linux/fs/btrfs/block-group.c

4052 lines
119 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
#include "misc.h"
#include "ctree.h"
#include "block-group.h"
#include "space-info.h"
#include "disk-io.h"
#include "free-space-cache.h"
#include "free-space-tree.h"
#include "volumes.h"
#include "transaction.h"
#include "ref-verify.h"
#include "sysfs.h"
#include "tree-log.h"
#include "delalloc-space.h"
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
#include "discard.h"
#include "raid56.h"
#include "zoned.h"
/*
* Return target flags in extended format or 0 if restripe for this chunk_type
* is not in progress
*
* Should be called with balance_lock held
*/
static u64 get_restripe_target(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
{
struct btrfs_balance_control *bctl = fs_info->balance_ctl;
u64 target = 0;
if (!bctl)
return 0;
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA &&
bctl->data.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
target = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | bctl->data.target;
} else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM &&
bctl->sys.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
target = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | bctl->sys.target;
} else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA &&
bctl->meta.flags & BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_CONVERT) {
target = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | bctl->meta.target;
}
return target;
}
/*
* @flags: available profiles in extended format (see ctree.h)
*
* Return reduced profile in chunk format. If profile changing is in progress
* (either running or paused) picks the target profile (if it's already
* available), otherwise falls back to plain reducing.
*/
static u64 btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
{
u64 num_devices = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices;
u64 target;
u64 raid_type;
u64 allowed = 0;
/*
* See if restripe for this chunk_type is in progress, if so try to
* reduce to the target profile
*/
spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
target = get_restripe_target(fs_info, flags);
if (target) {
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
return extended_to_chunk(target);
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock);
/* First, mask out the RAID levels which aren't possible */
for (raid_type = 0; raid_type < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; raid_type++) {
if (num_devices >= btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].devs_min)
allowed |= btrfs_raid_array[raid_type].bg_flag;
}
allowed &= flags;
if (allowed & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6)
allowed = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6;
else if (allowed & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5)
allowed = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5;
else if (allowed & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)
allowed = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10;
else if (allowed & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1)
allowed = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1;
else if (allowed & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0)
allowed = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0;
flags &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK;
return extended_to_chunk(flags | allowed);
}
u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 orig_flags)
{
unsigned seq;
u64 flags;
do {
flags = orig_flags;
seq = read_seqbegin(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
flags |= fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits;
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
flags |= fs_info->avail_system_alloc_bits;
else if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
flags |= fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits;
} while (read_seqretry(&fs_info->profiles_lock, seq));
return btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(fs_info, flags);
}
void btrfs_get_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
refcount_inc(&cache->refs);
}
void btrfs_put_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&cache->refs)) {
WARN_ON(cache->pinned > 0);
WARN_ON(cache->reserved > 0);
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
/*
* A block_group shouldn't be on the discard_list anymore.
* Remove the block_group from the discard_list to prevent us
* from causing a panic due to NULL pointer dereference.
*/
if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&cache->discard_list)))
btrfs_discard_cancel_work(&cache->fs_info->discard_ctl,
cache);
/*
* If not empty, someone is still holding mutex of
* full_stripe_lock, which can only be released by caller.
* And it will definitely cause use-after-free when caller
* tries to release full stripe lock.
*
* No better way to resolve, but only to warn.
*/
WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&cache->full_stripe_locks_root.root));
kfree(cache->free_space_ctl);
kfree(cache->physical_map);
kfree(cache);
}
}
/*
* This adds the block group to the fs_info rb tree for the block group cache
*/
static int btrfs_add_block_group_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
{
struct rb_node **p;
struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
ASSERT(block_group->length != 0);
spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
p = &info->block_group_cache_tree.rb_node;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
cache = rb_entry(parent, struct btrfs_block_group, cache_node);
if (block_group->start < cache->start) {
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
} else if (block_group->start > cache->start) {
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
} else {
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
return -EEXIST;
}
}
rb_link_node(&block_group->cache_node, parent, p);
rb_insert_color(&block_group->cache_node,
&info->block_group_cache_tree);
if (info->first_logical_byte > block_group->start)
info->first_logical_byte = block_group->start;
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
return 0;
}
/*
* This will return the block group at or after bytenr if contains is 0, else
* it will return the block group that contains the bytenr
*/
static struct btrfs_block_group *block_group_cache_tree_search(
struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 bytenr, int contains)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *cache, *ret = NULL;
struct rb_node *n;
u64 end, start;
spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
n = info->block_group_cache_tree.rb_node;
while (n) {
cache = rb_entry(n, struct btrfs_block_group, cache_node);
end = cache->start + cache->length - 1;
start = cache->start;
if (bytenr < start) {
if (!contains && (!ret || start < ret->start))
ret = cache;
n = n->rb_left;
} else if (bytenr > start) {
if (contains && bytenr <= end) {
ret = cache;
break;
}
n = n->rb_right;
} else {
ret = cache;
break;
}
}
if (ret) {
btrfs_get_block_group(ret);
if (bytenr == 0 && info->first_logical_byte > ret->start)
info->first_logical_byte = ret->start;
}
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
return ret;
}
/*
* Return the block group that starts at or after bytenr
*/
struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(
struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 bytenr)
{
return block_group_cache_tree_search(info, bytenr, 0);
}
/*
* Return the block group that contains the given bytenr
*/
struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_lookup_block_group(
struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 bytenr)
{
return block_group_cache_tree_search(info, bytenr, 1);
}
struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_next_block_group(
struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = cache->fs_info;
struct rb_node *node;
spin_lock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
/* If our block group was removed, we need a full search. */
if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&cache->cache_node)) {
const u64 next_bytenr = cache->start + cache->length;
spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
cache = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(fs_info, next_bytenr); return cache;
}
node = rb_next(&cache->cache_node);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
if (node) {
cache = rb_entry(node, struct btrfs_block_group, cache_node);
btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
} else
cache = NULL;
spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
return cache;
}
bool btrfs_inc_nocow_writers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
bool ret = true;
bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, bytenr);
if (!bg)
return false;
spin_lock(&bg->lock);
if (bg->ro)
ret = false;
else
atomic_inc(&bg->nocow_writers);
spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
/* No put on block group, done by btrfs_dec_nocow_writers */
if (!ret)
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_dec_nocow_writers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 bytenr)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, bytenr);
ASSERT(bg);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bg->nocow_writers))
wake_up_var(&bg->nocow_writers);
/*
* Once for our lookup and once for the lookup done by a previous call
* to btrfs_inc_nocow_writers()
*/
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
}
void btrfs_wait_nocow_writers(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
wait_var_event(&bg->nocow_writers, !atomic_read(&bg->nocow_writers));
}
void btrfs_dec_block_group_reservations(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
const u64 start)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, start);
ASSERT(bg);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&bg->reservations))
wake_up_var(&bg->reservations);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
}
void btrfs_wait_block_group_reservations(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = bg->space_info;
ASSERT(bg->ro);
if (!(bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))
return;
/*
* Our block group is read only but before we set it to read only,
* some task might have had allocated an extent from it already, but it
* has not yet created a respective ordered extent (and added it to a
* root's list of ordered extents).
* Therefore wait for any task currently allocating extents, since the
* block group's reservations counter is incremented while a read lock
* on the groups' semaphore is held and decremented after releasing
* the read access on that semaphore and creating the ordered extent.
