mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-25 04:11:49 +00:00
898 lines
27 KiB
C
898 lines
27 KiB
C
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
|
||
|
|
||
|
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
|
||
|
|
||
|
#include "futex.h"
|
||
|
#include "../locking/rtmutex_common.h"
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* On PREEMPT_RT, the hash bucket lock is a 'sleeping' spinlock with an
|
||
|
* underlying rtmutex. The task which is about to be requeued could have
|
||
|
* just woken up (timeout, signal). After the wake up the task has to
|
||
|
* acquire hash bucket lock, which is held by the requeue code. As a task
|
||
|
* can only be blocked on _ONE_ rtmutex at a time, the proxy lock blocking
|
||
|
* and the hash bucket lock blocking would collide and corrupt state.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* On !PREEMPT_RT this is not a problem and everything could be serialized
|
||
|
* on hash bucket lock, but aside of having the benefit of common code,
|
||
|
* this allows to avoid doing the requeue when the task is already on the
|
||
|
* way out and taking the hash bucket lock of the original uaddr1 when the
|
||
|
* requeue has been completed.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The following state transitions are valid:
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* On the waiter side:
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* On the requeue side:
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_INPROGRESS
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE (requeue failed)
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE/LOCKED
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT -> Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE (requeue failed)
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The requeue side ignores a waiter with state Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE as this
|
||
|
* signals that the waiter is already on the way out. It also means that
|
||
|
* the waiter is still on the 'wait' futex, i.e. uaddr1.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The waiter side signals early wakeup to the requeue side either through
|
||
|
* setting state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE or to Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT depending
|
||
|
* on the current state. In case of Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE it can immediately
|
||
|
* proceed to take the hash bucket lock of uaddr1. If it set state to WAIT,
|
||
|
* which means the wakeup is interleaving with a requeue in progress it has
|
||
|
* to wait for the requeue side to change the state. Either to DONE/LOCKED
|
||
|
* or to IGNORE. DONE/LOCKED means the waiter q is now on the uaddr2 futex
|
||
|
* and either blocked (DONE) or has acquired it (LOCKED). IGNORE is set by
|
||
|
* the requeue side when the requeue attempt failed via deadlock detection
|
||
|
* and therefore the waiter q is still on the uaddr1 futex.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
enum {
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE = 0,
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE,
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS,
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE,
|
||
|
Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED,
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
|
||
|
/* list gets initialized in futex_queue()*/
|
||
|
.key = FUTEX_KEY_INIT,
|
||
|
.bitset = FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY,
|
||
|
.requeue_state = ATOMIC_INIT(Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE),
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* requeue_futex() - Requeue a futex_q from one hb to another
|
||
|
* @q: the futex_q to requeue
|
||
|
* @hb1: the source hash_bucket
|
||
|
* @hb2: the target hash_bucket
|
||
|
* @key2: the new key for the requeued futex_q
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static inline
|
||
|
void requeue_futex(struct futex_q *q, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
|
||
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, union futex_key *key2)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* If key1 and key2 hash to the same bucket, no need to
|
||
|
* requeue.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (likely(&hb1->chain != &hb2->chain)) {
|
||
|
plist_del(&q->list, &hb1->chain);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb1);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
|
||
|
plist_add(&q->list, &hb2->chain);
|
||
|
q->lock_ptr = &hb2->lock;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
q->key = *key2;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
static inline bool futex_requeue_pi_prepare(struct futex_q *q,
|
||
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
int old, new;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Set state to Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS unless an early wakeup has
|
||
|
* already set Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE to signal that requeue should
|
||
|
* ignore the waiter.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
||
|
do {
|
||
|
if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
|
||
|
return false;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() might have set it to
|
||
|
* IN_PROGRESS and a interleaved early wake to WAIT.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* It was considered to have an extra state for that
|
||
|
* trylock, but that would just add more conditionals
|
||
|
* all over the place for a dubious value.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS;
|
||
|
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
||
|
|
||
|
q->pi_state = pi_state;
|
||
|
return true;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
