linux/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c

550 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-11-01 14:07:57 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/*
* linux/fs/hfsplus/catalog.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2001
* Brad Boyer (flar@allandria.com)
* (C) 2003 Ardis Technologies <roman@ardistech.com>
*
* Handling of catalog records
*/
#include "hfsplus_fs.h"
#include "hfsplus_raw.h"
int hfsplus_cat_case_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *k1,
const hfsplus_btree_key *k2)
{
__be32 k1p, k2p;
k1p = k1->cat.parent;
k2p = k2->cat.parent;
if (k1p != k2p)
return be32_to_cpu(k1p) < be32_to_cpu(k2p) ? -1 : 1;
return hfsplus_strcasecmp(&k1->cat.name, &k2->cat.name);
}
int hfsplus_cat_bin_cmp_key(const hfsplus_btree_key *k1,
const hfsplus_btree_key *k2)
{
__be32 k1p, k2p;
k1p = k1->cat.parent;
k2p = k2->cat.parent;
if (k1p != k2p)
return be32_to_cpu(k1p) < be32_to_cpu(k2p) ? -1 : 1;
return hfsplus_strcmp(&k1->cat.name, &k2->cat.name);
}
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
/* Generates key for catalog file/folders record. */
int hfsplus_cat_build_key(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent, const struct qstr *str)
{
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
int len, err;
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_asc2uni(sb, &key->cat.name, HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN,
str->name, str->len);
if (unlikely(err < 0))
return err;
len = be16_to_cpu(key->cat.name.length);
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + 2 * len);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
return 0;
}
/* Generates key for catalog thread record. */
void hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent)
{
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
key->cat.name.length = 0;
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6);
}
static void hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni(hfsplus_btree_key *key, u32 parent,
struct hfsplus_unistr *name)
{
int ustrlen;
ustrlen = be16_to_cpu(name->length);
key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(parent);
key->cat.name.length = cpu_to_be16(ustrlen);
ustrlen *= 2;
memcpy(key->cat.name.unicode, name->unicode, ustrlen);
key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + ustrlen);
}
void hfsplus_cat_set_perms(struct inode *inode, struct hfsplus_perm *perms)
{
if (inode->i_flags & S_IMMUTABLE)
perms->rootflags |= HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE;
else
perms->rootflags &= ~HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE;
if (inode->i_flags & S_APPEND)
perms->rootflags |= HFSPLUS_FLG_APPEND;
else
perms->rootflags &= ~HFSPLUS_FLG_APPEND;
perms->userflags = HFSPLUS_I(inode)->userflags;
perms->mode = cpu_to_be16(inode->i_mode);
perms->owner = cpu_to_be32(i_uid_read(inode));
perms->group = cpu_to_be32(i_gid_read(inode));
if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
perms->dev = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_nlink);
else if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode))
perms->dev = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_rdev);
else
perms->dev = 0;
}
static int hfsplus_cat_build_record(hfsplus_cat_entry *entry,
u32 cnid, struct inode *inode)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(inode->i_sb);
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
struct hfsplus_cat_folder *folder;
folder = &entry->folder;
memset(folder, 0, sizeof(*folder));
folder->type = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FOLDER);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags))
folder->flags |= cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT);
folder->id = cpu_to_be32(inode->i_ino);
HFSPLUS_I(inode)->create_date =
folder->create_date =
folder->content_mod_date =
folder->attribute_mod_date =
folder->access_date = hfsp_now2mt();
hfsplus_cat_set_perms(inode, &folder->permissions);
if (inode == sbi->hidden_dir)
/* invisible and namelocked */
folder->user_info.frFlags = cpu_to_be16(0x5000);
return sizeof(*folder);
} else {
struct hfsplus_cat_file *file;
file = &entry->file;
memset(file, 0, sizeof(*file));
file->type = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE);
file->flags = cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD_EXISTS);
file->id = cpu_to_be32(cnid);