*/
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
wait_var_event(&bg->reservations, !atomic_read(&bg->reservations));
}
struct btrfs_caching_control *btrfs_get_caching_control(
struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_caching_control *ctl;
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (!cache->caching_ctl) {
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
return NULL;
}
ctl = cache->caching_ctl;
refcount_inc(&ctl->count);
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
return ctl;
}
void btrfs_put_caching_control(struct btrfs_caching_control *ctl)
{
if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ctl->count))
kfree(ctl);
}
/*
* When we wait for progress in the block group caching, its because our
* allocation attempt failed at least once. So, we must sleep and let some
* progress happen before we try again.
*
* This function will sleep at least once waiting for new free space to show
* up, and then it will check the block group free space numbers for our min
* num_bytes. Another option is to have it go ahead and look in the rbtree for
* a free extent of a given size, but this is a good start.
*
* Callers of this must check if cache->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR before using
* any of the information in this block group.
*/
void btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_progress(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
u64 num_bytes)
{
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
caching_ctl = btrfs_get_caching_control(cache);
if (!caching_ctl)
return;
wait_event(caching_ctl->wait, btrfs_block_group_done(cache) ||
(cache->free_space_ctl->free_space >= num_bytes));
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
}
int btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
int ret = 0;
caching_ctl = btrfs_get_caching_control(cache);
if (!caching_ctl)
return (cache->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR) ? -EIO : 0;
wait_event(caching_ctl->wait, btrfs_block_group_done(cache));
if (cache->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR)
ret = -EIO;
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
return ret;
}
static bool space_cache_v1_done(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
bool ret;
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
ret = cache->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_FAST;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl)
{
wait_event(caching_ctl->wait, space_cache_v1_done(cache));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
static void fragment_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
u64 start = block_group->start;
u64 len = block_group->length;
u64 chunk = block_group->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA ?
fs_info->nodesize : fs_info->sectorsize;
u64 step = chunk << 1;
while (len > chunk) {
btrfs_remove_free_space(block_group, start, chunk);
start += step;
if (len < step)
len = 0;
else
len -= step;
}
}
#endif
/*
* This is only called by btrfs_cache_block_group, since we could have freed
* extents we need to check the pinned_extents for any extents that can't be
* used yet since their free space will be released as soon as the transaction
* commits.
*/
u64 add_new_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group, u64 start, u64 end)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *info = block_group->fs_info;
u64 extent_start, extent_end, size, total_added = 0;
int ret;
while (start < end) {
ret = find_first_extent_bit(&info->excluded_extents, start,
&extent_start, &extent_end,
EXTENT_DIRTY | EXTENT_UPTODATE,
NULL);
if (ret)
break;
if (extent_start <= start) {
start = extent_end + 1;
} else if (extent_start > start && extent_start < end) {
size = extent_start - start;
total_added += size;
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
ret = btrfs_add_free_space_async_trimmed(block_group,
start, size);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or logic error */
start = extent_end + 1;
} else {
break;
}
}
if (start < end) {
size = end - start;
total_added += size;
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
ret = btrfs_add_free_space_async_trimmed(block_group, start,
size);
BUG_ON(ret); /* -ENOMEM or logic error */
}
return total_added;
}
static int load_extent_tree_free(struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group = caching_ctl->block_group;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
struct btrfs_root *extent_root = fs_info->extent_root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
struct btrfs_key key;
u64 total_found = 0;
u64 last = 0;
u32 nritems;
int ret;
bool wakeup = true;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
last = max_t(u64, block_group->start, BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
/*
* If we're fragmenting we don't want to make anybody think we can
* allocate from this block group until we've had a chance to fragment
* the free space.
*/
if (btrfs_should_fragment_free_space(block_group))
wakeup = false;
#endif
/*
* We don't want to deadlock with somebody trying to allocate a new
* extent for the extent root while also trying to search the extent
* root to add free space. So we skip locking and search the commit
* root, since its read-only
*/
path->skip_locking = 1;
path->search_commit_root = 1;
path->reada = READA_FORWARD;
key.objectid = last;
key.offset = 0;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY;
next:
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, extent_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
while (1) {
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info) > 1) {
last = (u64)-1;
break;
}
if (path->slots[0] < nritems) {
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
} else {
ret = btrfs_find_next_key(extent_root, path, &key, 0, 0);
if (ret)
break;
if (need_resched() ||
rwsem_is_contended(&fs_info->commit_root_sem)) {
if (wakeup)
caching_ctl->progress = last;
btrfs_release_path(path);
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
cond_resched();
mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
goto next;
}
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(extent_root, path);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
if (ret)
break;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
continue;
}
if (key.objectid < last) {
key.objectid = last;
key.offset = 0;
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY;
if (wakeup)
caching_ctl->progress = last;
btrfs_release_path(path);
goto next;
}
if (key.objectid < block_group->start) {
path->slots[0]++;
continue;
}
if (key.objectid >= block_group->start + block_group->length)
break;
if (key.type == BTRFS_EXTENT_ITEM_KEY ||
key.type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY) {
total_found += add_new_free_space(block_group, last,
key.objectid);
if (key.type == BTRFS_METADATA_ITEM_KEY)
last = key.objectid +
fs_info->nodesize;
else
last = key.objectid + key.offset;
if (total_found > CACHING_CTL_WAKE_UP) {
total_found = 0;
if (wakeup)
wake_up(&caching_ctl->wait);
}
}
path->slots[0]++;
}
ret = 0;
total_found += add_new_free_space(block_group, last,
block_group->start + block_group->length);
caching_ctl->progress = (u64)-1;
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
static noinline void caching_thread(struct btrfs_work *work)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info;
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
int ret;
caching_ctl = container_of(work, struct btrfs_caching_control, work);
block_group = caching_ctl->block_group;
fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
down_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE)) {
ret = load_free_space_cache(block_group);
if (ret == 1) {
ret = 0;
goto done;
}
/*
* We failed to load the space cache, set ourselves to
* CACHE_STARTED and carry on.
*/
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
block_group->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
wake_up(&caching_ctl->wait);
}
btrfs: fix possible free space tree corruption with online conversion While running btrfs/011 in a loop I would often ASSERT() while trying to add a new free space entry that already existed, or get an EEXIST while adding a new block to the extent tree, which is another indication of double allocation. This occurs because when we do the free space tree population, we create the new root and then populate the tree and commit the transaction. The problem is when you create a new root, the root node and commit root node are the same. During this initial transaction commit we will run all of the delayed refs that were paused during the free space tree generation, and thus begin to cache block groups. While caching block groups the caching thread will be reading from the main root for the free space tree, so as we make allocations we'll be changing the free space tree, which can cause us to add the same range twice which results in either the ASSERT(ret != -EEXIST); in __btrfs_add_free_space, or in a variety of different errors when running delayed refs because of a double allocation. Fix this by marking the fs_info as unsafe to load the free space tree, and fall back on the old slow method. We could be smarter than this, for example caching the block group while we're populating the free space tree, but since this is a serious problem I've opted for the simplest solution. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+ Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-01-15 21:26:17 +00:00
/*
* If we are in the transaction that populated the free space tree we
* can't actually cache from the free space tree as our commit root and
* real root are the same, so we could change the contents of the blocks
* while caching. Instead do the slow caching in this case, and after
* the transaction has committed we will be safe.