static inline void futex_requeue_pi_complete(struct futex_q *q, int locked)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
int old, new;
|
||
|
|
||
|
old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
||
|
do {
|
||
|
if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE)
|
||
|
return;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (locked >= 0) {
|
||
|
/* Requeue succeeded. Set DONE or LOCKED */
|
||
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS &&
|
||
|
old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE + locked;
|
||
|
} else if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
|
||
|
/* Deadlock, no early wakeup interleave */
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE;
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
/* Deadlock, early wakeup interleave. */
|
||
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(old != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
||
|
|
||
|
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
|
||
|
/* If the waiter interleaved with the requeue let it know */
|
||
|
if (unlikely(old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT))
|
||
|
rcuwait_wake_up(&q->requeue_wait);
|
||
|
#endif
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
static inline int futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(struct futex_q *q)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
int old, new;
|
||
|
|
||
|
old = atomic_read_acquire(&q->requeue_state);
|
||
|
do {
|
||
|
/* Is requeue done already? */
|
||
|
if (old >= Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE)
|
||
|
return old;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* If not done, then tell the requeue code to either ignore
|
||
|
* the waiter or to wake it up once the requeue is done.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT;
|
||
|
if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE)
|
||
|
new = Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE;
|
||
|
} while (!atomic_try_cmpxchg(&q->requeue_state, &old, new));
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* If the requeue was in progress, wait for it to complete */
|
||
|
if (old == Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS) {
|
||
|
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
|
||
|
rcuwait_wait_event(&q->requeue_wait,
|
||
|
atomic_read(&q->requeue_state) != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT,
|
||
|
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||
|
#else
|
||
|
(void)atomic_cond_read_relaxed(&q->requeue_state, VAL != Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT);
|
||
|
#endif
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Requeue is now either prohibited or complete. Reread state
|
||
|
* because during the wait above it might have changed. Nothing
|
||
|
* will modify q->requeue_state after this point.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
return atomic_read(&q->requeue_state);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* requeue_pi_wake_futex() - Wake a task that acquired the lock during requeue
|
||
|
* @q: the futex_q
|
||
|
* @key: the key of the requeue target futex
|
||
|
* @hb: the hash_bucket of the requeue target futex
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* During futex_requeue, with requeue_pi=1, it is possible to acquire the
|
||
|
* target futex if it is uncontended or via a lock steal.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 1) Set @q::key to the requeue target futex key so the waiter can detect
|
||
|
* the wakeup on the right futex.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 2) Dequeue @q from the hash bucket.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 3) Set @q::rt_waiter to NULL so the woken up task can detect atomic lock
|
||
|
* acquisition.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 4) Set the q->lock_ptr to the requeue target hb->lock for the case that
|
||
|
* the waiter has to fixup the pi state.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 5) Complete the requeue state so the waiter can make progress. After
|
||
|
* this point the waiter task can return from the syscall immediately in
|
||
|
* case that the pi state does not have to be fixed up.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* 6) Wake the waiter task.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Must be called with both q->lock_ptr and hb->lock held.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static inline
|
||
|
void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key,
|
||
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
q->key = *key;
|
||
|
|
||
|
__futex_unqueue(q);
|
||
|
|
||
|
WARN_ON(!q->rt_waiter);
|
||
|
q->rt_waiter = NULL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Signal locked state to the waiter */
|
||
|
futex_requeue_pi_complete(q, 1);
|
||
|
wake_up_state(q->task, TASK_NORMAL);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() - Attempt an atomic lock for the top waiter
|
||
|
* @pifutex: the user address of the to futex
|
||
|
* @hb1: the from futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
|
||
|
* @hb2: the to futex hash bucket, must be locked by the caller
|
||
|
* @key1: the from futex key
|
||
|
* @key2: the to futex key
|
||
|
* @ps: address to store the pi_state pointer
|
||
|
* @exiting: Pointer to store the task pointer of the owner task
|
||
|
* which is in the middle of exiting
|
||
|
* @set_waiters: force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit (1) or not (0)
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Try and get the lock on behalf of the top waiter if we can do it atomically.
|
||
|
* Wake the top waiter if we succeed. If the caller specified set_waiters,
|
||
|
* then direct futex_lock_pi_atomic() to force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS bit.
