2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
GPIO Driver Interface
|
|
|
|
=====================
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
This document serves as a guide for writers of GPIO chip drivers.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each GPIO controller driver needs to include the following header, which defines
|
|
|
|
the structures used to define a GPIO driver:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal Representation of GPIOs
|
|
|
|
================================
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
A GPIO chip handles one or more GPIO lines. To be considered a GPIO chip, the
|
|
|
|
lines must conform to the definition: General Purpose Input/Output. If the
|
|
|
|
line is not general purpose, it is not GPIO and should not be handled by a
|
|
|
|
GPIO chip. The use case is the indicative: certain lines in a system may be
|
|
|
|
called GPIO but serve a very particular purpose thus not meeting the criteria
|
|
|
|
of a general purpose I/O. On the other hand a LED driver line may be used as a
|
|
|
|
GPIO and should therefore still be handled by a GPIO chip driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inside a GPIO driver, individual GPIO lines are identified by their hardware
|
|
|
|
number, sometime also referred to as ``offset``, which is a unique number
|
|
|
|
between 0 and n-1, n being the number of GPIOs managed by the chip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The hardware GPIO number should be something intuitive to the hardware, for
|
|
|
|
example if a system uses a memory-mapped set of I/O-registers where 32 GPIO
|
|
|
|
lines are handled by one bit per line in a 32-bit register, it makes sense to
|
|
|
|
use hardware offsets 0..31 for these, corresponding to bits 0..31 in the
|
|
|
|
register.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This number is purely internal: the hardware number of a particular GPIO
|
|
|
|
line is never made visible outside of the driver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On top of this internal number, each GPIO line also needs to have a global
|
|
|
|
number in the integer GPIO namespace so that it can be used with the legacy GPIO
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
interface. Each chip must thus have a "base" number (which can be automatically
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
assigned), and for each GPIO line the global number will be (base + hardware
|
|
|
|
number). Although the integer representation is considered deprecated, it still
|
|
|
|
has many users and thus needs to be maintained.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
So for example one platform could use global numbers 32-159 for GPIOs, with a
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
controller defining 128 GPIOs at a "base" of 32 ; while another platform uses
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
global numbers 0..63 with one set of GPIO controllers, 64-79 with another type
|
|
|
|
of GPIO controller, and on one particular board 80-95 with an FPGA. The legacy
|
|
|
|
numbers need not be contiguous; either of those platforms could also use numbers
|
|
|
|
2000-2063 to identify GPIO lines in a bank of I2C GPIO expanders.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Controller Drivers: gpio_chip
|
|
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the gpiolib framework each GPIO controller is packaged as a "struct
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
gpio_chip" (see <linux/gpio/driver.h> for its complete definition) with members
|
|
|
|
common to each controller of that type, these should be assigned by the
|
|
|
|
driver code:
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
- methods to establish GPIO line direction
|
|
|
|
- methods used to access GPIO line values
|
2018-05-16 12:08:00 +00:00
|
|
|
- method to set electrical configuration for a given GPIO line
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
- method to return the IRQ number associated to a given GPIO line
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
- flag saying whether calls to its methods may sleep
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
- optional line names array to identify lines
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- optional debugfs dump method (showing extra state information)
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
- optional base number (will be automatically assigned if omitted)
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
- optional label for diagnostics and GPIO chip mapping using platform data
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code implementing a gpio_chip should support multiple instances of the
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
controller, preferably using the driver model. That code will configure each
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
gpio_chip and issue ``gpiochip_add[_data]()`` or ``devm_gpiochip_add_data()``.
|
|
|
|
Removing a GPIO controller should be rare; use ``[devm_]gpiochip_remove()``
|
|
|
|
when it is unavoidable.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Often a gpio_chip is part of an instance-specific structure with states not
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
exposed by the GPIO interfaces, such as addressing, power management, and more.