*/
if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(fs_info, FREE_SPACE_TREE) &&
!(test_bit(BTRFS_FS_FREE_SPACE_TREE_UNTRUSTED, &fs_info->flags)))
ret = load_free_space_tree(caching_ctl);
else
ret = load_extent_tree_free(caching_ctl);
done:
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
block_group->caching_ctl = NULL;
block_group->cached = ret ? BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR : BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
if (btrfs_should_fragment_free_space(block_group)) {
u64 bytes_used;
spin_lock(&block_group->space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
bytes_used = block_group->length - block_group->used;
block_group->space_info->bytes_used += bytes_used >> 1;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
spin_unlock(&block_group->space_info->lock);
fragment_free_space(block_group);
}
#endif
caching_ctl->progress = (u64)-1;
up_read(&fs_info->commit_root_sem);
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(block_group);
mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
wake_up(&caching_ctl->wait);
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
int btrfs_cache_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, int load_cache_only)
{
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = cache->fs_info;
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl = NULL;
int ret = 0;
/* Allocator for zoned filesystems does not use the cache at all */
if (btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info))
return 0;
caching_ctl = kzalloc(sizeof(*caching_ctl), GFP_NOFS);
if (!caching_ctl)
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&caching_ctl->list);
mutex_init(&caching_ctl->mutex);
init_waitqueue_head(&caching_ctl->wait);
caching_ctl->block_group = cache;
caching_ctl->progress = cache->start;
refcount_set(&caching_ctl->count, 2);
btrfs_init_work(&caching_ctl->work, caching_thread, NULL, NULL);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (cache->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_NO) {
kfree(caching_ctl);
caching_ctl = cache->caching_ctl;
if (caching_ctl)
refcount_inc(&caching_ctl->count);
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
goto out;
}
WARN_ON(cache->caching_ctl);
cache->caching_ctl = caching_ctl;
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE))
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FAST;
else
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED;
cache->has_caching_ctl = 1;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_lock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
refcount_inc(&caching_ctl->count);
list_add_tail(&caching_ctl->list, &fs_info->caching_block_groups);
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
btrfs_queue_work(fs_info->caching_workers, &caching_ctl->work);
out:
if (load_cache_only && caching_ctl)
btrfs_wait_space_cache_v1_finished(cache, caching_ctl);
if (caching_ctl)
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
return ret;
}
static void clear_avail_alloc_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
{
u64 extra_flags = chunk_to_extended(flags) &
BTRFS_EXTENDED_PROFILE_MASK;
write_seqlock(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits &= ~extra_flags;
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits &= ~extra_flags;
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
fs_info->avail_system_alloc_bits &= ~extra_flags;
write_sequnlock(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
}
/*
* Clear incompat bits for the following feature(s):
*
* - RAID56 - in case there's neither RAID5 nor RAID6 profile block group
* in the whole filesystem
*
* - RAID1C34 - same as above for RAID1C3 and RAID1C4 block groups
*/
static void clear_incompat_bg_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
{
bool found_raid56 = false;
bool found_raid1c34 = false;
if ((flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK) ||
(flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C3) ||
(flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1C4)) {
struct list_head *head = &fs_info->space_info;
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo;
list_for_each_entry_rcu(sinfo, head, list) {
down_read(&sinfo->groups_sem);
if (!list_empty(&sinfo->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_RAID5]))
found_raid56 = true;
if (!list_empty(&sinfo->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_RAID6]))
found_raid56 = true;
if (!list_empty(&sinfo->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C3]))
found_raid1c34 = true;
if (!list_empty(&sinfo->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_RAID1C4]))
found_raid1c34 = true;
up_read(&sinfo->groups_sem);
}
if (!found_raid56)
btrfs_clear_fs_incompat(fs_info, RAID56);
if (!found_raid1c34)
btrfs_clear_fs_incompat(fs_info, RAID1C34);
}
}
static int remove_block_group_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_root *root;
struct btrfs_key key;
int ret;
root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
key.objectid = block_group->start;
key.type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = block_group->length;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, root, path);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 group_start, struct extent_map *em)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
struct btrfs_free_cluster *cluster;
struct inode *inode;
struct kobject *kobj = NULL;
int ret;
int index;
int factor;
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl = NULL;
bool remove_em;
bool remove_rsv = false;
block_group = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, group_start);
BUG_ON(!block_group);
BUG_ON(!block_group->ro);
trace_btrfs_remove_block_group(block_group);
/*
* Free the reserved super bytes from this block group before
* remove it.
*/
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(block_group);
btrfs_free_ref_tree_range(fs_info, block_group->start,
block_group->length);
index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(block_group->flags);
factor = btrfs_bg_type_to_factor(block_group->flags);
/* make sure this block group isn't part of an allocation cluster */
cluster = &fs_info->data_alloc_cluster;
spin_lock(&cluster->refill_lock);
btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(block_group, cluster);
spin_unlock(&cluster->refill_lock);
/*
* make sure this block group isn't part of a metadata
* allocation cluster
*/
cluster = &fs_info->meta_alloc_cluster;
spin_lock(&cluster->refill_lock);
btrfs_return_cluster_to_free_space(block_group, cluster);
spin_unlock(&cluster->refill_lock);
btrfs_clear_treelog_bg(block_group);
2021-09-08 16:19:26 +00:00
btrfs_clear_data_reloc_bg(block_group);
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
btrfs: fix a block group ref counter leak after failure to remove block group When removing a block group, if we fail to delete the block group's item from the extent tree, we jump to the 'out' label and end up decrementing the block group's reference count once only (by 1), resulting in a counter leak because the block group at that point was already removed from the block group cache rbtree - so we have to decrement the reference count twice, once for the rbtree and once for our lookup at the start of the function. There is a second bug where if removing the free space tree entries (the call to remove_block_group_free_space()) fails we end up jumping to the 'out_put_group' label but end up decrementing the reference count only once, when we should have done it twice, since we have already removed the block group from the block group cache rbtree. This happens because the reference count decrement for the rbtree reference happens after attempting to remove the free space tree entries, which is far away from the place where we remove the block group from the rbtree. To make things less error prone, decrement the reference count for the rbtree immediately after removing the block group from it. This also eleminates the need for two different exit labels on error, renaming 'out_put_label' to just 'out' and removing the old 'out'. Fixes: f6033c5e333238 ("btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-06-01 18:12:06 +00:00
goto out;
}
/*
* get the inode first so any iput calls done for the io_list
* aren't the final iput (no unlinks allowed now)
*/
inode = lookup_free_space_inode(block_group, path);
mutex_lock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
/*
* Make sure our free space cache IO is done before removing the
* free space inode
*/
spin_lock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
if (!list_empty(&block_group->io_list)) {
list_del_init(&block_group->io_list);
WARN_ON(!IS_ERR(inode) && inode != block_group->io_ctl.inode);
spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
btrfs_wait_cache_io(trans, block_group, path);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
spin_lock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
}
if (!list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list)) {
list_del_init(&block_group->dirty_list);
remove_rsv = true;
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
mutex_unlock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
ret = btrfs_remove_free_space_inode(trans, inode, block_group);
if (ret)
btrfs: fix a block group ref counter leak after failure to remove block group When removing a block group, if we fail to delete the block group's item from the extent tree, we jump to the 'out' label and end up decrementing the block group's reference count once only (by 1), resulting in a counter leak because the block group at that point was already removed from the block group cache rbtree - so we have to decrement the reference count twice, once for the rbtree and once for our lookup at the start of the function. There is a second bug where if removing the free space tree entries (the call to remove_block_group_free_space()) fails we end up jumping to the 'out_put_group' label but end up decrementing the reference count only once, when we should have done it twice, since we have already removed the block group from the block group cache rbtree. This happens because the reference count decrement for the rbtree reference happens after attempting to remove the free space tree entries, which is far away from the place where we remove the block group from the rbtree. To make things less error prone, decrement the reference count for the rbtree immediately after removing the block group from it. This also eleminates the need for two different exit labels on error, renaming 'out_put_label' to just 'out' and removing the old 'out'. Fixes: f6033c5e333238 ("btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-06-01 18:12:06 +00:00