HFSPLUS_I(inode)->create_date =
file->create_date =
file->content_mod_date =
file->attribute_mod_date =
file->access_date = hfsp_now2mt();
if (cnid == inode->i_ino) {
hfsplus_cat_set_perms(inode, &file->permissions);
if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_SYMLINK_TYPE);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_SYMLINK_CREATOR);
} else {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(sbi->type);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(sbi->creator);
}
if (HFSPLUS_FLG_IMMUTABLE &
(file->permissions.rootflags |
file->permissions.userflags))
file->flags |=
cpu_to_be16(HFSPLUS_FILE_LOCKED);
} else {
file->user_info.fdType =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_HARDLINK_TYPE);
file->user_info.fdCreator =
cpu_to_be32(HFSP_HFSPLUS_CREATOR);
file->user_info.fdFlags =
cpu_to_be16(0x100);
file->create_date =
HFSPLUS_I(sbi->hidden_dir)->create_date;
file->permissions.dev =
cpu_to_be32(HFSPLUS_I(inode)->linkid);
}
return sizeof(*file);
}
}
static int hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(struct super_block *sb,
hfsplus_cat_entry *entry, int type,
u32 parentid, const struct qstr *str)
{
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
int err;
entry->type = cpu_to_be16(type);
entry->thread.reserved = 0;
entry->thread.parentID = cpu_to_be32(parentid);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_asc2uni(sb, &entry->thread.nodeName, HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN,
str->name, str->len);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
if (unlikely(err < 0))
return err;
return 10 + be16_to_cpu(entry->thread.nodeName.length) * 2;
}
/* Try to get a catalog entry for given catalog id */
int hfsplus_find_cat(struct super_block *sb, u32 cnid,
struct hfs_find_data *fd)
{
hfsplus_cat_entry tmp;
int err;
u16 type;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd->search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_read(fd, &tmp, sizeof(hfsplus_cat_entry));
if (err)
return err;
type = be16_to_cpu(tmp.type);
if (type != HFSPLUS_FOLDER_THREAD && type != HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD) {
pr_err("found bad thread record in catalog\n");
return -EIO;
}
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-16 05:04:08 +00:00
if (be16_to_cpu(tmp.thread.nodeName.length) > 255) {
pr_err("catalog name length corrupted\n");
hfsplus: fix Buffer overflow with a corrupted image When an hfsplus image gets corrupted it might happen that the catalog namelength field gets b0rked. If we mount such an image the memcpy() in hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() writes more than the 255 that fit in the name field. Depending on the size of the overwritten data, we either only get memory corruption or also trigger an oops like this: [ 221.628020] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at c82b0000 [ 221.629066] IP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] *pde = 0ea29163 *pte = 082b0160 [ 221.629066] Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT DEBUG_PAGEALLOC [ 221.629066] Modules linked in: [ 221.629066] [ 221.629066] Pid: 4845, comm: mount Not tainted (2.6.27-rc4-00123-gd3ee1b4-dirty #28) [ 221.629066] EIP: 0060:[<c022d4b1>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0 [ 221.629066] EIP is at hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 [ 221.629066] EAX: 00000029 EBX: 00016210 ECX: 000042c2 EDX: 00000002 [ 221.629066] ESI: c82d70ca EDI: c82b0000 EBP: c82d1bcc ESP: c82d199c [ 221.629066] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068 [ 221.629066] Process mount (pid: 4845, ti=c82d1000 task=c8224060 task.ti=c82d1000) [ 221.629066] Stack: c080b3c4 c82aa8f8 c82d19c2 00016210 c080b3be c82d1bd4 c82aa8f0 00000300 [ 221.629066] 01000000 750008b1 74006e00 74006900 65006c00 c82d6400 c013bd35 c8224060 [ 221.629066] 00000036 00000046 c82d19f0 00000082 c8224548 c8224060 00000036 c0d653cc [ 221.629066] Call Trace: [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c01302d2>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x1b/0x27 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109e32>] ? save_stack_address+0x0/0x2c [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c013553d>] ? down+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013da5d>] ? mark_held_locks+0x43/0x5a [ 