|
||
|
* hb1 and hb2 must be held by the caller.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* @exiting is only set when the return value is -EBUSY. If so, this holds
|
||
|
* a refcount on the exiting task on return and the caller needs to drop it
|
||
|
* after waiting for the exit to complete.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Return:
|
||
|
* - 0 - failed to acquire the lock atomically;
|
||
|
* - >0 - acquired the lock, return value is vpid of the top_waiter
|
||
|
* - <0 - error
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static int
|
||
|
futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(u32 __user *pifutex, struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1,
|
||
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb2, union futex_key *key1,
|
||
|
union futex_key *key2, struct futex_pi_state **ps,
|
||
|
struct task_struct **exiting, int set_waiters)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
struct futex_q *top_waiter = NULL;
|
||
|
u32 curval;
|
||
|
int ret;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (futex_get_value_locked(&curval, pifutex))
|
||
|
return -EFAULT;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (unlikely(should_fail_futex(true)))
|
||
|
return -EFAULT;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Find the top_waiter and determine if there are additional waiters.
|
||
|
* If the caller intends to requeue more than 1 waiter to pifutex,
|
||
|
* force futex_lock_pi_atomic() to set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit now,
|
||
|
* as we have means to handle the possible fault. If not, don't set
|
||
|
* the bit unnecessarily as it will force the subsequent unlock to enter
|
||
|
* the kernel.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
top_waiter = futex_top_waiter(hb1, key1);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* There are no waiters, nothing for us to do. */
|
||
|
if (!top_waiter)
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Ensure that this is a waiter sitting in futex_wait_requeue_pi()
|
||
|
* and waiting on the 'waitqueue' futex which is always !PI.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (!top_waiter->rt_waiter || top_waiter->pi_state)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Ensure we requeue to the expected futex. */
|
||
|
if (!futex_match(top_waiter->requeue_pi_key, key2))
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Ensure that this does not race against an early wakeup */
|
||
|
if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(top_waiter, NULL))
|
||
|
return -EAGAIN;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Try to take the lock for top_waiter and set the FUTEX_WAITERS bit
|
||
|
* in the contended case or if @set_waiters is true.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* In the contended case PI state is attached to the lock owner. If
|
||
|
* the user space lock can be acquired then PI state is attached to
|
||
|
* the new owner (@top_waiter->task) when @set_waiters is true.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
ret = futex_lock_pi_atomic(pifutex, hb2, key2, ps, top_waiter->task,
|
||
|
exiting, set_waiters);
|
||
|
if (ret == 1) {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Lock was acquired in user space and PI state was
|
||
|
* attached to @top_waiter->task. That means state is fully
|
||
|
* consistent and the waiter can return to user space
|
||
|
* immediately after the wakeup.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
requeue_pi_wake_futex(top_waiter, key2, hb2);
|
||
|
} else if (ret < 0) {
|
||
|
/* Rewind top_waiter::requeue_state */
|
||
|
futex_requeue_pi_complete(top_waiter, ret);
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* futex_lock_pi_atomic() did not acquire the user space
|
||
|
* futex, but managed to establish the proxy lock and pi
|
||
|
* state. top_waiter::requeue_state cannot be fixed up here
|
||
|
* because the waiter is not enqueued on the rtmutex
|
||
|
* yet. This is handled at the callsite depending on the
|
||
|
* result of rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() which is
|
||
|
* guaranteed to be reached with this function returning 0.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* futex_requeue() - Requeue waiters from uaddr1 to uaddr2
|
||
|
* @uaddr1: source futex user address
|
||
|
* @flags: futex flags (FLAGS_SHARED, etc.)