goto out;
spin_lock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
rb_erase(&block_group->cache_node,
&fs_info->block_group_cache_tree);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&block_group->cache_node);
btrfs: fix a block group ref counter leak after failure to remove block group When removing a block group, if we fail to delete the block group's item from the extent tree, we jump to the 'out' label and end up decrementing the block group's reference count once only (by 1), resulting in a counter leak because the block group at that point was already removed from the block group cache rbtree - so we have to decrement the reference count twice, once for the rbtree and once for our lookup at the start of the function. There is a second bug where if removing the free space tree entries (the call to remove_block_group_free_space()) fails we end up jumping to the 'out_put_group' label but end up decrementing the reference count only once, when we should have done it twice, since we have already removed the block group from the block group cache rbtree. This happens because the reference count decrement for the rbtree reference happens after attempting to remove the free space tree entries, which is far away from the place where we remove the block group from the rbtree. To make things less error prone, decrement the reference count for the rbtree immediately after removing the block group from it. This also eleminates the need for two different exit labels on error, renaming 'out_put_label' to just 'out' and removing the old 'out'. Fixes: f6033c5e333238 ("btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-06-01 18:12:06 +00:00
/* Once for the block groups rbtree */
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
if (fs_info->first_logical_byte == block_group->start)
fs_info->first_logical_byte = (u64)-1;
spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
down_write(&block_group->space_info->groups_sem);
/*
* we must use list_del_init so people can check to see if they
* are still on the list after taking the semaphore
*/
list_del_init(&block_group->list);
if (list_empty(&block_group->space_info->block_groups[index])) {
kobj = block_group->space_info->block_group_kobjs[index];
block_group->space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] = NULL;
clear_avail_alloc_bits(fs_info, block_group->flags);
}
up_write(&block_group->space_info->groups_sem);
clear_incompat_bg_bits(fs_info, block_group->flags);
if (kobj) {
kobject_del(kobj);
kobject_put(kobj);
}
if (block_group->has_caching_ctl)
caching_ctl = btrfs_get_caching_control(block_group);
if (block_group->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED)
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done(block_group);
if (block_group->has_caching_ctl) {
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_lock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
if (!caching_ctl) {
struct btrfs_caching_control *ctl;
list_for_each_entry(ctl,
&fs_info->caching_block_groups, list)
if (ctl->block_group == block_group) {
caching_ctl = ctl;
refcount_inc(&caching_ctl->count);
break;
}
}
if (caching_ctl)
list_del_init(&caching_ctl->list);
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_unlock(&fs_info->block_group_cache_lock);
if (caching_ctl) {
/* Once for the caching bgs list and once for us. */
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
}
}
spin_lock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list));
WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->io_list));
spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(block_group);
spin_lock(&block_group->space_info->lock);
list_del_init(&block_group->ro_list);
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, ENOSPC_DEBUG)) {
WARN_ON(block_group->space_info->total_bytes
< block_group->length);
WARN_ON(block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly
< block_group->length - block_group->zone_unusable);
WARN_ON(block_group->space_info->bytes_zone_unusable
< block_group->zone_unusable);
WARN_ON(block_group->space_info->disk_total
< block_group->length * factor);
}
block_group->space_info->total_bytes -= block_group->length;
block_group->space_info->bytes_readonly -=
(block_group->length - block_group->zone_unusable);
block_group->space_info->bytes_zone_unusable -=
block_group->zone_unusable;
block_group->space_info->disk_total -= block_group->length * factor;
spin_unlock(&block_group->space_info->lock);
btrfs: fix race between block group removal and block group creation There is a race between block group removal and block group creation when the removal is completed by a task running fitrim or scrub. When this happens we end up failing the block group creation with an error -EEXIST since we attempt to insert a duplicate block group item key in the extent tree. That results in a transaction abort. The race happens like this: 1) Task A is doing a fitrim, and at btrfs_trim_block_group() it freezes block group X with btrfs_freeze_block_group() (until very recently that was named btrfs_get_block_group_trimming()); 2) Task B starts removing block group X, either because it's now unused or due to relocation for example. So at btrfs_remove_block_group(), while holding the chunk mutex and the block group's lock, it sets the 'removed' flag of the block group and it sets the local variable 'remove_em' to false, because the block group is currently frozen (its 'frozen' counter is > 0, until very recently this counter was named 'trimming'); 3) Task B unlocks the block group and the chunk mutex; 4) Task A is done trimming the block group and unfreezes the block group by calling btrfs_unfreeze_block_group() (until very recently this was named btrfs_put_block_group_trimming()). In this function we lock the block group and set the local variable 'cleanup' to true because we were able to decrement the block group's 'frozen' counter down to 0 and the flag 'removed' is set in the block group. Since 'cleanup' is set to true, it locks the chunk mutex and removes the extent mapping representing the block group from the mapping tree; 5) Task C allocates a new block group Y and it picks up the logical address that block group X had as the logical address for Y, because X was the block group with the highest logical address and now the second block group with the highest logical address, the last in the fs mapping tree, ends at an offset corresponding to block group X's logical address (this logical address selection is done at volumes.c:find_next_chunk()). At this point the new block group Y does not have yet its item added to the extent tree (nor the corresponding device extent items and chunk item in the device and chunk trees). The new group Y is added to the list of pending block groups in the transaction handle; 6) Before task B proceeds to removing the block group item for block group X from the extent tree, which has a key matching: (X logical offset, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY, length) task C while ending its transaction handle calls btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), which finds block group Y and tries to insert the block group item for Y into the exten tree, which fails with -EEXIST since logical offset is the same that X had and task B hasn't yet deleted the key from the extent tree. This failure results in a transaction abort, producing a stack like the following: ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -17) WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 19736 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:2074 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor raid6_pq (...) CPU: 2 PID: 19736 Comm: fsstress Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-58 #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x1eb/0x260 [btrfs] Code: ff ff ff 48 8b 55 50 f0 48 (...) RSP: 0018:ffffa4160a1c7d58 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff961581909d98 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffb3d63990 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff9614f3356a58 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffff9615b65b0040 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff961581909c10 R13: ffff9615b0c32000 R14: ffff9614f3356ab0 R15: ffff9614be779000 FS: 00007f2ce2841e80(0000) GS:ffff9615bae00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000555f18780000 CR3: 0000000131d34005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups+0x398/0x4e0 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xd0/0xc50 [btrfs] ? btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier+0x1e/0x50 [btrfs] ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 iterate_supers+0xdb/0x180 ksys_sync+0x60/0xb0 __ia32_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7f2ce1d4d5b7 Code: 83 c4 08 48 3d 01 (...) RSP: 002b:00007ffd8b558c58 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a2 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000002c RCX: 00007f2ce1d4d5b7 RDX: 00000000ffffffff RSI: 00000000186ba07b RDI: 000000000000002c RBP: 0000555f17b9e520 R08: 0000000000000012 R09: 000000000000ce00 R10: 0000000000000078 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000032 R13: 0000000051eb851f R14: 00007ffd8b558cd0 R15: 0000555f1798ec20 irq event stamp: 0 hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb2abdedf>] copy_process+0x74f/0x2020 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ---[ end trace bd7c03622e0b0a9c ]--- Fix this simply by making btrfs_remove_block_group() remove the block group's item from the extent tree before it flags the block group as removed. Also make the free space deletion from the free space tree before flagging the block group as removed, to avoid a similar race with adding and removing free space entries for the free space tree. Fixes: 04216820fe83d5 ("Btrfs: fix race between fs trimming and block group remove/allocation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-06-01 18:12:19 +00:00
/*
* Remove the free space for the block group from the free space tree
* and the block group's item from the extent tree before marking the
* block group as removed. This is to prevent races with tasks that
* freeze and unfreeze a block group, this task and another task
* allocating a new block group - the unfreeze task ends up removing
* the block group's extent map before the task calling this function
* deletes the block group item from the extent tree, allowing for
* another task to attempt to create another block group with the same
* item key (and failing with -EEXIST and a transaction abort).