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Chips such as audio codecs will have complex non-GPIO states.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Any debugfs dump method should normally ignore lines which haven't been
|
|
|
|
requested. They can use gpiochip_is_requested(), which returns either
|
|
|
|
NULL or the label associated with that GPIO line when it was requested.
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Realtime considerations: the GPIO driver should not use spinlock_t or any
|
|
|
|
sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) in its gpio_chip implementation (.get/.set
|
|
|
|
and direction control callbacks) if it is expected to call GPIO APIs from
|
|
|
|
atomic context on realtime kernels (inside hard IRQ handlers and similar
|
|
|
|
contexts). Normally this should not be required.
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO electrical configuration
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO lines can be configured for several electrical modes of operation by using
|
|
|
|
the .set_config() callback. Currently this API supports setting:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Debouncing
|
|
|
|
- Single-ended modes (open drain/open source)
|
|
|
|
- Pull up and pull down resistor enablement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These settings are described below.
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The .set_config() callback uses the same enumerators and configuration
|
|
|
|
semantics as the generic pin control drivers. This is not a coincidence: it is
|
|
|
|
possible to assign the .set_config() to the function gpiochip_generic_config()
|
|
|
|
which will result in pinctrl_gpio_set_config() being called and eventually
|
|
|
|
ending up in the pin control back-end "behind" the GPIO controller, usually
|
|
|
|
closer to the actual pins. This way the pin controller can manage the below
|
|
|
|
listed GPIO configurations.
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-18 09:43:43 +00:00
|
|
|
If a pin controller back-end is used, the GPIO controller or hardware
|
|
|
|
description needs to provide "GPIO ranges" mapping the GPIO line offsets to pin
|
|
|
|
numbers on the pin controller so they can properly cross-reference each other.
|
|
|
|
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO lines with debounce support
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
2017-01-31 14:43:05 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debouncing is a configuration set to a pin indicating that it is connected to
|
|
|
|
a mechanical switch or button, or similar that may bounce. Bouncing means the
|
|
|
|
line is pulled high/low quickly at very short intervals for mechanical
|
|
|
|
reasons. This can result in the value being unstable or irqs fireing repeatedly
|
|
|
|
unless the line is debounced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debouncing in practice involves setting up a timer when something happens on
|
|
|
|
the line, wait a little while and then sample the line again, so see if it
|
|
|
|
still has the same value (low or high). This could also be repeated by a clever
|
|
|
|
state machine, waiting for a line to become stable. In either case, it sets
|
|
|
|
a certain number of milliseconds for debouncing, or just "on/off" if that time
|
|
|
|
is not configurable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO lines with open drain/source support
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open drain (CMOS) or open collector (TTL) means the line is not actively driven
|
|
|
|
high: instead you provide the drain/collector as output, so when the transistor
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
is not open, it will present a high-impedance (tristate) to the external rail::
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMOS CONFIGURATION TTL CONFIGURATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||--- out +--- out
|
|
|
|
in ----|| |/
|
|
|
|
||--+ in ----|
|
|
|
|
| |\
|
|
|
|
GND GND
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This configuration is normally used as a way to achieve one of two things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Level-shifting: to reach a logical level higher than that of the silicon
|
|
|
|
where the output resides.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- Inverse wire-OR on an I/O line, for example a GPIO line, making it possible
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
for any driving stage on the line to drive it low even if any other output
|
|
|
|
to the same line is simultaneously driving it high. A special case of this
|
2019-01-17 10:13:21 +00:00
|
|
|
is driving the SCL and SDA lines of an I2C bus, which is by definition a
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
