mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-21 19:41:42 +00:00
fs: nfs: fix missing refcnt by replacing folio_set_private by folio_attach_private
This patch is inspired by a code review of fs codes which aims at folio's extra refcnt that could introduce unwanted behavious when judging refcnt, such as[1].That is, the folio passed to mapping_evict_folio carries the refcnts from find_lock_entries, page_cache, corresponding to PTEs and folio's private if has. However, current code doesn't take the refcnt for folio's private which could have mapping_evict_folio miss the one to only PTE and lead to call filemap_release_folio wrongly. [1] long mapping_evict_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio) { ... //current code will misjudge here if there is one pte on the folio which is be deemed as the one as folio's private if (folio_ref_count(folio) > folio_nr_pages(folio) + folio_has_private(folio) + 1) return 0; if (!filemap_release_folio(folio, 0)) return 0; return remove_mapping(mapping, folio); } Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
40c80881eb
commit
03e02b9417
@ -772,8 +772,7 @@ static void nfs_inode_add_request(struct nfs_page *req)
|
||||
nfs_lock_request(req);
|
||||
spin_lock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
|
||||
set_bit(PG_MAPPED, &req->wb_flags);
|
||||
folio_set_private(folio);
|
||||
folio->private = req;
|
||||
folio_attach_private(folio, req);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
|
||||
atomic_long_inc(&nfsi->nrequests);
|
||||
/* this a head request for a page group - mark it as having an
|
||||
@ -797,8 +796,7 @@ static void nfs_inode_remove_request(struct nfs_page *req)
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
|
||||
if (likely(folio)) {
|
||||
folio->private = NULL;
|
||||
folio_clear_private(folio);
|
||||
folio_detach_private(folio);
|
||||
clear_bit(PG_MAPPED, &req->wb_head->wb_flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&mapping->i_private_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user