*/
ret = remove_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group);
if (ret)
goto out;
ret = remove_block_group_item(trans, path, block_group);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
block_group->removed = 1;
/*
* At this point trimming or scrub can't start on this block group,
* because we removed the block group from the rbtree
* fs_info->block_group_cache_tree so no one can't find it anymore and
* even if someone already got this block group before we removed it
* from the rbtree, they have already incremented block_group->frozen -
* if they didn't, for the trimming case they won't find any free space
* entries because we already removed them all when we called
* btrfs_remove_free_space_cache().
*
* And we must not remove the extent map from the fs_info->mapping_tree
* to prevent the same logical address range and physical device space
* ranges from being reused for a new block group. This is needed to
* avoid races with trimming and scrub.
*
* An fs trim operation (btrfs_trim_fs() / btrfs_ioctl_fitrim()) is
* completely transactionless, so while it is trimming a range the
* currently running transaction might finish and a new one start,
* allowing for new block groups to be created that can reuse the same
* physical device locations unless we take this special care.
*
* There may also be an implicit trim operation if the file system
* is mounted with -odiscard. The same protections must remain
* in place until the extents have been discarded completely when
* the transaction commit has completed.
*/
remove_em = (atomic_read(&block_group->frozen) == 0);
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
if (remove_em) {
struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
write_lock(&em_tree->lock);
remove_extent_mapping(em_tree, em);
write_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
/* once for the tree */
free_extent_map(em);
}
btrfs: fix a block group ref counter leak after failure to remove block group When removing a block group, if we fail to delete the block group's item from the extent tree, we jump to the 'out' label and end up decrementing the block group's reference count once only (by 1), resulting in a counter leak because the block group at that point was already removed from the block group cache rbtree - so we have to decrement the reference count twice, once for the rbtree and once for our lookup at the start of the function. There is a second bug where if removing the free space tree entries (the call to remove_block_group_free_space()) fails we end up jumping to the 'out_put_group' label but end up decrementing the reference count only once, when we should have done it twice, since we have already removed the block group from the block group cache rbtree. This happens because the reference count decrement for the rbtree reference happens after attempting to remove the free space tree entries, which is far away from the place where we remove the block group from the rbtree. To make things less error prone, decrement the reference count for the rbtree immediately after removing the block group from it. This also eleminates the need for two different exit labels on error, renaming 'out_put_label' to just 'out' and removing the old 'out'. Fixes: f6033c5e333238 ("btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-06-01 18:12:06 +00:00
out:
/* Once for the lookup reference */
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
if (remove_rsv)
btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
struct btrfs_trans_handle *btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group(
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const u64 chunk_offset)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
struct extent_map *em;
struct map_lookup *map;
unsigned int num_items;
read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, chunk_offset, 1);
read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
ASSERT(em && em->start == chunk_offset);
/*
* We need to reserve 3 + N units from the metadata space info in order
* to remove a block group (done at btrfs_remove_chunk() and at
* btrfs_remove_block_group()), which are used for:
*
* 1 unit for adding the free space inode's orphan (located in the tree
* of tree roots).
* 1 unit for deleting the block group item (located in the extent
* tree).
* 1 unit for deleting the free space item (located in tree of tree
* roots).
* N units for deleting N device extent items corresponding to each
* stripe (located in the device tree).
*
* In order to remove a block group we also need to reserve units in the
* system space info in order to update the chunk tree (update one or
* more device items and remove one chunk item), but this is done at
* btrfs_remove_chunk() through a call to check_system_chunk().
*/
map = em->map_lookup;
num_items = 3 + map->num_stripes;
free_extent_map(em);
return btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv(root, num_items);
}
/*
* Mark block group @cache read-only, so later write won't happen to block
* group @cache.
*
* If @force is not set, this function will only mark the block group readonly
* if we have enough free space (1M) in other metadata/system block groups.
* If @force is not set, this function will mark the block group readonly
* without checking free space.
*
* NOTE: This function doesn't care if other block groups can contain all the
* data in this block group. That check should be done by relocation routine,
* not this function.
*/
static int inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group *cache, int force)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
u64 num_bytes;
int ret = -ENOSPC;
spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrub When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-05 12:55:37 +00:00
if (cache->swap_extents) {
ret = -ETXTBSY;
goto out;
}
if (cache->ro) {
cache->ro++;
ret = 0;
goto out;
}
num_bytes = cache->length - cache->reserved - cache->pinned -
cache->bytes_super - cache->zone_unusable - cache->used;
/*
* Data never overcommits, even in mixed mode, so do just the straight
* check of left over space in how much we have allocated.
*/
if (force) {
ret = 0;
} else if (sinfo->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) {
u64 sinfo_used = btrfs_space_info_used(sinfo, true);
/*
* Here we make sure if we mark this bg RO, we still have enough
* free space as buffer.
*/
if (sinfo_used + num_bytes <= sinfo->total_bytes)
ret = 0;
} else {
/*
* We overcommit metadata, so we need to do the
* btrfs_can_overcommit check here, and we need to pass in
* BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH to give ourselves the most amount of
* leeway to allow us to mark this block group as read only.