wire-OR bus.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Both use cases require that the line be equipped with a pull-up resistor. This
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
resistor will make the line tend to high level unless one of the transistors on
|
|
|
|
the rail actively pulls it down.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-27 08:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
The level on the line will go as high as the VDD on the pull-up resistor, which
|
2018-05-16 12:08:00 +00:00
|
|
|
may be higher than the level supported by the transistor, achieving a
|
2016-04-27 08:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
level-shift to the higher VDD.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Integrated electronics often have an output driver stage in the form of a CMOS
|
|
|
|
"totem-pole" with one N-MOS and one P-MOS transistor where one of them drives
|
|
|
|
the line high and one of them drives the line low. This is called a push-pull
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
output. The "totem-pole" looks like so::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VDD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OD ||--+
|
|
|
|
+--/ ---o|| P-MOS-FET
|
|
|
|
| ||--+
|
|
|
|
IN --+ +----- out
|
|
|
|
| ||--+
|
|
|
|
+--/ ----|| N-MOS-FET
|
|
|
|
OS ||--+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GND
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-27 08:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
The desired output signal (e.g. coming directly from some GPIO output register)
|
|
|
|
arrives at IN. The switches named "OD" and "OS" are normally closed, creating
|
|
|
|
a push-pull circuit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the little "switches" named "OD" and "OS" that enable/disable the
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
P-MOS or N-MOS transistor right after the split of the input. As you can see,
|
|
|
|
either transistor will go totally numb if this switch is open. The totem-pole
|
|
|
|
is then halved and give high impedance instead of actively driving the line
|
|
|
|
high or low respectively. That is usually how software-controlled open
|
|
|
|
drain/source works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some GPIO hardware come in open drain / open source configuration. Some are
|
|
|
|
hard-wired lines that will only support open drain or open source no matter
|
|
|
|
what: there is only one transistor there. Some are software-configurable:
|
|
|
|
by flipping a bit in a register the output can be configured as open drain
|
2016-04-27 08:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
or open source, in practice by flicking open the switches labeled "OD" and "OS"
|
|
|
|
in the drawing above.
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By disabling the P-MOS transistor, the output can be driven between GND and
|
|
|
|
high impedance (open drain), and by disabling the N-MOS transistor, the output
|
|
|
|
can be driven between VDD and high impedance (open source). In the first case,
|
|
|
|
a pull-up resistor is needed on the outgoing rail to complete the circuit, and
|
|
|
|
in the second case, a pull-down resistor is needed on the rail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware that supports open drain or open source or both, can implement a
|
2017-01-23 12:34:34 +00:00
|
|
|
special callback in the gpio_chip: .set_config() that takes a generic
|
|
|
|
pinconf packed value telling whether to configure the line as open drain,
|
|
|
|
open source or push-pull. This will happen in response to the
|
|
|
|
GPIO_OPEN_DRAIN or GPIO_OPEN_SOURCE flag set in the machine file, or coming
|
|
|
|
from other hardware descriptions.
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If this state can not be configured in hardware, i.e. if the GPIO hardware does
|
|
|
|
not support open drain/open source in hardware, the GPIO library will instead
|
|
|
|
use a trick: when a line is set as output, if the line is flagged as open
|
2016-04-27 08:23:44 +00:00
|
|
|
drain, and the IN output value is low, it will be driven low as usual. But
|
|
|
|
if the IN output value is set to high, it will instead *NOT* be driven high,
|
2016-04-05 14:49:57 +00:00
|
|
|
instead it will be switched to input, as input mode is high impedance, thus
|
|
|
|
achieveing an "open drain emulation" of sorts: electrically the behaviour will
|
|
|
|
be identical, with the exception of possible hardware glitches when switching
|
|
|
|
the mode of the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For open source configuration the same principle is used, just that instead
|
|
|
|
of actively driving the line low, it is set to input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO lines with pull up/down resistor support