221.629066] [<c013dc3a>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c06abec8>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x42/0x58 [ 221.629066] [<c013555c>] ? down+0x2b/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c022aa68>] ? hfsplus_iget+0xa0/0x154 [ 221.629066] [<c022b0b9>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x280/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c041c9e4>] ? string+0x2b/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c041cd16>] ? vsnprintf+0x2e9/0x512 [ 221.629066] [<c010487a>] ? dump_trace+0xca/0xd6 [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c0109eaf>] ? save_stack_trace+0x1c/0x3a [ 221.629066] [<c013b571>] ? save_trace+0x37/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013b62e>] ? add_lock_to_list+0x67/0x8d [ 221.629066] [<c013ea1c>] ? validate_chain+0x8a4/0x9f4 [ 221.629066] [<c01354d3>] ? up+0xc/0x2f [ 221.629066] [<c013f1f6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x68a/0x6e0 [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c013bca3>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x14/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c013bd35>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [ 221.629066] [<c0107aa3>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [ 221.629066] [<c041cfb7>] ? snprintf+0x1b/0x1d [ 221.629066] [<c01ba466>] ? disk_name+0x25/0x67 [ 221.629066] [<c0183960>] ? get_sb_bdev+0xcd/0x10b [ 221.629066] [<c016ad92>] ? kstrdup+0x2a/0x4c [ 221.629066] [<c022a7b3>] ? hfsplus_get_sb+0x13/0x15 [ 221.629066] [<c022ae39>] ? hfsplus_fill_super+0x0/0x447 [ 221.629066] [<c0183583>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x3b/0x76 [ 221.629066] [<c0183602>] ? do_kern_mount+0x32/0xba [ 221.629066] [<c01960d4>] ? do_new_mount+0x46/0x74 [ 221.629066] [<c0196277>] ? do_mount+0x175/0x193 [ 221.629066] [<c013dbf4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf4/0x12f [ 221.629066] [<c01663b2>] ? __get_free_pages+0x1e/0x24 [ 221.629066] [<c06ac07b>] ? lock_kernel+0x19/0x8c [ 221.629066] [<c01962e6>] ? sys_mount+0x51/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01962f9>] ? sys_mount+0x64/0x9b [ 221.629066] [<c01038bd>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 [ 221.629066] ======================= [ 221.629066] Code: 89 c2 c1 e2 08 c1 e8 08 09 c2 8b 85 e8 fd ff ff 66 89 50 06 89 c7 53 83 c7 08 56 57 68 c4 b3 80 c0 e8 8c 5c ef ff 89 d9 c1 e9 02 <f3> a5 89 d9 83 e1 03 74 02 f3 a4 83 c3 06 8b 95 e8 fd ff ff 0f [ 221.629066] EIP: [<c022d4b1>] hfsplus_find_cat+0x10d/0x151 SS:ESP 0068:c82d199c [ 221.629066] ---[ end trace e417a1d67f0d0066 ]--- Since hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni() returns void and only has one callsite, the check is performed at the callsite. Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-10-16 05:04:08 +00:00
return -EIO;
}
hfsplus_cat_build_key_uni(fd->search_key,
be32_to_cpu(tmp.thread.parentID),
&tmp.thread.nodeName);
return hfs_brec_find(fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
}
static void hfsplus_subfolders_inc(struct inode *dir)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags)) {
/*
* Increment subfolder count. Note, the value is only meaningful
* for folders with HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT flag set.
*/
HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders++;
}
}
static void hfsplus_subfolders_dec(struct inode *dir)
{
struct hfsplus_sb_info *sbi = HFSPLUS_SB(dir->i_sb);
if (test_bit(HFSPLUS_SB_HFSX, &sbi->flags)) {
/*
* Decrement subfolder count. Note, the value is only meaningful
* for folders with HFSPLUS_HAS_FOLDER_COUNT flag set.
*
* Check for zero. Some subfolders may have been created
* by an implementation ignorant of this counter.
*/
if (HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders)
HFSPLUS_I(dir)->subfolders--;
}
}
int hfsplus_create_cat(u32 cnid, struct inode *dir,
const struct qstr *str, struct inode *inode)
{
struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data fd;
hfsplus_cat_entry entry;
int entry_size;
int err;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "create_cat: %s,%u(%d)\n",
str->name, cnid, inode->i_nlink);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &fd);
if (err)
return err;
/*
* Fail early and avoid ENOSPC during the btree operations. We may
* have to split the root node at most once.