*/
if (btrfs_can_overcommit(cache->fs_info, sinfo, num_bytes,
BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH))
ret = 0;
}
if (!ret) {
sinfo->bytes_readonly += num_bytes;
if (btrfs_is_zoned(cache->fs_info)) {
/* Migrate zone_unusable bytes to readonly */
sinfo->bytes_readonly += cache->zone_unusable;
sinfo->bytes_zone_unusable -= cache->zone_unusable;
cache->zone_unusable = 0;
}
cache->ro++;
list_add_tail(&cache->ro_list, &sinfo->ro_bgs);
}
out:
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&sinfo->lock);
if (ret == -ENOSPC && btrfs_test_opt(cache->fs_info, ENOSPC_DEBUG)) {
btrfs_info(cache->fs_info,
"unable to make block group %llu ro", cache->start);
btrfs_dump_space_info(cache->fs_info, cache->space_info, 0, 0);
}
return ret;
}
static bool clean_pinned_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
struct btrfs_transaction *prev_trans = NULL;
const u64 start = bg->start;
const u64 end = start + bg->length - 1;
int ret;
spin_lock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
if (trans->transaction->list.prev != &fs_info->trans_list) {
prev_trans = list_last_entry(&trans->transaction->list,
struct btrfs_transaction, list);
refcount_inc(&prev_trans->use_count);
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
/*
* Hold the unused_bg_unpin_mutex lock to avoid racing with
* btrfs_finish_extent_commit(). If we are at transaction N, another
* task might be running finish_extent_commit() for the previous
* transaction N - 1, and have seen a range belonging to the block
* group in pinned_extents before we were able to clear the whole block
* group range from pinned_extents. This means that task can lookup for
* the block group after we unpinned it from pinned_extents and removed
* it, leading to a BUG_ON() at unpin_extent_range().
*/
mutex_lock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex);
if (prev_trans) {
ret = clear_extent_bits(&prev_trans->pinned_extents, start, end,
EXTENT_DIRTY);
if (ret)
goto out;
}
ret = clear_extent_bits(&trans->transaction->pinned_extents, start, end,
EXTENT_DIRTY);
out:
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bg_unpin_mutex);
if (prev_trans)
btrfs_put_transaction(prev_trans);
return ret == 0;
}
/*
* Process the unused_bgs list and remove any that don't have any allocated
* space inside of them.
*/
void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
const bool async_trim_enabled = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DISCARD_ASYNC);
int ret = 0;
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
return;
/*
* Long running balances can keep us blocked here for eternity, so
* simply skip deletion if we're unable to get the mutex.
*/
if (!mutex_trylock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock))
return;
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
while (!list_empty(&fs_info->unused_bgs)) {
int trimming;
block_group = list_first_entry(&fs_info->unused_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
bg_list);
list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
space_info = block_group->space_info;
if (ret || btrfs_mixed_space_info(space_info)) {
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
continue;
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
btrfs_discard_cancel_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl, block_group);
/* Don't want to race with allocators so take the groups_sem */
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
/*
* Async discard moves the final block group discard to be prior
* to the unused_bgs code path. Therefore, if it's not fully
* trimmed, punt it back to the async discard lists.
*/
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DISCARD_ASYNC) &&
!btrfs_is_free_space_trimmed(block_group)) {
trace_btrfs_skip_unused_block_group(block_group);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
/* Requeue if we failed because of async discard */
btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl,
block_group);
goto next;
}
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
if (block_group->reserved || block_group->pinned ||
block_group->used || block_group->ro ||
list_is_singular(&block_group->list)) {
/*
* We want to bail if we made new allocations or have
* outstanding allocations in this block group. We do
* the ro check in case balance is currently acting on
* this block group.
*/
trace_btrfs_skip_unused_block_group(block_group);
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
goto next;
}
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
/* We don't want to force the issue, only flip if it's ok. */
ret = inc_block_group_ro(block_group, 0);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
if (ret < 0) {
ret = 0;
goto next;
}
/*
* Want to do this before we do anything else so we can recover
* properly if we fail to join the transaction.
*/
trans = btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group(fs_info,
block_group->start);
if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(block_group);
ret = PTR_ERR(trans);
goto next;
}
/*
* We could have pending pinned extents for this block group,
* just delete them, we don't care about them anymore.
*/
if (!clean_pinned_extents(trans, block_group)) {
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(block_group);
goto end_trans;
}
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
/*
* At this point, the block_group is read only and should fail
* new allocations. However, btrfs_finish_extent_commit() can
* cause this block_group to be placed back on the discard
* lists because now the block_group isn't fully discarded.
* Bail here and try again later after discarding everything.
*/
spin_lock(&fs_info->discard_ctl.lock);
if (!list_empty(&block_group->discard_list)) {
spin_unlock(&fs_info->discard_ctl.lock);
btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(block_group);
btrfs_discard_queue_work(&fs_info->discard_ctl,
block_group);
goto end_trans;
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->discard_ctl.lock);
/* Reset pinned so btrfs_put_block_group doesn't complain */
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_pinned(fs_info, space_info,
-block_group->pinned);
space_info->bytes_readonly += block_group->pinned;
block_group->pinned = 0;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
/*
* The normal path here is an unused block group is passed here,
* then trimming is handled in the transaction commit path.
* Async discard interposes before this to do the trimming
* before coming down the unused block group path as trimming
* will no longer be done later in the transaction commit path.
*/
if (!async_trim_enabled && btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DISCARD_ASYNC))
goto flip_async;
/*
* DISCARD can flip during remount. On zoned filesystems, we
* need to reset sequential-required zones.
*/
trimming = btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, DISCARD_SYNC) ||
btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info);
/* Implicit trim during transaction commit. */
if (trimming)
btrfs_freeze_block_group(block_group);
/*
* Btrfs_remove_chunk will abort the transaction if things go
* horribly wrong.
*/
ret = btrfs_remove_chunk(trans, block_group->start);
if (ret) {
if (trimming)
btrfs_unfreeze_block_group(block_group);
goto end_trans;
}
/*
* If we're not mounted with -odiscard, we can just forget
* about this block group. Otherwise we'll need to wait
* until transaction commit to do the actual discard.
*/
if (trimming) {
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
/*
* A concurrent scrub might have added us to the list
* fs_info->unused_bgs, so use a list_move operation
* to add the block group to the deleted_bgs list.
*/
list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
}
end_trans:
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
next:
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
return;
flip_async:
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
btrfs_discard_punt_unused_bgs_list(fs_info);
}
void btrfs_mark_bg_unused(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) {
btrfs_get_block_group(bg);
trace_btrfs_add_unused_block_group(bg);
list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->unused_bgs);
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
}
/*
* We want block groups with a low number of used bytes to be in the beginning
* of the list, so they will get reclaimed first.
*/
static int reclaim_bgs_cmp(void *unused, const struct list_head *a,
const struct list_head *b)
{
const struct btrfs_block_group *bg1, *bg2;
bg1 = list_entry(a, struct btrfs_block_group, bg_list);
bg2 = list_entry(b, struct btrfs_block_group, bg_list);
return bg1->used > bg2->used;
}
void btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info =
container_of(work, struct btrfs_fs_info, reclaim_bgs_work);
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded while send is about to do something with the extents. This was explained in commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device). We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13c183 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones"). So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening. This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support". Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 10:10:38 +00:00
LIST_HEAD(again_list);
if (!test_bit(BTRFS_FS_OPEN, &fs_info->flags))
return;
if (!btrfs_exclop_start(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE))
return;
/*
* Long running balances can keep us blocked here for eternity, so
* simply skip reclaim if we're unable to get the mutex.
*/
if (!mutex_trylock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock)) {
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
return;
}
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
/*
* Sort happens under lock because we can't simply splice it and sort.
* The block groups might still be in use and reachable via bg_list,
* and their presence in the reclaim_bgs list must be preserved.