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A GPIO line can support pull-up/down using the .set_config() callback. This
|
|
|
|
means that a pull up or pull-down resistor is available on the output of the
|
|
|
|
GPIO line, and this resistor is software controlled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In discrete designs, a pull-up or pull-down resistor is simply soldered on
|
|
|
|
the circuit board. This is not something we deal or model in software. The
|
|
|
|
most you will think about these lines is that they will very likely be
|
|
|
|
configured as open drain or open source (see the section above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The .set_config() callback can only turn pull up or down on and off, and will
|
|
|
|
no have any semantic knowledge about the resistance used. It will only say
|
|
|
|
switch a bit in a register enabling or disabling pull-up or pull-down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the GPIO line supports shunting in different resistance values for the
|
|
|
|
pull-up or pull-down resistor, the GPIO chip callback .set_config() will not
|
|
|
|
suffice. For these complex use cases, a combined GPIO chip and pin controller
|
|
|
|
need to be implemented, as the pin config interface of a pin controller
|
|
|
|
supports more versatile control over electrical properties and can handle
|
|
|
|
different pull-up or pull-down resistance values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
GPIO drivers providing IRQs
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
It is custom that GPIO drivers (GPIO chips) are also providing interrupts,
|
|
|
|
most often cascaded off a parent interrupt controller, and in some special
|
|
|
|
cases the GPIO logic is melded with a SoC's primary interrupt controller.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
The IRQ portions of the GPIO block are implemented using an irq_chip, using
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
the header <linux/irq.h>. So basically such a driver is utilizing two sub-
|
|
|
|
systems simultaneously: gpio and irq.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
It is legal for any IRQ consumer to request an IRQ from any irqchip even if it
|
|
|
|
is a combined GPIO+IRQ driver. The basic premise is that gpio_chip and
|
|
|
|
irq_chip are orthogonal, and offering their services independent of each
|
|
|
|
other.
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
gpiod_to_irq() is just a convenience function to figure out the IRQ for a
|
|
|
|
certain GPIO line and should not be relied upon to have been called before
|
|
|
|
the IRQ is used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective
|
|
|
|
callbacks from the GPIO and irq_chip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having
|
|
|
|
been called first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We can divide GPIO irqchips in two broad categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- CASCADED INTERRUPT CHIPS: this means that the GPIO chip has one common
|
|
|
|
interrupt output line, which is triggered by any enabled GPIO line on that
|
|
|
|
chip. The interrupt output line will then be routed to an parent interrupt
|
|
|
|
controller one level up, in the most simple case the systems primary
|
|
|
|
interrupt controller. This is modeled by an irqchip that will inspect bits
|
|
|
|
inside the GPIO controller to figure out which line fired it. The irqchip
|
|
|
|
part of the driver needs to inspect registers to figure this out and it
|
|
|
|
will likely also need to acknowledge that it is handling the interrupt
|
|
|
|
by clearing some bit (sometime implicitly, by just reading a status
|
|
|
|
register) and it will often need to set up the configuration such as
|
|
|
|
edge sensitivity (rising or falling edge, or high/low level interrupt for
|
|
|
|
example).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- HIERARCHICAL INTERRUPT CHIPS: this means that each GPIO line has a dedicated
|
|
|
|
irq line to a parent interrupt controller one level up. There is no need
|
|
|
|
to inquire the GPIO hardware to figure out which line has figured, but it
|
|
|
|
may still be necessary to acknowledge the interrupt and set up the
|
|
|
|
configuration such as edge sensitivity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realtime considerations: a realtime compliant GPIO driver should not use
|
|
|
|
spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM runtime) as part of its irqchip
|
|
|
|
implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- spinlock_t should be replaced with raw_spinlock_t [1].
|
|
|
|
- If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock()
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks, as these are the only slowpath callbacks
|
|
|
|
on an irqchip. Create the callbacks if needed [2].
