2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2008 Intel Corporation
|
|
|
|
* Author: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Distributed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* This file implements counting semaphores.
|
|
|
|
* A counting semaphore may be acquired 'n' times before sleeping.
|
|
|
|
* See mutex.c for single-acquisition sleeping locks which enforce
|
|
|
|
* rules which allow code to be debugged more easily.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Some notes on the implementation:
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The spinlock controls access to the other members of the semaphore.
|
|
|
|
* down_trylock() and up() can be called from interrupt context, so we
|
|
|
|
* have to disable interrupts when taking the lock. It turns out various
|
|
|
|
* parts of the kernel expect to be able to use down() on a semaphore in
|
|
|
|
* interrupt context when they know it will succeed, so we have to use
|
|
|
|
* irqsave variants for down(), down_interruptible() and down_killable()
|
|
|
|
* too.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* The ->count variable represents how many more tasks can acquire this
|
|
|
|
* semaphore. If it's zero, there may be tasks waiting on the wait_list.
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/compiler.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/semaphore.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
2008-05-12 19:21:15 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static noinline void __down(struct semaphore *sem);
|
|
|
|
static noinline int __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem);
|
2008-03-14 17:19:33 +00:00
|
|
|
static noinline int __down_killable(struct semaphore *sem);
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
static noinline int __down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long jiffies);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
static noinline void __up(struct semaphore *sem);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* down - acquire the semaphore
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to be acquired
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Acquires the semaphore. If no more tasks are allowed to acquire the
|
|
|
|
* semaphore, calling this function will put the task to sleep until the
|
|
|
|
* semaphore is released.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Use of this function is deprecated, please use down_interruptible() or
|
|
|
|
* down_killable() instead.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
void down(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
|
|
|
|
sem->count--;
|
|
|
|
else
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
__down(sem);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* down_interruptible - acquire the semaphore unless interrupted
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to be acquired
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Attempts to acquire the semaphore. If no more tasks are allowed to
|
|
|
|
* acquire the semaphore, calling this function will put the task to sleep.
|
|
|
|
* If the sleep is interrupted by a signal, this function will return -EINTR.
|
|
|
|
* If the semaphore is successfully acquired, this function returns 0.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
int down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
int result = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
|
semaphore: fix
Yanmin Zhang reported:
| Comparing with kernel 2.6.25, AIM7 (use tmpfs) has more th
| regression under 2.6.26-rc1 on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton,
| and Itanium Montecito. Bisect located the patch below:
|
| 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff is first bad commit
| commit 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff
| Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
| Date: Fri Mar 7 21:55:58 2008 -0500
|
| Generic semaphore implementation
|
| After I manually reverted the patch against 2.6.26-rc1 while fixing
| lots of conflicts/errors, aim7 regression became less than 2%.
i reproduced the AIM7 workload and can confirm Yanmin's findings that
-.26-rc1 regresses over .25 - by over 67% here.
Looking at the workload i found and fixed what i believe to be the real
bug causing the AIM7 regression: it was inefficient wakeup / scheduling
/ locking behavior of the new generic semaphore code, causing suboptimal
performance.
The problem comes from the following code. The new semaphore code does
this on down():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
sem->count--;
else
__down(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
and this on up():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
sem->count++;
else
__up(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
where __up() does:
list_del(&waiter->list);
waiter->up = 1;
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
and where __down() does this in essence:
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
waiter.up = 0;
for (;;) {
[...]
spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
if (waiter.up)
return 0;
}
the fastpath looks good and obvious, but note the following property of
the contended path: if there's a task on the ->wait_list, the up() of
the current owner will "pass over" ownership to that waiting task, in a
wake-one manner, via the waiter->up flag and by removing the waiter from
the wait list.
That is all and fine in principle, but as implemented in
kernel/semaphore.c it also creates a nasty, hidden source of contention!
The contention comes from the following property of the new semaphore
code: the new owner owns the semaphore exclusively, even if it is not
running yet.
So if the old owner, even if just a few instructions later, does a
down() [lock_kernel()] again, it will be blocked and will have to wait
on the new owner to eventually be scheduled (possibly on another CPU)!
