ordered extents in the range. We exit the loop until we meet all the following conditions: - No ordered extent in the lock range - No page is in the lock range The latter condition has a pitfall, it only works for sector size == PAGE_SIZE case. While can't handle the following subpage case: 0 32K 64K 96K 128K | |///////||//////| || lockstart=32K lockend=96K - 1 In this case, although the range crosses 2 pages, truncate_pagecache_range() will invalidate no page at all, but only zero the [32K, 96K) range of the two pages. Thus filemap_range_has_page(32K, 96K-1) will always return true, thus we will never meet the loop exit condition. [FIX] Fix the problem by doing page alignment for the lock range. Function filemap_range_has_page() has already handled lend < lstart case, we only need to round up @lockstart, and round_down @lockend for truncate_pagecache_range(). This modification should not change any thing for sector size == PAGE_SIZE case, as in that case our range is already page aligned. Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> # [ppc64] Tested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> # [aarch64] Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3115deb381
commit
0528476b6a
@ -2486,6 +2486,17 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(struct inode *inode,
|
||||
const u64 lockend,
|
||||
struct extent_state **cached_state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For subpage case, if the range is not at page boundary, we could
|
||||
* have pages at the leading/tailing part of the range.
|
||||
* This could lead to dead loop since filemap_range_has_page()
|
||||
* will always return true.
|
||||
* So here we need to do extra page alignment for
|
||||
* filemap_range_has_page().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const u64 page_lockstart = round_up(lockstart, PAGE_SIZE);
|
||||
const u64 page_lockend = round_down(lockend + 1, PAGE_SIZE) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
@ -2506,7 +2517,7 @@ static int btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(struct inode *inode,
|
||||
(ordered->file_offset + ordered->num_bytes <= lockstart ||
|
||||
ordered->file_offset > lockend)) &&
|
||||
!filemap_range_has_page(inode->i_mapping,
|
||||
lockstart, lockend)) {
|
||||
page_lockstart, page_lockend)) {
|
||||
if (ordered)
|
||||
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user