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Cascaded GPIO irqchips
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cascaded GPIO irqchips usually fall in one of three categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- CHAINED CASCADED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are usually the type that is embedded on
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
an SoC. This means that there is a fast IRQ flow handler for the GPIOs that
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
gets called in a chain from the parent IRQ handler, most typically the
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
system interrupt controller. This means that the GPIO irqchip handler will
|
|
|
|
be called immediately from the parent irqchip, while holding the IRQs
|
|
|
|
disabled. The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
sequence in its interrupt handler::
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
|
|
|
|
chained_irq_enter(...);
|
|
|
|
generic_handle_irq(...);
|
|
|
|
chained_irq_exit(...);
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chained GPIO irqchips typically can NOT set the .can_sleep flag on
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gpio_chip, as everything happens directly in the callbacks: no
|
|
|
|
slow bus traffic like I2C can be used.
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Realtime considerations: Note that chained IRQ handlers will not be forced
|
|
|
|
threaded on -RT. As a result, spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs (like PM
|
|
|
|
runtime) can't be used in a chained IRQ handler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If required (and if it can't be converted to the nested threaded GPIO irqchip,
|
|
|
|
see below) a chained IRQ handler can be converted to generic irq handler and
|
|
|
|
this way it will become a threaded IRQ handler on -RT and a hard IRQ handler
|
|
|
|
on non-RT (for example, see [3]).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The generic_handle_irq() is expected to be called with IRQ disabled,
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
so the IRQ core will complain if it is called from an IRQ handler which is
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
forced to a thread. The "fake?" raw lock can be used to work around this
|
|
|
|
problem::
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
raw_spinlock_t wa_lock;
|
|
|
|
static irqreturn_t omap_gpio_irq_handler(int irq, void *gpiobank)
|
|
|
|
unsigned long wa_lock_flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
|
2017-11-07 18:15:47 +00:00
|
|
|
generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(bank->chip.irq.domain, bit));
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- GENERIC CHAINED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are the same as "CHAINED GPIO irqchips",
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
but chained IRQ handlers are not used. Instead GPIO IRQs dispatching is
|
|
|
|
performed by generic IRQ handler which is configured using request_irq().
|
|
|
|
The GPIO irqchip will then end up calling something like this sequence in
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
its interrupt handler::
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
static irqreturn_t gpio_rcar_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
|
|
|
for each detected GPIO IRQ
|
|
|
|
generic_handle_irq(...);
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Realtime considerations: this kind of handlers will be forced threaded on -RT,
|
|
|
|
and as result the IRQ core will complain that generic_handle_irq() is called
|
|
|
|
with IRQ enabled and the same work around as for "CHAINED GPIO irqchips" can
|
|
|
|
be applied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- NESTED THREADED GPIO IRQCHIPS: these are off-chip GPIO expanders and any
|
|
|
|
other GPIO irqchip residing on the other side of a sleeping bus such as I2C
|
|
|
|
or SPI.
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Of course such drivers that need slow bus traffic to read out IRQ status and
|
|
|
|
similar, traffic which may in turn incur other IRQs to happen, cannot be
|
|
|
|
handled in a quick IRQ handler with IRQs disabled. Instead they need to spawn
|
|
|
|
a thread and then mask the parent IRQ line until the interrupt is handled
|
2015-10-27 10:13:18 +00:00
|
|
|
by the driver. The hallmark of this driver is to call something like
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
this in its interrupt handler::
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
static irqreturn_t foo_gpio_irq(int irq, void *data)
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
handle_nested_irq(irq);
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-10-27 10:13:18 +00:00
|
|
|
The hallmark of threaded GPIO irqchips is that they set the .can_sleep
|
|
|
|
flag on struct gpio_chip to true, indicating that this chip may sleep
|
|
|
|
when accessing the GPIOs.
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
These kinds of irqchips are inherently realtime tolerant as they are
|
|
|
|
already set up to handle sleeping contexts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure helpers for GPIO irqchips
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
To help out in handling the set-up and management of GPIO irqchips and the
|
|
|
|
associated irqdomain and resource allocation callbacks, the gpiolib has
|
|
|
|
some helpers that can be enabled by selecting the GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP Kconfig
|
|
|
|
symbol:
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- gpiochip_irqchip_add(): adds a chained cascaded irqchip to a gpiochip. It
|
|
|
|
will pass the struct gpio_chip* for the chip to all IRQ callbacks, so the
|
|
|
|
callbacks need to embed the gpio_chip in its state container and obtain a
|
|
|
|
pointer to the container using container_of().