|
||
|
* @uaddr2: target futex user address
|
||
|
* @nr_wake: number of waiters to wake (must be 1 for requeue_pi)
|
||
|
* @nr_requeue: number of waiters to requeue (0-INT_MAX)
|
||
|
* @cmpval: @uaddr1 expected value (or %NULL)
|
||
|
* @requeue_pi: if we are attempting to requeue from a non-pi futex to a
|
||
|
* pi futex (pi to pi requeue is not supported)
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Requeue waiters on uaddr1 to uaddr2. In the requeue_pi case, try to acquire
|
||
|
* uaddr2 atomically on behalf of the top waiter.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Return:
|
||
|
* - >=0 - on success, the number of tasks requeued or woken;
|
||
|
* - <0 - on error
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
int futex_requeue(u32 __user *uaddr1, unsigned int flags, u32 __user *uaddr2,
|
||
|
int nr_wake, int nr_requeue, u32 *cmpval, int requeue_pi)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
union futex_key key1 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT, key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
||
|
int task_count = 0, ret;
|
||
|
struct futex_pi_state *pi_state = NULL;
|
||
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb1, *hb2;
|
||
|
struct futex_q *this, *next;
|
||
|
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (nr_wake < 0 || nr_requeue < 0)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* When PI not supported: return -ENOSYS if requeue_pi is true,
|
||
|
* consequently the compiler knows requeue_pi is always false past
|
||
|
* this point which will optimize away all the conditional code
|
||
|
* further down.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI) && requeue_pi)
|
||
|
return -ENOSYS;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (requeue_pi) {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Requeue PI only works on two distinct uaddrs. This
|
||
|
* check is only valid for private futexes. See below.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (uaddr1 == uaddr2)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* futex_requeue() allows the caller to define the number
|
||
|
* of waiters to wake up via the @nr_wake argument. With
|
||
|
* REQUEUE_PI, waking up more than one waiter is creating
|
||
|
* more problems than it solves. Waking up a waiter makes
|
||
|
* only sense if the PI futex @uaddr2 is uncontended as
|
||
|
* this allows the requeue code to acquire the futex
|
||
|
* @uaddr2 before waking the waiter. The waiter can then
|
||
|
* return to user space without further action. A secondary
|
||
|
* wakeup would just make the futex_wait_requeue_pi()
|
||
|
* handling more complex, because that code would have to
|
||
|
* look up pi_state and do more or less all the handling
|
||
|
* which the requeue code has to do for the to be requeued
|
||
|
* waiters. So restrict the number of waiters to wake to
|
||
|
* one, and only wake it up when the PI futex is
|
||
|
* uncontended. Otherwise requeue it and let the unlock of
|
||
|
* the PI futex handle the wakeup.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* All REQUEUE_PI users, e.g. pthread_cond_signal() and
|
||
|
* pthread_cond_broadcast() must use nr_wake=1.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (nr_wake != 1)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* requeue_pi requires a pi_state, try to allocate it now
|
||
|
* without any locks in case it fails.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (refill_pi_state_cache())
|
||
|
return -ENOMEM;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
retry:
|
||
|
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr1, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key1, FUTEX_READ);
|
||
|
if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key2,
|
||
|
requeue_pi ? FUTEX_WRITE : FUTEX_READ);
|
||
|
if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
|
||
|
* shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (requeue_pi && futex_match(&key1, &key2))
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
hb1 = futex_hash(&key1);
|
||
|
hb2 = futex_hash(&key2);
|
||
|
|
||
|
retry_private:
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_inc(hb2);
|
||
|
double_lock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (likely(cmpval != NULL)) {
|
||
|
u32 curval;
|
||
|
|
||
|
ret = futex_get_value_locked(&curval, uaddr1);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
||
|
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
||
|
|
||
|
ret = get_user(curval, uaddr1);
|
||
|
if (ret)
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (!(flags & FLAGS_SHARED))
|
||
|
goto retry_private;
|
||
|
|
||
|
goto retry;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
if (curval != *cmpval) {
|
||
|
ret = -EAGAIN;
|
||
|
goto out_unlock;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (requeue_pi) {
|
||
|
struct task_struct *exiting = NULL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Attempt to acquire uaddr2 and wake the top waiter. If we
|
||
|
* intend to requeue waiters, force setting the FUTEX_WAITERS
|
||
|
* bit. We force this here where we are able to easily handle
|
||
|
* faults rather in the requeue loop below.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Updates topwaiter::requeue_state if a top waiter exists.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
ret = futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(uaddr2, hb1, hb2, &key1,
|
||
|
&key2, &pi_state,
|
||
|
&exiting, nr_requeue);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* At this point the top_waiter has either taken uaddr2 or
|
||
|
* is waiting on it. In both cases pi_state has been
|
||
|
* established and an initial refcount on it. In case of an
|
||
|
* error there's nothing.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The top waiter's requeue_state is up to date:
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* - If the lock was acquired atomically (ret == 1), then
|
||
|
* the state is Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The top waiter has been dequeued and woken up and can
|
||
|
* return to user space immediately. The kernel/user
|
||
|
* space state is consistent. In case that there must be
|
||
|
* more waiters requeued the WAITERS bit in the user
|
||
|
* space futex is set so the top waiter task has to go
|
||
|
* into the syscall slowpath to unlock the futex. This
|
||
|
* will block until this requeue operation has been
|
||
|
* completed and the hash bucket locks have been
|
||
|
* dropped.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* - If the trylock failed with an error (ret < 0) then
|
||
|
* the state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_NONE, i.e. "nothing
|
||
|
* happened", or Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE when there was an
|
||
|
* interleaved early wakeup.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* - If the trylock did not succeed (ret == 0) then the
|
||
|
* state is either Q_REQUEUE_PI_IN_PROGRESS or
|
||
|
* Q_REQUEUE_PI_WAIT if an early wakeup interleaved.