*/
err = hfs_bmap_reserve(fd.tree, 2 * fd.tree->depth);
if (err)
goto err2;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
entry_size = hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(sb, &entry,
S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) ?
HFSPLUS_FOLDER_THREAD : HFSPLUS_FILE_THREAD,
dir->i_ino, str);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
if (unlikely(entry_size < 0)) {
err = entry_size;
goto err2;
}
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto err2;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&fd, &entry, entry_size);
if (err)
goto err2;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, fd.search_key, dir->i_ino, str);
if (unlikely(err))
goto err1;
entry_size = hfsplus_cat_build_record(&entry, cnid, inode);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
/* panic? */
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto err1;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&fd, &entry, entry_size);
if (err)
goto err1;
dir->i_size++;
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
hfsplus_subfolders_inc(dir);
dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = current_time(dir);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return 0;
err1:
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
if (!hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key))
hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
err2:
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return err;
}
int hfsplus_delete_cat(u32 cnid, struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *str)
{
struct super_block *sb = dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data fd;
struct hfsplus_fork_raw fork;
struct list_head *pos;
int err, off;
u16 type;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "delete_cat: %s,%u\n", str ? str->name : NULL, cnid);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &fd);
if (err)
return err;
/*
* Fail early and avoid ENOSPC during the btree operations. We may
* have to split the root node at most once.
*/
err = hfs_bmap_reserve(fd.tree, 2 * (int)fd.tree->depth - 2);
if (err)
goto out;
if (!str) {
int len;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
off = fd.entryoffset +
offsetof(struct hfsplus_cat_thread, nodeName);
fd.search_key->cat.parent = cpu_to_be32(dir->i_ino);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode,
&fd.search_key->cat.name.length, off, 2);
len = be16_to_cpu(fd.search_key->cat.name.length) * 2;
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode,
&fd.search_key->cat.name.unicode,
off + 2, len);
fd.search_key->key_len = cpu_to_be16(6 + len);
} else {
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, fd.search_key, dir->i_ino, str);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
type = hfs_bnode_read_u16(fd.bnode, fd.entryoffset);
if (type == HFSPLUS_FILE) {
#if 0
off = fd.entryoffset + offsetof(hfsplus_cat_file, data_fork);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode, &fork, off, sizeof(fork));
hfsplus_free_fork(sb, cnid, &fork, HFSPLUS_TYPE_DATA);
#endif
off = fd.entryoffset +
offsetof(struct hfsplus_cat_file, rsrc_fork);
hfs_bnode_read(fd.bnode, &fork, off, sizeof(fork));
hfsplus_free_fork(sb, cnid, &fork, HFSPLUS_TYPE_RSRC);
}
/* we only need to take spinlock for exclusion with ->release() */
spin_lock(&HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_lock);
list_for_each(pos, &HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_list) {
struct hfsplus_readdir_data *rd =
list_entry(pos, struct hfsplus_readdir_data, list);
if (fd.tree->keycmp(fd.search_key, (void *)&rd->key) < 0)
rd->file->f_pos--;
}
spin_unlock(&HFSPLUS_I(dir)->open_dir_lock);
err = hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
if (err)
goto out;
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_remove(&fd);
if (err)
goto out;
dir->i_size--;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_dec(dir);
dir->i_mtime = dir->i_ctime = current_time(dir);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
if (type == HFSPLUS_FILE || type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER) {
if (HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->attr_tree)
hfsplus_delete_all_attrs(dir, cnid);
}
out:
hfs_find_exit(&fd);
return err;
}
int hfsplus_rename_cat(u32 cnid,
struct inode *src_dir, const struct qstr *src_name,
struct inode *dst_dir, const struct qstr *dst_name)
{
struct super_block *sb = src_dir->i_sb;
struct hfs_find_data src_fd, dst_fd;
hfsplus_cat_entry entry;
int entry_size, type;
int err;
hfs_dbg(CAT_MOD, "rename_cat: %u - %lu,%s - %lu,%s\n",
cnid, src_dir->i_ino, src_name->name,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name->name);
err = hfs_find_init(HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->cat_tree, &src_fd);
if (err)
return err;
dst_fd = src_fd;
/*
* Fail early and avoid ENOSPC during the btree operations. We may
* have to split the root node at most twice.