*/
list_sort(NULL, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs, reclaim_bgs_cmp);
while (!list_empty(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs)) {
u64 zone_unusable;
btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded while send is about to do something with the extents. This was explained in commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device). We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13c183 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones"). So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening. This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support". Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 10:10:38 +00:00
int ret = 0;
bg = list_first_entry(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
bg_list);
list_del_init(&bg->bg_list);
space_info = bg->space_info;
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
/* Don't race with allocators so take the groups_sem */
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
spin_lock(&bg->lock);
if (bg->reserved || bg->pinned || bg->ro) {
/*
* We want to bail if we made new allocations or have
* outstanding allocations in this block group. We do
* the ro check in case balance is currently acting on
* this block group.
*/
spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
goto next;
}
spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
/* Get out fast, in case we're unmounting the filesystem */
if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) {
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
goto next;
}
/*
* Cache the zone_unusable value before turning the block group
* to read only. As soon as the blog group is read only it's
* zone_unusable value gets moved to the block group's read-only
* bytes and isn't available for calculations anymore.
*/
zone_unusable = bg->zone_unusable;
ret = inc_block_group_ro(bg, 0);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
if (ret < 0)
goto next;
btrfs_info(fs_info,
"reclaiming chunk %llu with %llu%% used %llu%% unusable",
bg->start, div_u64(bg->used * 100, bg->length),
div64_u64(zone_unusable * 100, bg->length));
trace_btrfs_reclaim_block_group(bg);
ret = btrfs_relocate_chunk(fs_info, bg->start);
if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
btrfs_err(fs_info, "error relocating chunk %llu",
bg->start);
next:
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded while send is about to do something with the extents. This was explained in commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device). We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13c183 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones"). So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening. This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support". Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 10:10:38 +00:00
if (ret == -EAGAIN && list_empty(&bg->bg_list))
list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &again_list);
else
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
}
btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations running Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded while send is about to do something with the extents. This was explained in commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device). We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13c183 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones"). So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening. This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support". Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21 10:10:38 +00:00
list_splice_tail(&again_list, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock);
btrfs_exclop_finish(fs_info);
}
void btrfs_reclaim_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
if (!list_empty(&fs_info->reclaim_bgs))
queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs_work);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
}
void btrfs_mark_bg_to_reclaim(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = bg->fs_info;
spin_lock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
if (list_empty(&bg->bg_list)) {
btrfs_get_block_group(bg);
trace_btrfs_add_reclaim_block_group(bg);
list_add_tail(&bg->bg_list, &fs_info->reclaim_bgs);
}
spin_unlock(&fs_info->unused_bgs_lock);
}
static int read_bg_from_eb(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct btrfs_key *key,
struct btrfs_path *path)
{
struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
struct extent_map *em;
struct btrfs_block_group_item bg;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int slot;
u64 flags;
int ret = 0;
slot = path->slots[0];
leaf = path->nodes[0];
em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
read_lock(&em_tree->lock);
em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, key->objectid, key->offset);
read_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
if (!em) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"logical %llu len %llu found bg but no related chunk",
key->objectid, key->offset);
return -ENOENT;
}
if (em->start != key->objectid || em->len != key->offset) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"block group %llu len %llu mismatch with chunk %llu len %llu",
key->objectid, key->offset, em->start, em->len);
ret = -EUCLEAN;
goto out_free_em;
}
read_extent_buffer(leaf, &bg, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
sizeof(bg));
flags = btrfs_stack_block_group_flags(&bg) &
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK;
if (flags != (em->map_lookup->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"block group %llu len %llu type flags 0x%llx mismatch with chunk type flags 0x%llx",
key->objectid, key->offset, flags,
(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK & em->map_lookup->type));
ret = -EUCLEAN;
}
out_free_em:
free_extent_map(em);
return ret;
}
static int find_first_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_key *key)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
int ret;
struct btrfs_key found_key;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int slot;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, root, key, path, 0, 0);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
while (1) {
slot = path->slots[0];
leaf = path->nodes[0];
if (slot >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(root, path);
if (ret == 0)
continue;
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
break;
}
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &found_key, slot);
if (found_key.objectid >= key->objectid &&
found_key.type == BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY) {
ret = read_bg_from_eb(fs_info, &found_key, path);
break;
}
path->slots[0]++;
}
out:
return ret;
}
static void set_avail_alloc_bits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 flags)
{
u64 extra_flags = chunk_to_extended(flags) &
BTRFS_EXTENDED_PROFILE_MASK;
write_seqlock(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)
fs_info->avail_data_alloc_bits |= extra_flags;
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
fs_info->avail_metadata_alloc_bits |= extra_flags;
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
fs_info->avail_system_alloc_bits |= extra_flags;
write_sequnlock(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
}
/**
* Map a physical disk address to a list of logical addresses
*
* @fs_info: the filesystem
* @chunk_start: logical address of block group
* @bdev: physical device to resolve, can be NULL to indicate any device
* @physical: physical address to map to logical addresses
* @logical: return array of logical addresses which map to @physical
* @naddrs: length of @logical
* @stripe_len: size of IO stripe for the given block group
*
* Maps a particular @physical disk address to a list of @logical addresses.
* Used primarily to exclude those portions of a block group that contain super
* block copies.