Or if another task gets to lock_kernel() sooner than the "new owner"
scheduled, it will be blocked unnecessarily and for a very long time
when there are 2000 tasks running.
I.e. the implementation of the new semaphores code does wake-one and
lock ownership in a very restrictive way - it does not allow
opportunistic re-locking of the lock at all and keeps the scheduler from
picking task order intelligently.
This kind of scheduling, with 2000 AIM7 processes running, creates awful
cross-scheduling between those 2000 tasks, causes reduced parallelism, a
throttled runqueue length and a lot of idle time. With increasing number
of CPUs it causes an exponentially worse behavior in AIM7, as the chance
for a newly woken new-owner task to actually run anytime soon is less
and less likely.
Note that it takes just a tiny bit of contention for the 'new-semaphore
catastrophy' to happen: the wakeup latencies get added to whatever small
contention there is, and quickly snowball out of control!
I believe Yanmin's findings and numbers support this analysis too.
The best fix for this problem is to use the same scheduling logic that
the kernel/mutex.c code uses: keep the wake-one behavior (that is OK and
wanted because we do not want to over-schedule), but also allow
opportunistic locking of the lock even if a wakee is already "in
flight".
The patch below implements this new logic. With this patch applied the
AIM7 regression is largely fixed on my quad testbox:
# v2.6.25 vanilla:
..................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 56096.4 91 207.5 789.7 0.4675
2000 55894.4 94 208.2 792.7 0.4658
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 vanilla:
...................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 33230.6 83 350.3 784.5 0.2769
2000 31778.1 86 366.3 783.6 0.2648
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 + semaphore-speedup:
...............................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 55707.1 92 209.0 795.6 0.4642
2000 55704.4 96 209.0 796.0 0.4642
i.e. a 67% speedup. We are now back to within 1% of the v2.6.25
performance levels and have zero idle time during the test, as expected.
Btw., interactivity also improved dramatically with the fix - for
example console-switching became almost instantaneous during this
workload (which after all is running 2000 tasks at once!), without the
patch it was stuck for a minute at times.
There's another nice side-effect of this speedup patch, the new generic
semaphore code got even smaller:
text data bss dec hex filename
1241 0 0 1241 4d9 semaphore.o.before
1207 0 0 1207 4b7 semaphore.o.after
(because the waiter.up complication got removed.)
Longer-term we should look into using the mutex code for the generic
semaphore code as well - but i's not easy due to legacies and it's
outside of the scope of v2.6.26 and outside the scope of this patch as
well.
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-08 09:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
sem->count--;
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
result = __down_interruptible(sem);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_interruptible);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* down_killable - acquire the semaphore unless killed
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to be acquired
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Attempts to acquire the semaphore. If no more tasks are allowed to
|
|
|
|
* acquire the semaphore, calling this function will put the task to sleep.
|
|
|
|
* If the sleep is interrupted by a fatal signal, this function will return
|
|
|
|
* -EINTR. If the semaphore is successfully acquired, this function returns
|
|
|
|
* 0.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-14 17:19:33 +00:00
|
|
|
int down_killable(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
int result = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
|
semaphore: fix
Yanmin Zhang reported:
| Comparing with kernel 2.6.25, AIM7 (use tmpfs) has more th
| regression under 2.6.26-rc1 on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton,
| and Itanium Montecito. Bisect located the patch below:
|
| 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff is first bad commit
| commit 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff
| Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
| Date: Fri Mar 7 21:55:58 2008 -0500
|
| Generic semaphore implementation
|
| After I manually reverted the patch against 2.6.26-rc1 while fixing
| lots of conflicts/errors, aim7 regression became less than 2%.
i reproduced the AIM7 workload and can confirm Yanmin's findings that
-.26-rc1 regresses over .25 - by over 67% here.
Looking at the workload i found and fixed what i believe to be the real
bug causing the AIM7 regression: it was inefficient wakeup / scheduling
/ locking behavior of the new generic semaphore code, causing suboptimal
performance.