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
(See Documentation/driver-model/design-patterns.txt)
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(): adds a nested cascaded irqchip to a gpiochip,
|
|
|
|
as discussed above regarding different types of cascaded irqchips. The
|
|
|
|
cascaded irq has to be handled by a threaded interrupt handler.
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Apart from that it works exactly like the chained irqchip.
|
2016-09-20 12:15:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- gpiochip_set_chained_irqchip(): sets up a chained cascaded irq handler for a
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
gpio_chip from a parent IRQ and passes the struct gpio_chip* as handler
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
data. Notice that we pass is as the handler data, since the irqchip data is
|
|
|
|
likely used by the parent irqchip.
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
- gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(): sets up a nested cascaded irq handler for a
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
gpio_chip from a parent IRQ. As the parent IRQ has usually been
|
|
|
|
explicitly requested by the driver, this does very little more than
|
|
|
|
mark all the child IRQs as having the other IRQ as parent.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
If there is a need to exclude certain GPIO lines from the IRQ domain handled by
|
|
|
|
these helpers, we can set .irq.need_valid_mask of the gpiochip before
|
|
|
|
[devm_]gpiochip_add_data() is called. This allocates an .irq.valid_mask with as
|
|
|
|
many bits set as there are GPIO lines in the chip, each bit representing line
|
|
|
|
0..n-1. Drivers can exclude GPIO lines by clearing bits from this mask. The mask
|
|
|
|
must be filled in before gpiochip_irqchip_add() or gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested()
|
|
|
|
is called.
|
2014-04-09 12:36:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To use the helpers please keep the following in mind:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Make sure to assign all relevant members of the struct gpio_chip so that
|
|
|
|
the irqchip can initialize. E.g. .dev and .can_sleep shall be set up
|
|
|
|
properly.
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
- Nominally set all handlers to handle_bad_irq() in the setup call and pass
|
|
|
|
handle_bad_irq() as flow handler parameter in gpiochip_irqchip_add() if it is
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
expected for GPIO driver that irqchip .set_type() callback will be called
|
|
|
|
before using/enabling each GPIO IRQ. Then set the handler to
|
|
|
|
handle_level_irq() and/or handle_edge_irq() in the irqchip .set_type()
|
|
|
|
callback depending on what your controller supports and what is requested
|
|
|
|
by the consumer.
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Locking IRQ usage
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Since GPIO and irq_chip are orthogonal, we can get conflicts between different
|
|
|
|
use cases. For example a GPIO line used for IRQs should be an input line,
|
|
|
|
it does not make sense to fire interrupts on an output GPIO.
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
If there is competition inside the subsystem which side is using the
|
|
|
|
resource (a certain GPIO line and register for example) it needs to deny
|
|
|
|
certain operations and keep track of usage inside of the gpiolib subsystem.
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Input GPIOs can be used as IRQ signals. When this happens, a driver is requested
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
to mark the GPIO as being used as an IRQ::
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-23 08:27:07 +00:00
|
|
|
int gpiochip_lock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will prevent the use of non-irq related GPIO APIs until the GPIO IRQ lock
|
2018-03-08 23:40:20 +00:00
|
|
|
is released::
|
2013-11-16 12:34:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-10-23 08:27:07 +00:00
|
|
|
void gpiochip_unlock_as_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
|
2014-01-22 14:00:55 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should
|
|
|
|
typically be called in the .startup() and .shutdown() callbacks from the
|
|
|
|
irqchip.