|
||
|
* This will be cleaned up in the loop below, which
|
||
|
* cannot fail because futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() did
|
||
|
* the same sanity checks for requeue_pi as the loop
|
||
|
* below does.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
switch (ret) {
|
||
|
case 0:
|
||
|
/* We hold a reference on the pi state. */
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
case 1:
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic() acquired the user space
|
||
|
* futex. Adjust task_count.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
task_count++;
|
||
|
ret = 0;
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* If the above failed, then pi_state is NULL and
|
||
|
* waiter::requeue_state is correct.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
case -EFAULT:
|
||
|
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
||
|
ret = fault_in_user_writeable(uaddr2);
|
||
|
if (!ret)
|
||
|
goto retry;
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
case -EBUSY:
|
||
|
case -EAGAIN:
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Two reasons for this:
|
||
|
* - EBUSY: Owner is exiting and we just wait for the
|
||
|
* exit to complete.
|
||
|
* - EAGAIN: The user space value changed.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Handle the case where the owner is in the middle of
|
||
|
* exiting. Wait for the exit to complete otherwise
|
||
|
* this task might loop forever, aka. live lock.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
wait_for_owner_exiting(ret, exiting);
|
||
|
cond_resched();
|
||
|
goto retry;
|
||
|
default:
|
||
|
goto out_unlock;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
plist_for_each_entry_safe(this, next, &hb1->chain, list) {
|
||
|
if (task_count - nr_wake >= nr_requeue)
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (!futex_match(&this->key, &key1))
|
||
|
continue;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI should always
|
||
|
* be paired with each other and no other futex ops.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* We should never be requeueing a futex_q with a pi_state,
|
||
|
* which is awaiting a futex_unlock_pi().
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if ((requeue_pi && !this->rt_waiter) ||
|
||
|
(!requeue_pi && this->rt_waiter) ||
|
||
|
this->pi_state) {
|
||
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Plain futexes just wake or requeue and are done */
|
||
|
if (!requeue_pi) {
|
||
|
if (++task_count <= nr_wake)
|
||
|
futex_wake_mark(&wake_q, this);
|
||
|
else
|
||
|
requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
|
||
|
continue;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Ensure we requeue to the expected futex for requeue_pi. */
|
||
|
if (!futex_match(this->requeue_pi_key, &key2)) {
|
||
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Requeue nr_requeue waiters and possibly one more in the case
|
||
|
* of requeue_pi if we couldn't acquire the lock atomically.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Prepare the waiter to take the rt_mutex. Take a refcount
|
||
|
* on the pi_state and store the pointer in the futex_q
|
||
|
* object of the waiter.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
get_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Don't requeue when the waiter is already on the way out. */
|
||
|
if (!futex_requeue_pi_prepare(this, pi_state)) {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Early woken waiter signaled that it is on the
|
||
|
* way out. Drop the pi_state reference and try the
|
||
|
* next waiter. @this->pi_state is still NULL.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||
|
continue;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
ret = rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&pi_state->pi_mutex,
|
||
|
this->rt_waiter,
|
||
|
this->task);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (ret == 1) {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We got the lock. We do neither drop the refcount
|
||
|
* on pi_state nor clear this->pi_state because the
|
||
|
* waiter needs the pi_state for cleaning up the
|
||
|
* user space value. It will drop the refcount
|
||
|
* after doing so. this::requeue_state is updated
|
||
|
* in the wakeup as well.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
requeue_pi_wake_futex(this, &key2, hb2);
|
||
|
task_count++;
|
||
|
} else if (!ret) {
|
||
|
/* Waiter is queued, move it to hb2 */
|
||
|
requeue_futex(this, hb1, hb2, &key2);
|
||
|
futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, 0);
|
||
|
task_count++;
|
||
|
} else {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() detected a potential
|
||
|
* deadlock when we tried to queue that waiter.