The problem comes from the following code. The new semaphore code does
this on down():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
sem->count--;
else
__down(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
and this on up():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
sem->count++;
else
__up(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
where __up() does:
list_del(&waiter->list);
waiter->up = 1;
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
and where __down() does this in essence:
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
waiter.up = 0;
for (;;) {
[...]
spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
if (waiter.up)
return 0;
}
the fastpath looks good and obvious, but note the following property of
the contended path: if there's a task on the ->wait_list, the up() of
the current owner will "pass over" ownership to that waiting task, in a
wake-one manner, via the waiter->up flag and by removing the waiter from
the wait list.
That is all and fine in principle, but as implemented in
kernel/semaphore.c it also creates a nasty, hidden source of contention!
The contention comes from the following property of the new semaphore
code: the new owner owns the semaphore exclusively, even if it is not
running yet.
So if the old owner, even if just a few instructions later, does a
down() [lock_kernel()] again, it will be blocked and will have to wait
on the new owner to eventually be scheduled (possibly on another CPU)!
Or if another task gets to lock_kernel() sooner than the "new owner"
scheduled, it will be blocked unnecessarily and for a very long time
when there are 2000 tasks running.
I.e. the implementation of the new semaphores code does wake-one and
lock ownership in a very restrictive way - it does not allow
opportunistic re-locking of the lock at all and keeps the scheduler from
picking task order intelligently.
This kind of scheduling, with 2000 AIM7 processes running, creates awful
cross-scheduling between those 2000 tasks, causes reduced parallelism, a
throttled runqueue length and a lot of idle time. With increasing number
of CPUs it causes an exponentially worse behavior in AIM7, as the chance
for a newly woken new-owner task to actually run anytime soon is less
and less likely.
Note that it takes just a tiny bit of contention for the 'new-semaphore
catastrophy' to happen: the wakeup latencies get added to whatever small
contention there is, and quickly snowball out of control!
I believe Yanmin's findings and numbers support this analysis too.
The best fix for this problem is to use the same scheduling logic that
the kernel/mutex.c code uses: keep the wake-one behavior (that is OK and
wanted because we do not want to over-schedule), but also allow
opportunistic locking of the lock even if a wakee is already "in
flight".
The patch below implements this new logic. With this patch applied the
AIM7 regression is largely fixed on my quad testbox:
# v2.6.25 vanilla:
..................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 56096.4 91 207.5 789.7 0.4675
2000 55894.4 94 208.2 792.7 0.4658
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 vanilla:
...................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 33230.6 83 350.3 784.5 0.2769
2000 31778.1 86 366.3 783.6 0.2648
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 + semaphore-speedup:
...............................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 55707.1 92 209.0 795.6 0.4642
2000 55704.4 96 209.0 796.0 0.4642
i.e. a 67% speedup. We are now back to within 1% of the v2.6.25
performance levels and have zero idle time during the test, as expected.
Btw., interactivity also improved dramatically with the fix - for
example console-switching became almost instantaneous during this
workload (which after all is running 2000 tasks at once!), without the
patch it was stuck for a minute at times.
There's another nice side-effect of this speedup patch, the new generic
semaphore code got even smaller:
text data bss dec hex filename
1241 0 0 1241 4d9 semaphore.o.before
1207 0 0 1207 4b7 semaphore.o.after
(because the waiter.up complication got removed.)
Longer-term we should look into using the mutex code for the generic
semaphore code as well - but i's not easy due to legacies and it's
outside of the scope of v2.6.26 and outside the scope of this patch as
well.
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-08 09:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
sem->count--;
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
result = __down_killable(sem);
|
2008-03-14 17:19:33 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_killable);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* down_trylock - try to acquire the semaphore, without waiting
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to be acquired
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Try to acquire the semaphore atomically. Returns 0 if the mutex has
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
* been acquired successfully or 1 if it it cannot be acquired.
