mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-22 20:22:09 +00:00
powerpc/io: Avoid clang null pointer arithmetic warnings
With -Wextra clang warns about pointer arithmetic using a null pointer. When building with CONFIG_PCI=n, that triggers a warning in the IO accessors, eg: In file included from linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:672: linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io-defs.h:23:1: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 23 | DEF_PCI_AC_RET(inb, u8, (unsigned long port), (port), pio, port) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... linux/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h:591:53: note: expanded from macro '__do_inb' 591 | #define __do_inb(port) readb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE + port); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ That is because when CONFIG_PCI=n, _IO_BASE is defined as 0. Although _IO_BASE is defined as plain 0, the cast (PCI_IO_ADDR) converts it to void * before the addition with port happens. Instead the addition can be done first, and then the cast. The resulting value will be the same, but avoids the warning, and also avoids void pointer arithmetic which is apparently non-standard. Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYtEh8zmq8k8wE-8RZwW-Qr927RLTn+KqGnq1F=ptaaNsA@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://msgid.link/20240503075619.394467-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
This commit is contained in:
parent
61688a82e0
commit
03c0f2c2b2
@ -585,12 +585,12 @@ __do_out_asm(_rec_outl, "stwbrx")
|
||||
#define __do_inw(port) _rec_inw(port)
|
||||
#define __do_inl(port) _rec_inl(port)
|
||||
#else /* CONFIG_PPC32 */
|
||||
#define __do_outb(val, port) writeb(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+port);
|
||||
#define __do_outw(val, port) writew(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+port);
|
||||
#define __do_outl(val, port) writel(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+port);
|
||||
#define __do_inb(port) readb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE + port);
|
||||
#define __do_inw(port) readw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE + port);
|
||||
#define __do_inl(port) readl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE + port);
|
||||
#define __do_outb(val, port) writeb(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+port));
|
||||
#define __do_outw(val, port) writew(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+port));
|
||||
#define __do_outl(val, port) writel(val,(PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+port));
|
||||
#define __do_inb(port) readb((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE + port));
|
||||
#define __do_inw(port) readw((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE + port));
|
||||
#define __do_inl(port) readl((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE + port));
|
||||
#endif /* !CONFIG_PPC32 */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_EEH
|
||||
@ -606,12 +606,12 @@ __do_out_asm(_rec_outl, "stwbrx")
|
||||
#define __do_writesw(a, b, n) _outsw(PCI_FIX_ADDR(a),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_writesl(a, b, n) _outsl(PCI_FIX_ADDR(a),(b),(n))
|
||||
|
||||
#define __do_insb(p, b, n) readsb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)_IO_BASE+(p),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_insb(p, b, n) readsb((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_insw(p, b, n) readsw((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_insl(p, b, n) readsl((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)), (b), (n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsb(p, b, n) writesb((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsw(p, b, n) writesw((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)),(b),(n))
|
||||
#define __do_outsl(p, b, n) writesl((PCI_IO_ADDR)(_IO_BASE+(p)),(b),(n))
|
||||
|
||||
#define __do_memset_io(addr, c, n) \
|
||||
_memset_io(PCI_FIX_ADDR(addr), c, n)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user