2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
menu "DCCP CCIDs Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP && EXPERIMENTAL
|
|
|
|
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_CCID2
|
2006-03-21 03:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
tristate "CCID2 (TCP-Like) (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP
|
2006-03-21 03:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
def_tristate IP_DCCP
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
select IP_DCCP_ACKVEC
|
|
|
|
---help---
|
|
|
|
CCID 2, TCP-like Congestion Control, denotes Additive Increase,
|
|
|
|
Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control with behavior
|
|
|
|
modelled directly on TCP, including congestion window, slow start,
|
|
|
|
timeouts, and so forth [RFC 2581]. CCID 2 achieves maximum
|
|
|
|
bandwidth over the long term, consistent with the use of end-to-end
|
|
|
|
congestion control, but halves its congestion window in response to
|
|
|
|
each congestion event. This leads to the abrupt rate changes
|
|
|
|
typical of TCP. Applications should use CCID 2 if they prefer
|
|
|
|
maximum bandwidth utilization to steadiness of rate. This is often
|
|
|
|
the case for applications that are not playing their data directly
|
|
|
|
to the user. For example, a hypothetical application that
|
|
|
|
transferred files over DCCP, using application-level retransmissions
|
|
|
|
for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may
|
2007-11-21 12:09:56 +00:00
|
|
|
also prefer CCID 2. See RFC 4341 for further details.
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2007-11-21 12:09:56 +00:00
|
|
|
CCID2 is the default CCID used by DCCP.
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-09-19 20:12:44 +00:00
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_CCID2_DEBUG
|
2006-11-20 20:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
bool "CCID2 debugging messages"
|
2006-09-19 20:12:44 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID2
|
|
|
|
---help---
|
2006-11-20 20:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
Enable CCID2-specific debugging messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When compiling CCID2 as a module, this debugging output can
|
|
|
|
additionally be toggled by setting the ccid2_debug module
|
|
|
|
parameter to 0 or 1.
|
2006-09-19 20:12:44 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If in doubt, say N.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
2006-03-21 03:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
tristate "CCID3 (TCP-Friendly) (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP
|
2006-03-21 03:24:22 +00:00
|
|
|
def_tristate IP_DCCP
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
---help---
|
|
|
|
CCID 3 denotes TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC), an equation-based
|
|
|
|
rate-controlled congestion control mechanism. TFRC is designed to
|
|
|
|
be reasonably fair when competing for bandwidth with TCP-like flows,
|
|
|
|
where a flow is "reasonably fair" if its sending rate is generally
|
|
|
|
within a factor of two of the sending rate of a TCP flow under the
|
|
|
|
same conditions. However, TFRC has a much lower variation of
|
|
|
|
throughput over time compared with TCP, which makes CCID 3 more
|
|
|
|
suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a
|
|
|
|
relatively smooth sending rate is of importance.
|
|
|
|
|
2006-10-24 23:17:51 +00:00
|
|
|
CCID 3 is further described in RFC 4342,
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4342.txt
|
2006-03-21 01:41:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in
|
|
|
|
RFC 3448.
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-24 23:17:51 +00:00
|
|
|
This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.2),
|
|
|
|
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-11-20 20:26:03 +00:00
|
|
|
To compile this CCID as a module, choose M here: the module will be
|
|
|
|
called dccp_ccid3.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
If in doubt, say M.
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-28 02:50:46 +00:00
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_TFRC_LIB
|
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
|
|
|
def_tristate IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
|
|
|
|
2006-11-20 20:28:09 +00:00
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_CCID3_DEBUG
|
|
|
|
bool "CCID3 debugging messages"
|
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
|
|
|
---help---
|
|
|
|
Enable CCID3-specific debugging messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When compiling CCID3 as a module, this debugging output can
|
|
|
|
additionally be toggled by setting the ccid3_debug module
|
|
|
|
parameter to 0 or 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If in doubt, say N.
|
2006-12-03 16:50:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
config IP_DCCP_CCID3_RTO
|
|
|
|
int "Use higher bound for nofeedback timer"
|
|
|
|
default 100
|
|
|
|
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3 && EXPERIMENTAL
|
|
|
|
---help---
|
|
|
|
Use higher lower bound for nofeedback timer expiration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The TFRC nofeedback timer normally expires after the maximum of 4
|
|
|
|
RTTs and twice the current send interval (RFC 3448, 4.3). On LANs
|
|
|
|
with a small RTT this can mean a high processing load and reduced
|
|
|
|
performance, since then the nofeedback timer is triggered very
|
|
|
|
frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This option enables to set a higher lower bound for the nofeedback
|
|
|
|
value. Values in units of milliseconds can be set here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A value of 0 disables this feature by enforcing the value specified
|
|
|
|
in RFC 3448. The following values have been suggested as bounds for
|
|
|
|
experimental use:
|
|
|
|
* 16-20ms to match the typical multimedia inter-frame interval
|
|
|
|
* 100ms as a reasonable compromise [default]
|
|
|
|
* 1000ms corresponds to the lower TCP RTO bound (RFC 2988, 2.4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The default of 100ms is a compromise between a large value for
|
|
|
|
efficient DCCP implementations, and a small value to avoid disrupting
|
|
|
|
the network in times of congestion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purpose of the nofeedback timer is to slow DCCP down when there
|
|
|
|
is serious network congestion: experimenting with larger values should
|
|
|
|
therefore not be performed on WANs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-08-10 03:14:34 +00:00
|
|
|
endmenu
|