*/
err = hfs_bmap_reserve(src_fd.tree, 4 * (int)src_fd.tree->depth - 1);
if (err)
goto out;
/* find the old dir entry and read the data */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, src_fd.search_key,
src_dir->i_ino, src_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
if (src_fd.entrylength > sizeof(entry) || src_fd.entrylength < 0) {
err = -EIO;
goto out;
}
hfs_bnode_read(src_fd.bnode, &entry, src_fd.entryoffset,
src_fd.entrylength);
type = be16_to_cpu(entry.type);
/* create new dir entry with the data from the old entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, dst_fd.search_key,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&dst_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&dst_fd, &entry, src_fd.entrylength);
if (err)
goto out;
dst_dir->i_size++;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_inc(dst_dir);
dst_dir->i_mtime = dst_dir->i_ctime = current_time(dst_dir);
/* finally remove the old entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
err = hfsplus_cat_build_key(sb, src_fd.search_key,
src_dir->i_ino, src_name);
if (unlikely(err))
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
err = hfs_brec_remove(&src_fd);
if (err)
goto out;
src_dir->i_size--;
if (type == HFSPLUS_FOLDER)
hfsplus_subfolders_dec(src_dir);
src_dir->i_mtime = src_dir->i_ctime = current_time(src_dir);
/* remove old thread entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, src_fd.search_key, cnid);
err = hfs_brec_find(&src_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err)
goto out;
type = hfs_bnode_read_u16(src_fd.bnode, src_fd.entryoffset);
err = hfs_brec_remove(&src_fd);
if (err)
goto out;
/* create new thread entry */
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid(sb, dst_fd.search_key, cnid);
entry_size = hfsplus_fill_cat_thread(sb, &entry, type,
dst_dir->i_ino, dst_name);
hfsplus: fix longname handling Longname is not correctly handled by hfsplus driver. If an attempt to create a longname(>255) file/directory is made, it succeeds by creating a file/directory with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect catalog key. Thus leaving the volume in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Although lookup is always called first to create a negative entry, so just doing a check in lookup would probably fix this issue. I choose to propagate error to other iops as well. Please NOTE: I have factored out hfsplus_cat_build_key_with_cnid from hfsplus_cat_build_key, to avoid unncessary branching. Thanks a lot. TEST: ------ dir="TEST_DIR" cdir=`pwd` name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" name256="${name255}5" mkdir $dir cd $dir touch $name255 rm -f $name255 touch $name256 ls -la cd $cdir rm -rf $dir RESULT: ------- [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cdir=`pwd` [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name255="_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789\ > _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ name256="${name255}5" [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ mkdir $dir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ cd $dir [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ rm -f $name255 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ touch $name256 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ ls -la ls: cannot access _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234: No such file or directory total 0 drwxrwxr-x 1 sougata sougata 3 Feb 20 19:56 . drwxrwxrwx 1 root root 6 Feb 20 19:56 .. -????????? ? ? ? ? ? _123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_123456789_1234 [sougata@ultrabook TEST_DIR]$ cd $cdir [sougata@ultrabook tmp]$ rm -rf $dir rm: cannot remove `TEST_DIR': Directory not empty -ENAMETOOLONG returned from hfsplus_asc2uni was not propaged to iops. This allowed hfsplus to create files/directories with HFSPLUS_MAX_STRLEN and incorrect keys, leaving the FS in an inconsistent state. This patch fixes this issue. Signed-off-by: Sougata Santra <sougata@tuxera.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-12-19 00:17:12 +00:00
if (unlikely(entry_size < 0)) {
err = entry_size;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_find(&dst_fd, hfs_find_rec_by_key);
if (err != -ENOENT) {
if (!err)
err = -EEXIST;
goto out;
}
err = hfs_brec_insert(&dst_fd, &entry, entry_size);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(dst_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
hfsplus_mark_inode_dirty(src_dir, HFSPLUS_I_CAT_DIRTY);
out:
hfs_bnode_put(dst_fd.bnode);
hfs_find_exit(&src_fd);
return err;
}