|
||
|
* Drop the pi_state reference which we took above
|
||
|
* and remove the pointer to the state from the
|
||
|
* waiters futex_q object.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
this->pi_state = NULL;
|
||
|
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||
|
futex_requeue_pi_complete(this, ret);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We stop queueing more waiters and let user space
|
||
|
* deal with the mess.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We took an extra initial reference to the pi_state in
|
||
|
* futex_proxy_trylock_atomic(). We need to drop it here again.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
put_pi_state(pi_state);
|
||
|
|
||
|
out_unlock:
|
||
|
double_unlock_hb(hb1, hb2);
|
||
|
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb2);
|
||
|
return ret ? ret : task_count;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() - Handle early wakeup on the initial futex
|
||
|
* @hb: the hash_bucket futex_q was original enqueued on
|
||
|
* @q: the futex_q woken while waiting to be requeued
|
||
|
* @timeout: the timeout associated with the wait (NULL if none)
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Determine the cause for the early wakeup.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Return:
|
||
|
* -EWOULDBLOCK or -ETIMEDOUT or -ERESTARTNOINTR
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
static inline
|
||
|
int handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb,
|
||
|
struct futex_q *q,
|
||
|
struct hrtimer_sleeper *timeout)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
int ret;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* With the hb lock held, we avoid races while we process the wakeup.
|
||
|
* We only need to hold hb (and not hb2) to ensure atomicity as the
|
||
|
* wakeup code can't change q.key from uaddr to uaddr2 if we hold hb.
|
||
|
* It can't be requeued from uaddr2 to something else since we don't
|
||
|
* support a PI aware source futex for requeue.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(&hb->lock != q->lock_ptr);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We were woken prior to requeue by a timeout or a signal.
|
||
|
* Unqueue the futex_q and determine which it was.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
|
||
|
futex_hb_waiters_dec(hb);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Handle spurious wakeups gracefully */
|
||
|
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
||
|
if (timeout && !timeout->task)
|
||
|
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
|
||
|
else if (signal_pending(current))
|
||
|
ret = -ERESTARTNOINTR;
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/**
|
||
|
* futex_wait_requeue_pi() - Wait on uaddr and take uaddr2
|
||
|
* @uaddr: the futex we initially wait on (non-pi)
|
||
|
* @flags: futex flags (FLAGS_SHARED, FLAGS_CLOCKRT, etc.), they must be
|
||
|
* the same type, no requeueing from private to shared, etc.
|
||
|
* @val: the expected value of uaddr
|
||
|
* @abs_time: absolute timeout
|
||
|
* @bitset: 32 bit wakeup bitset set by userspace, defaults to all
|
||
|
* @uaddr2: the pi futex we will take prior to returning to user-space
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* The caller will wait on uaddr and will be requeued by futex_requeue() to
|
||
|
* uaddr2 which must be PI aware and unique from uaddr. Normal wakeup will wake
|
||
|
* on uaddr2 and complete the acquisition of the rt_mutex prior to returning to
|
||
|
* userspace. This ensures the rt_mutex maintains an owner when it has waiters;
|
||
|
* without one, the pi logic would not know which task to boost/deboost, if
|
||
|
* there was a need to.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* We call schedule in futex_wait_queue() when we enqueue and return there
|
||
|
* via the following--
|
||
|
* 1) wakeup on uaddr2 after an atomic lock acquisition by futex_requeue()
|
||
|
* 2) wakeup on uaddr2 after a requeue
|
||
|
* 3) signal
|
||
|
* 4) timeout
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* If 3, cleanup and return -ERESTARTNOINTR.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* If 2, we may then block on trying to take the rt_mutex and return via:
|
||
|
* 5) successful lock
|
||
|
* 6) signal
|
||
|
* 7) timeout
|
||
|
* 8) other lock acquisition failure
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* If 6, return -EWOULDBLOCK (restarting the syscall would do the same).