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* NOTE: This return value is inverted from both spin_trylock and
|
|
|
|
* mutex_trylock! Be careful about this when converting code.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Unlike mutex_trylock, this function can be used from interrupt context,
|
|
|
|
* and the semaphore can be released by any task or interrupt.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
int down_trylock(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
int count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
count = sem->count - 1;
|
|
|
|
if (likely(count >= 0))
|
|
|
|
sem->count = count;
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return (count < 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_trylock);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* down_timeout - acquire the semaphore within a specified time
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to be acquired
|
|
|
|
* @jiffies: how long to wait before failing
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Attempts to acquire the semaphore. If no more tasks are allowed to
|
|
|
|
* acquire the semaphore, calling this function will put the task to sleep.
|
|
|
|
* If the semaphore is not released within the specified number of jiffies,
|
|
|
|
* this function returns -ETIME. It returns 0 if the semaphore was acquired.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
int down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long jiffies)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
int result = 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
|
semaphore: fix
Yanmin Zhang reported:
| Comparing with kernel 2.6.25, AIM7 (use tmpfs) has more th
| regression under 2.6.26-rc1 on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton,
| and Itanium Montecito. Bisect located the patch below:
|
| 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff is first bad commit
| commit 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff
| Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
| Date: Fri Mar 7 21:55:58 2008 -0500
|
| Generic semaphore implementation
|
| After I manually reverted the patch against 2.6.26-rc1 while fixing
| lots of conflicts/errors, aim7 regression became less than 2%.
i reproduced the AIM7 workload and can confirm Yanmin's findings that
-.26-rc1 regresses over .25 - by over 67% here.
Looking at the workload i found and fixed what i believe to be the real
bug causing the AIM7 regression: it was inefficient wakeup / scheduling
/ locking behavior of the new generic semaphore code, causing suboptimal
performance.
The problem comes from the following code. The new semaphore code does
this on down():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
sem->count--;
else
__down(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
and this on up():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
sem->count++;
else
__up(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
where __up() does:
list_del(&waiter->list);
waiter->up = 1;
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
and where __down() does this in essence:
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
waiter.up = 0;
for (;;) {
[...]
spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
if (waiter.up)
return 0;
}
the fastpath looks good and obvious, but note the following property of
the contended path: if there's a task on the ->wait_list, the up() of
the current owner will "pass over" ownership to that waiting task, in a
wake-one manner, via the waiter->up flag and by removing the waiter from
the wait list.
That is all and fine in principle, but as implemented in
kernel/semaphore.c it also creates a nasty, hidden source of contention!
The contention comes from the following property of the new semaphore
code: the new owner owns the semaphore exclusively, even if it is not
running yet.
So if the old owner, even if just a few instructions later, does a
down() [lock_kernel()] again, it will be blocked and will have to wait
on the new owner to eventually be scheduled (possibly on another CPU)!
Or if another task gets to lock_kernel() sooner than the "new owner"
scheduled, it will be blocked unnecessarily and for a very long time
when there are 2000 tasks running.
I.e. the implementation of the new semaphores code does wake-one and
lock ownership in a very restrictive way - it does not allow
opportunistic re-locking of the lock at all and keeps the scheduler from
picking task order intelligently.
This kind of scheduling, with 2000 AIM7 processes running, creates awful
cross-scheduling between those 2000 tasks, causes reduced parallelism, a
throttled runqueue length and a lot of idle time. With increasing number
of CPUs it causes an exponentially worse behavior in AIM7, as the chance
for a newly woken new-owner task to actually run anytime soon is less
and less likely.
Note that it takes just a tiny bit of contention for the 'new-semaphore
catastrophy' to happen: the wakeup latencies get added to whatever small
contention there is, and quickly snowball out of control!
I believe Yanmin's findings and numbers support this analysis too.
The best fix for this problem is to use the same scheduling logic that
the kernel/mutex.c code uses: keep the wake-one behavior (that is OK and
wanted because we do not want to over-schedule), but also allow
opportunistic locking of the lock even if a wakee is already "in
flight".
The patch below implements this new logic. With this patch applied the
AIM7 regression is largely fixed on my quad testbox:
# v2.6.25 vanilla:
..................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 56096.4 91 207.5 789.7 0.4675
2000 55894.4 94 208.2 792.7 0.4658
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 vanilla:
...................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 33230.6 83 350.3 784.5 0.2769
2000 31778.1 86 366.3 783.6 0.2648
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 + semaphore-speedup:
...............................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 55707.1 92 209.0 795.6 0.4642
2000 55704.4 96 209.0 796.0 0.4642
i.e. a 67% speedup. We are now back to within 1% of the v2.6.25
performance levels and have zero idle time during the test, as expected.
