linux/kernel/module/strict_rwx.c

100 lines
2.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
/*
* Module strict rwx
*
* Copyright (C) 2015 Rusty Russell
*/
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/set_memory.h>
#include "internal.h"
static int module_set_memory(const struct module *mod, enum mod_mem_type type,
int (*set_memory)(unsigned long start, int num_pages))
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
{
const struct module_memory *mod_mem = &mod->mem[type];
if (!mod_mem->base)
return 0;
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
set_vm_flush_reset_perms(mod_mem->base);
return set_memory((unsigned long)mod_mem->base, mod_mem->size >> PAGE_SHIFT);
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
}
/*
* Since some arches are moving towards PAGE_KERNEL module allocations instead
module: replace module_layout with module_memory module_layout manages different types of memory (text, data, rodata, etc.) in one allocation, which is problematic for some reasons: 1. It is hard to enable CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX. 2. It is hard to use huge pages in modules (and not break strict rwx). 3. Many archs uses module_layout for arch-specific data, but it is not obvious how these data are used (are they RO, RX, or RW?) Improve the scenario by replacing 2 (or 3) module_layout per module with up to 7 module_memory per module: MOD_TEXT, MOD_DATA, MOD_RODATA, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, MOD_INIT_TEXT, MOD_INIT_DATA, MOD_INIT_RODATA, and allocating them separately. This adds slightly more entries to mod_tree (from up to 3 entries per module, to up to 7 entries per module). However, this at most adds a small constant overhead to __module_address(), which is expected to be fast. Various archs use module_layout for different data. These data are put into different module_memory based on their location in module_layout. IOW, data that used to go with text is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_TEXT; data that used to go with data is allocated with MOD_MEM_TYPE_DATA, etc. module_memory simplifies quite some of the module code. For example, ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC is a lot cleaner, as it just uses a different allocator for the data. kernel/module/strict_rwx.c is also much cleaner with module_memory. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
2023-02-07 00:28:02 +00:00
* of PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC, keep module_enable_x() independent of
* CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX because they are needed regardless of whether we
* are strict.
*/
int module_enable_text_rox(const struct module *mod)
{
for_class_mod_mem_type(type, text) {
int ret;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
ret = module_set_memory(mod, type, set_memory_rox);
else
ret = module_set_memory(mod, type, set_memory_x);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
int module_enable_rodata_ro(const struct module *mod, bool after_init)
{
int ret;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) || !rodata_enabled)
return 0;
ret = module_set_memory(mod, MOD_RODATA, set_memory_ro);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = module_set_memory(mod, MOD_INIT_RODATA, set_memory_ro);
if (ret)
return ret;
if (after_init)
return module_set_memory(mod, MOD_RO_AFTER_INIT, set_memory_ro);
return 0;
}
int module_enable_data_nx(const struct module *mod)
{
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
return 0;
for_class_mod_mem_type(type, data) {
int ret = module_set_memory(mod, type, set_memory_nx);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
int module_enforce_rwx_sections(Elf_Ehdr *hdr, Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
char *secstrings, struct module *mod)
{
const unsigned long shf_wx = SHF_WRITE | SHF_EXECINSTR;
int i;
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX))
return 0;
for (i = 0; i < hdr->e_shnum; i++) {
if ((sechdrs[i].sh_flags & shf_wx) == shf_wx) {
pr_err("%s: section %s (index %d) has invalid WRITE|EXEC flags\n",
mod->name, secstrings + sechdrs[i].sh_name, i);
return -ENOEXEC;
}
}
return 0;
}