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* If 4 or 7, we cleanup and return with -ETIMEDOUT.
|
||
|
*
|
||
|
* Return:
|
||
|
* - 0 - On success;
|
||
|
* - <0 - On error
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags,
|
||
|
u32 val, ktime_t *abs_time, u32 bitset,
|
||
|
u32 __user *uaddr2)
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to;
|
||
|
struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter;
|
||
|
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
|
||
|
union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT;
|
||
|
struct futex_q q = futex_q_init;
|
||
|
struct rt_mutex_base *pi_mutex;
|
||
|
int res, ret;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FUTEX_PI))
|
||
|
return -ENOSYS;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (uaddr == uaddr2)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (!bitset)
|
||
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||
|
|
||
|
to = futex_setup_timer(abs_time, &timeout, flags,
|
||
|
current->timer_slack_ns);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* The waiter is allocated on our stack, manipulated by the requeue
|
||
|
* code while we sleep on uaddr.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
rt_mutex_init_waiter(&rt_waiter);
|
||
|
|
||
|
ret = get_futex_key(uaddr2, flags & FLAGS_SHARED, &key2, FUTEX_WRITE);
|
||
|
if (unlikely(ret != 0))
|
||
|
goto out;
|
||
|
|
||
|
q.bitset = bitset;
|
||
|
q.rt_waiter = &rt_waiter;
|
||
|
q.requeue_pi_key = &key2;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Prepare to wait on uaddr. On success, it holds hb->lock and q
|
||
|
* is initialized.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, flags, &q, &hb);
|
||
|
if (ret)
|
||
|
goto out;
|
||
|
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* The check above which compares uaddrs is not sufficient for
|
||
|
* shared futexes. We need to compare the keys:
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (futex_match(&q.key, &key2)) {
|
||
|
futex_q_unlock(hb);
|
||
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||
|
goto out;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Queue the futex_q, drop the hb lock, wait for wakeup. */
|
||
|
futex_wait_queue(hb, &q, to);
|
||
|
|
||
|
switch (futex_requeue_pi_wakeup_sync(&q)) {
|
||
|
case Q_REQUEUE_PI_IGNORE:
|
||
|
/* The waiter is still on uaddr1 */
|
||
|
spin_lock(&hb->lock);
|
||
|
ret = handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup(hb, &q, to);
|
||
|
spin_unlock(&hb->lock);
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
case Q_REQUEUE_PI_LOCKED:
|
||
|
/* The requeue acquired the lock */
|
||
|
if (q.pi_state && (q.pi_state->owner != current)) {
|
||
|
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||
|
ret = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr2, &q, true);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Drop the reference to the pi state which the
|
||
|
* requeue_pi() code acquired for us.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
put_pi_state(q.pi_state);
|
||
|
spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Adjust the return value. It's either -EFAULT or
|
||
|
* success (1) but the caller expects 0 for success.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
ret = ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
|
||
|
case Q_REQUEUE_PI_DONE:
|
||
|
/* Requeue completed. Current is 'pi_blocked_on' the rtmutex */
|
||
|
pi_mutex = &q.pi_state->pi_mutex;
|
||
|
ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
|
||
|
|
||
|
/* Current is not longer pi_blocked_on */
|
||
|
spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||
|
if (ret && !rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(pi_mutex, &rt_waiter))
|
||
|
ret = 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&rt_waiter);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* Fixup the pi_state owner and possibly acquire the lock if we
|
||
|
* haven't already.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
res = fixup_pi_owner(uaddr2, &q, !ret);
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* If fixup_pi_owner() returned an error, propagate that. If it
|
||
|
* acquired the lock, clear -ETIMEDOUT or -EINTR.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
if (res)
|
||
|
ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
futex_unqueue_pi(&q);
|
||
|
spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (ret == -EINTR) {
|
||
|
/*
|
||
|
* We've already been requeued, but cannot restart
|
||
|
* by calling futex_lock_pi() directly. We could
|
||
|
* restart this syscall, but it would detect that
|
||
|
* the user space "val" changed and return
|
||
|
* -EWOULDBLOCK. Save the overhead of the restart
|
||
|
* and return -EWOULDBLOCK directly.
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
default:
|
||
|
BUG();
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
out:
|
||
|
if (to) {
|
||
|
hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer);
|
||
|
destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to->timer);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
return ret;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|