Btw., interactivity also improved dramatically with the fix - for
example console-switching became almost instantaneous during this
workload (which after all is running 2000 tasks at once!), without the
patch it was stuck for a minute at times.
There's another nice side-effect of this speedup patch, the new generic
semaphore code got even smaller:
text data bss dec hex filename
1241 0 0 1241 4d9 semaphore.o.before
1207 0 0 1207 4b7 semaphore.o.after
(because the waiter.up complication got removed.)
Longer-term we should look into using the mutex code for the generic
semaphore code as well - but i's not easy due to legacies and it's
outside of the scope of v2.6.26 and outside the scope of this patch as
well.
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-08 09:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
sem->count--;
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
result = __down_timeout(sem, jiffies);
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_timeout);
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-11 19:23:52 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* up - release the semaphore
|
|
|
|
* @sem: the semaphore to release
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Release the semaphore. Unlike mutexes, up() may be called from any
|
|
|
|
* context and even by tasks which have never called down().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
void up(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
|
|
|
|
sem->count++;
|
|
|
|
else
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
__up(sem);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Functions for the contended case */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct semaphore_waiter {
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
struct task_struct *task;
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
int up;
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
* Because this function is inlined, the 'state' parameter will be
|
|
|
|
* constant, and thus optimised away by the compiler. Likewise the
|
|
|
|
* 'timeout' parameter for the cases without timeouts.
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
static inline int __sched __down_common(struct semaphore *sem, long state,
|
|
|
|
long timeout)
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct task_struct *task = current;
|
|
|
|
struct semaphore_waiter waiter;
|
|
|
|
|
semaphore: fix
Yanmin Zhang reported:
| Comparing with kernel 2.6.25, AIM7 (use tmpfs) has more th
| regression under 2.6.26-rc1 on my 8-core stoakley, 16-core tigerton,
| and Itanium Montecito. Bisect located the patch below:
|
| 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff is first bad commit
| commit 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff
| Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
| Date: Fri Mar 7 21:55:58 2008 -0500
|
| Generic semaphore implementation
|
| After I manually reverted the patch against 2.6.26-rc1 while fixing
| lots of conflicts/errors, aim7 regression became less than 2%.
i reproduced the AIM7 workload and can confirm Yanmin's findings that
-.26-rc1 regresses over .25 - by over 67% here.
Looking at the workload i found and fixed what i believe to be the real
bug causing the AIM7 regression: it was inefficient wakeup / scheduling
/ locking behavior of the new generic semaphore code, causing suboptimal
performance.
The problem comes from the following code. The new semaphore code does
this on down():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(sem->count > 0))
sem->count--;
else
__down(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
and this on up():
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->lock, flags);
if (likely(list_empty(&sem->wait_list)))
sem->count++;
else
__up(sem);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->lock, flags);
where __up() does:
list_del(&waiter->list);
waiter->up = 1;
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
and where __down() does this in essence:
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
waiter.task = task;
waiter.up = 0;
for (;;) {
[...]
spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
if (waiter.up)
return 0;
}
the fastpath looks good and obvious, but note the following property of
the contended path: if there's a task on the ->wait_list, the up() of
the current owner will "pass over" ownership to that waiting task, in a
wake-one manner, via the waiter->up flag and by removing the waiter from
the wait list.
That is all and fine in principle, but as implemented in
kernel/semaphore.c it also creates a nasty, hidden source of contention!
The contention comes from the following property of the new semaphore
code: the new owner owns the semaphore exclusively, even if it is not
running yet.
So if the old owner, even if just a few instructions later, does a
down() [lock_kernel()] again, it will be blocked and will have to wait
on the new owner to eventually be scheduled (possibly on another CPU)!
Or if another task gets to lock_kernel() sooner than the "new owner"
scheduled, it will be blocked unnecessarily and for a very long time
when there are 2000 tasks running.
