linux/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h

108 lines
2.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

#ifndef __ASM_PREEMPT_H
#define __ASM_PREEMPT_H
#include <asm/rmwcc.h>
#include <asm/percpu.h>
#include <linux/thread_info.h>
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count);
/*
* We use the PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED bit as an inverted NEED_RESCHED such
* that a decrement hitting 0 means we can and should reschedule.
*/
#define PREEMPT_ENABLED (0 + PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED)
/*
* We mask the PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED bit so as not to confuse all current users
* that think a non-zero value indicates we cannot preempt.
*/
static __always_inline int preempt_count(void)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
return raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED;
}
static __always_inline void preempt_count_set(int pc)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
raw_cpu_write_4(__preempt_count, pc);
}
/*
* must be macros to avoid header recursion hell
*/
#define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { \
task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = PREEMPT_DISABLED; \
} while (0)
#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) do { \
task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = PREEMPT_ENABLED; \
per_cpu(__preempt_count, (cpu)) = PREEMPT_ENABLED; \
} while (0)
/*
* We fold the NEED_RESCHED bit into the preempt count such that
* preempt_enable() can decrement and test for needing to reschedule with a
* single instruction.
*
* We invert the actual bit, so that when the decrement hits 0 we know we both
* need to resched (the bit is cleared) and can resched (no preempt count).
*/
static __always_inline void set_preempt_need_resched(void)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
raw_cpu_and_4(__preempt_count, ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
}
static __always_inline void clear_preempt_need_resched(void)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
raw_cpu_or_4(__preempt_count, PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
}
static __always_inline bool test_preempt_need_resched(void)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
return !(raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) & PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED);
}
/*
* The various preempt_count add/sub methods
*/
static __always_inline void __preempt_count_add(int val)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, val);
}
static __always_inline void __preempt_count_sub(int val)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
raw_cpu_add_4(__preempt_count, -val);
}
/*
* Because we keep PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED set when we do _not_ need to reschedule
* a decrement which hits zero means we have no preempt_count and should
* reschedule.
*/
static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
{
GEN_UNARY_RMWcc("decl", __preempt_count, __percpu_arg(0), "e");
}
/*
* Returns true when we need to resched and can (barring IRQ state).
*/
static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
{
percpu: add raw_cpu_ops The kernel has never been audited to ensure that this_cpu operations are consistently used throughout the kernel. The code generated in many places can be improved through the use of this_cpu operations (which uses a segment register for relocation of per cpu offsets instead of performing address calculations). The patch set also addresses various consistency issues in general with the per cpu macros. A. The semantics of __this_cpu_ptr() differs from this_cpu_ptr only because checks are skipped. This is typically shown through a raw_ prefix. So this patch set changes the places where __this_cpu_ptr() is used to raw_cpu_ptr(). B. There has been the long term wish by some that __this_cpu operations would check for preemption. However, there are cases where preemption checks need to be skipped. This patch set adds raw_cpu operations that do not check for preemption and then adds preemption checks to the __this_cpu operations. C. The use of __get_cpu_var is always a reference to a percpu variable that can also be handled via a this_cpu operation. This patch set replaces all uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu operations. D. We can then use this_cpu RMW operations in various places replacing sequences of instructions by a single one. E. The use of this_cpu operations throughout will allow other arches than x86 to implement optimized references and RMV operations to work with per cpu local data. F. The use of this_cpu operations opens up the possibility to further optimize code that relies on synchronization through per cpu data. The patch set works in a couple of stages: I. Patch 1 adds the additional raw_cpu operations and raw_cpu_ptr(). Also converts the existing __this_cpu_xx_# primitive in the x86 code to raw_cpu_xx_#. II. Patch 2-4 use the raw_cpu operations in places that would give us false positives once they are enabled. III. Patch 5 adds preemption checks to __this_cpu operations to allow checking if preemption is properly disabled when these functions are used. IV. Patches 6-20 are patches that simply replace uses of __get_cpu_var with this_cpu_ptr. They do not depend on any changes to the percpu code. No preemption tests are skipped if they are applied. V. Patches 21-46 are conversion patches that use this_cpu operations in various kernel subsystems/drivers or arch code. VI. Patches 47/48 (not included in this series) remove no longer used functions (__this_cpu_ptr and __get_cpu_var). These should only be applied after all the conversion patches have made it and after we have done additional passes through the kernel to ensure that none of the uses of these functions remain. This patch (of 46): The patches following this one will add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops so we need to have an alternative way to use this_cpu operations without preemption checks. raw_cpu_ops will be the basis for all other ops since these will be the operations that do not implement any checks. Primitive operations are renamed by this patch from __this_cpu_xxx to raw_cpu_xxxx. Also change the uses of the x86 percpu primitives in preempt.h. These depend directly on asm/percpu.h (header #include nesting issue). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com> Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com> Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Cc: Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-07 22:39:34 +00:00
return unlikely(!raw_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
extern asmlinkage void ___preempt_schedule(void);
# define __preempt_schedule() asm ("call ___preempt_schedule")
extern asmlinkage void preempt_schedule(void);
extern asmlinkage void ___preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
# define __preempt_schedule_notrace() asm ("call ___preempt_schedule_notrace")
extern asmlinkage void preempt_schedule_notrace(void);
#endif
#endif /* __ASM_PREEMPT_H */