|
2014-07-22 15:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2018-09-08 09:23:18 +00:00
|
|
|
When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callbacks are automatically
|
|
|
|
assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disabling and enabling IRQs
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some (fringe) use cases, a driver may be using a GPIO line as input for IRQs,
|
|
|
|
but occasionally switch that line over to drive output and then back to being
|
|
|
|
an input with interrupts again. This happens on things like CEC (Consumer
|
|
|
|
Electronics Control).
|
|
|
|
|
2018-09-08 09:23:18 +00:00
|
|
|
When a GPIO is used as an IRQ signal, then gpiolib also needs to know if
|
|
|
|
the IRQ is enabled or disabled. In order to inform gpiolib about this,
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
the irqchip driver should call::
|
2018-09-08 09:23:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void gpiochip_disable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This allows drivers to drive the GPIO as an output while the IRQ is
|
|
|
|
disabled. When the IRQ is enabled again, a driver should call::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void gpiochip_enable_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When implementing an irqchip inside a GPIO driver, these two functions should
|
|
|
|
typically be called in the .irq_disable() and .irq_enable() callbacks from the
|
|
|
|
irqchip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When using the gpiolib irqchip helpers, these callbacks are automatically
|
2016-11-24 09:57:25 +00:00
|
|
|
assigned.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
Real-Time compliance for GPIO IRQ chips
|
|
|
|
---------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
Any provider of irqchips needs to be carefully tailored to support Real-Time
|
2015-11-16 11:00:35 +00:00
|
|
|
preemption. It is desirable that all irqchips in the GPIO subsystem keep this
|
2018-05-16 12:08:00 +00:00
|
|
|
in mind and do the proper testing to assure they are real time-enabled.
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
So, pay attention on above realtime considerations in the documentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a checklist to follow when preparing a driver for real-time
|
|
|
|
compliance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- ensure spinlock_t is not used as part irq_chip implementation
|
|
|
|
- ensure that sleepable APIs are not used as part irq_chip implementation
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
If sleepable APIs have to be used, these can be done from the .irq_bus_lock()
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
and .irq_bus_unlock() callbacks
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
- Chained GPIO irqchips: ensure spinlock_t or any sleepable APIs are not used
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
from the chained IRQ handler
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
- Generic chained GPIO irqchips: take care about generic_handle_irq() calls and
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
apply corresponding work-around
|
|
|
|
- Chained GPIO irqchips: get rid of the chained IRQ handler and use generic irq
|
|
|
|
handler if possible
|
|
|
|
- regmap_mmio: it is possible to disable internal locking in regmap by setting
|
|
|
|
.disable_locking and handling the locking in the GPIO driver
|
|
|
|
- Test your driver with the appropriate in-kernel real-time test cases for both
|
|
|
|
level and edge IRQs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg120425.html
|
|
|
|
* [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/494
|
|
|
|
* [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/9/25/495
|
2015-10-20 14:22:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-07-22 15:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requesting self-owned GPIO pins
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
===============================
|
2014-07-22 15:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes it is useful to allow a GPIO chip driver to request its own GPIO
|
2019-04-20 11:03:34 +00:00
|
|
|
descriptors through the gpiolib API. A GPIO driver can use the following
|
|
|
|
functions to request and free descriptors::
|
2014-07-22 15:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-08-19 17:06:09 +00:00
|
|
|
struct gpio_desc *gpiochip_request_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc,
|
2018-09-04 11:31:45 +00:00
|
|
|
u16 hwnum,
|
|
|
|
const char *label,
|
|
|
|
enum gpiod_flags flags)
|
2014-07-22 15:01:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void gpiochip_free_own_desc(struct gpio_desc *desc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Descriptors requested with gpiochip_request_own_desc() must be released with
|
|
|
|
gpiochip_free_own_desc().
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These functions must be used with care since they do not affect module use
|
|
|
|
count. Do not use the functions to request gpio descriptors not owned by the
|
|
|
|
calling driver.
|