I.e. the implementation of the new semaphores code does wake-one and
lock ownership in a very restrictive way - it does not allow
opportunistic re-locking of the lock at all and keeps the scheduler from
picking task order intelligently.
This kind of scheduling, with 2000 AIM7 processes running, creates awful
cross-scheduling between those 2000 tasks, causes reduced parallelism, a
throttled runqueue length and a lot of idle time. With increasing number
of CPUs it causes an exponentially worse behavior in AIM7, as the chance
for a newly woken new-owner task to actually run anytime soon is less
and less likely.
Note that it takes just a tiny bit of contention for the 'new-semaphore
catastrophy' to happen: the wakeup latencies get added to whatever small
contention there is, and quickly snowball out of control!
I believe Yanmin's findings and numbers support this analysis too.
The best fix for this problem is to use the same scheduling logic that
the kernel/mutex.c code uses: keep the wake-one behavior (that is OK and
wanted because we do not want to over-schedule), but also allow
opportunistic locking of the lock even if a wakee is already "in
flight".
The patch below implements this new logic. With this patch applied the
AIM7 regression is largely fixed on my quad testbox:
# v2.6.25 vanilla:
..................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 56096.4 91 207.5 789.7 0.4675
2000 55894.4 94 208.2 792.7 0.4658
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 vanilla:
...................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 33230.6 83 350.3 784.5 0.2769
2000 31778.1 86 366.3 783.6 0.2648
# v2.6.26-rc1-166-gc0a1811 + semaphore-speedup:
...............................................
Tasks Jobs/Min JTI Real CPU Jobs/sec/task
2000 55707.1 92 209.0 795.6 0.4642
2000 55704.4 96 209.0 796.0 0.4642
i.e. a 67% speedup. We are now back to within 1% of the v2.6.25
performance levels and have zero idle time during the test, as expected.
Btw., interactivity also improved dramatically with the fix - for
example console-switching became almost instantaneous during this
workload (which after all is running 2000 tasks at once!), without the
patch it was stuck for a minute at times.
There's another nice side-effect of this speedup patch, the new generic
semaphore code got even smaller:
text data bss dec hex filename
1241 0 0 1241 4d9 semaphore.o.before
1207 0 0 1207 4b7 semaphore.o.after
(because the waiter.up complication got removed.)
Longer-term we should look into using the mutex code for the generic
semaphore code as well - but i's not easy due to legacies and it's
outside of the scope of v2.6.26 and outside the scope of this patch as
well.
Bisected-by: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-05-08 09:53:48 +00:00
|
|
|
list_add_tail(&waiter.list, &sem->wait_list);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
waiter.task = task;
|
|
|
|
waiter.up = 0;
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE && signal_pending(task))
|
|
|
|
goto interrupted;
|
|
|
|
if (state == TASK_KILLABLE && fatal_signal_pending(task))
|
|
|
|
goto interrupted;
|
|
|
|
if (timeout <= 0)
|
|
|
|
goto timed_out;
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
__set_task_state(task, state);
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock_irq(&sem->lock);
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock_irq(&sem->lock);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
if (waiter.up)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
timed_out:
|
|
|
|
list_del(&waiter.list);
|
|
|
|
return -ETIME;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interrupted:
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
list_del(&waiter.list);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
return -EINTR;
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static noinline void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
__down_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static noinline int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
return __down_common(sem, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-14 17:19:33 +00:00
|
|
|
static noinline int __sched __down_killable(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2008-03-14 17:43:13 +00:00
|
|
|
return __down_common(sem, TASK_KILLABLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static noinline int __sched __down_timeout(struct semaphore *sem, long jiffies)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return __down_common(sem, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, jiffies);
|
2008-03-14 17:19:33 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
static noinline void __sched __up(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2008-03-14 18:35:22 +00:00
|
|
|
struct semaphore_waiter *waiter = list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list,
|
|
|
|
struct semaphore_waiter, list);
|
2008-05-11 03:43:22 +00:00
|
|
|
list_del(&waiter->list);
|
|
|
|
waiter->up = 1;
|
2008-03-14 18:35:22 +00:00
|
|
|
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
2008-03-08 02:55:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|