*/
int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_start,
struct block_device *bdev, u64 physical, u64 **logical,
int *naddrs, int *stripe_len)
{
struct extent_map *em;
struct map_lookup *map;
u64 *buf;
u64 bytenr;
u64 data_stripe_length;
u64 io_stripe_size;
int i, nr = 0;
int ret = 0;
em = btrfs_get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_start, 1);
if (IS_ERR(em))
return -EIO;
map = em->map_lookup;
data_stripe_length = em->orig_block_len;
io_stripe_size = map->stripe_len;
chunk_start = em->start;
/* For RAID5/6 adjust to a full IO stripe length */
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK)
io_stripe_size = map->stripe_len * nr_data_stripes(map);
buf = kcalloc(map->num_stripes, sizeof(u64), GFP_NOFS);
if (!buf) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
bool already_inserted = false;
u64 stripe_nr;
u64 offset;
int j;
if (!in_range(physical, map->stripes[i].physical,
data_stripe_length))
continue;
if (bdev && map->stripes[i].dev->bdev != bdev)
continue;
stripe_nr = physical - map->stripes[i].physical;
stripe_nr = div64_u64_rem(stripe_nr, map->stripe_len, &offset);
if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10) {
stripe_nr = stripe_nr * map->num_stripes + i;
stripe_nr = div_u64(stripe_nr, map->sub_stripes);
} else if (map->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0) {
stripe_nr = stripe_nr * map->num_stripes + i;
}
/*
* The remaining case would be for RAID56, multiply by
* nr_data_stripes(). Alternatively, just use rmap_len below
* instead of map->stripe_len
*/
bytenr = chunk_start + stripe_nr * io_stripe_size + offset;
/* Ensure we don't add duplicate addresses */
for (j = 0; j < nr; j++) {
if (buf[j] == bytenr) {
already_inserted = true;
break;
}
}
if (!already_inserted)
buf[nr++] = bytenr;
}
*logical = buf;
*naddrs = nr;
*stripe_len = io_stripe_size;
out:
free_extent_map(em);
return ret;
}
static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = cache->fs_info;
btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode Superblock (and its copies) is the only data structure in btrfs which has a fixed location on a device. Since we cannot overwrite in a sequential write required zone, we cannot place superblock in the zone. One easy solution is limiting superblock and copies to be placed only in conventional zones. However, this method has two downsides: one is reduced number of superblock copies. The location of the second copy of superblock is 256GB, which is in a sequential write required zone on typical devices in the market today. So, the number of superblock and copies is limited to be two. Second downside is that we cannot support devices which have no conventional zones at all. To solve these two problems, we employ superblock log writing. It uses two adjacent zones as a circular buffer to write updated superblocks. Once the first zone is filled up, start writing into the second one. Then, when both zones are filled up and before starting to write to the first zone again, it reset the first zone. We can determine the position of the latest superblock by reading write pointer information from a device. One corner case is when both zones are full. For this situation, we read out the last superblock of each zone, and compare them to determine which zone is older. The following zones are reserved as the circular buffer on ZONED btrfs. - The primary superblock: zones 0 and 1 - The first copy: zones 16 and 17 - The second copy: zones 1024 or zone at 256GB which is minimum, and next to it If these reserved zones are conventional, superblock is written fixed at the start of the zone without logging. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-11-10 11:26:14 +00:00
const bool zoned = btrfs_is_zoned(fs_info);
u64 bytenr;
u64 *logical;
int stripe_len;
int i, nr, ret;
if (cache->start < BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET) {
stripe_len = BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET - cache->start;
cache->bytes_super += stripe_len;
ret = btrfs_add_excluded_extent(fs_info, cache->start,
stripe_len);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
ret = btrfs_rmap_block(fs_info, cache->start, NULL,
bytenr, &logical, &nr, &stripe_len);
if (ret)
return ret;
btrfs: implement log-structured superblock for ZONED mode Superblock (and its copies) is the only data structure in btrfs which has a fixed location on a device. Since we cannot overwrite in a sequential write required zone, we cannot place superblock in the zone. One easy solution is limiting superblock and copies to be placed only in conventional zones. However, this method has two downsides: one is reduced number of superblock copies. The location of the second copy of superblock is 256GB, which is in a sequential write required zone on typical devices in the market today. So, the number of superblock and copies is limited to be two. Second downside is that we cannot support devices which have no conventional zones at all. To solve these two problems, we employ superblock log writing. It uses two adjacent zones as a circular buffer to write updated superblocks. Once the first zone is filled up, start writing into the second one. Then, when both zones are filled up and before starting to write to the first zone again, it reset the first zone. We can determine the position of the latest superblock by reading write pointer information from a device. One corner case is when both zones are full. For this situation, we read out the last superblock of each zone, and compare them to determine which zone is older. The following zones are reserved as the circular buffer on ZONED btrfs. - The primary superblock: zones 0 and 1 - The first copy: zones 16 and 17 - The second copy: zones 1024 or zone at 256GB which is minimum, and next to it If these reserved zones are conventional, superblock is written fixed at the start of the zone without logging. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-11-10 11:26:14 +00:00
/* Shouldn't have super stripes in sequential zones */
if (zoned && nr) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"zoned: block group %llu must not contain super block",
cache->start);
return -EUCLEAN;
}
while (nr--) {
u64 len = min_t(u64, stripe_len,
cache->start + cache->length - logical[nr]);
cache->bytes_super += len;
ret = btrfs_add_excluded_extent(fs_info, logical[nr],
len);
if (ret) {
kfree(logical);
return ret;
}
}
kfree(logical);
}
return 0;
}
static void link_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
int index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(cache->flags);
down_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
list_add_tail(&cache->list, &space_info->block_groups[index]);
up_write(&space_info->groups_sem);
}
static struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_create_block_group_cache(
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 start)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_NOFS);
if (!cache)
return NULL;
cache->free_space_ctl = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache->free_space_ctl),
GFP_NOFS);
if (!cache->free_space_ctl) {
kfree(cache);
return NULL;
}
cache->start = start;
cache->fs_info = fs_info;
cache->full_stripe_len = btrfs_full_stripe_len(fs_info, start);
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
cache->discard_index = BTRFS_DISCARD_INDEX_UNUSED;
refcount_set(&cache->refs, 1);
spin_lock_init(&cache->lock);
init_rwsem(&cache->data_rwsem);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->cluster_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->bg_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->ro_list);
btrfs: add the beginning of async discard, discard workqueue When discard is enabled, everytime a pinned extent is released back to the block_group's free space cache, a discard is issued for the extent. This is an overeager approach when it comes to discarding and helping the SSD maintain enough free space to prevent severe garbage collection situations. This adds the beginning of async discard. Instead of issuing a discard prior to returning it to the free space, it is just marked as untrimmed. The block_group is then added to a LRU which then feeds into a workqueue to issue discards at a much slower rate. Full discarding of unused block groups is still done and will be addressed in a future patch of the series. For now, we don't persist the discard state of extents and bitmaps. Therefore, our failure recovery mode will be to consider extents untrimmed. This lets us handle failure and unmounting as one in the same. On a number of Facebook webservers, I collected data every minute accounting the time we spent in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() (col. 1) and in btrfs_commit_transaction() (col. 2). btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is where we discard extents synchronously before returning them to the free space cache. discard=sync: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) --------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 434 | 1170 Drive B | 880 | 2330 Drive C | 2943 | 3920 Drive D | 4763 | 5701 discard=async: p99 total per minute p99 total per minute Drive | extent_commit() (ms) | commit_trans() (ms) -------------------------------------------------------------- Drive A | 134 | 956 Drive B | 64 | 1972 Drive C | 59 | 1032 Drive D | 62 | 1200 While it's not great that the stats are cumulative over 1m, all of these servers are running the same workload and and the delta between the two are substantial. We are spending significantly less time in btrfs_finish_extent_commit() which is responsible for discarding. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:14 +00:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->discard_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->dirty_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->io_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->active_bg_list);
btrfs_init_free_space_ctl(cache, cache->free_space_ctl);
atomic_set(&cache->frozen, 0);
mutex_init(&cache->free_space_lock);
btrfs_init_full_stripe_locks_tree(&cache->full_stripe_locks_root);
return cache;
}
/*
* Iterate all chunks and verify that each of them has the corresponding block
* group
*/
static int check_chunk_block_group_mappings(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
struct extent_map_tree *map_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
struct extent_map *em;
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
u64 start = 0;
int ret = 0;
while (1) {
read_lock(&map_tree->lock);
/*
* lookup_extent_mapping will return the first extent map
* intersecting the range, so setting @len to 1 is enough to
* get the first chunk.
*/
em = lookup_extent_mapping(map_tree, start, 1);
read_unlock(&map_tree->lock);
if (!em)
break;
bg = btrfs_lookup_block_group(fs_info, em->start);
if (!bg) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"chunk start=%llu len=%llu doesn't have corresponding block group",
em->start, em->len);
ret = -EUCLEAN;
free_extent_map(em);
break;
}
if (bg->start != em->start || bg->length != em->len ||
(bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) !=
(em->map_lookup->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK)) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
"chunk start=%llu len=%llu flags=0x%llx doesn't match block group start=%llu len=%llu flags=0x%llx",
em->start, em->len,
em->map_lookup->type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK,
bg->start, bg->length,
bg->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK);
ret = -EUCLEAN;
free_extent_map(em);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
break;
}
start = em->start + em->len;
free_extent_map(em);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
}
return ret;
}
static int read_one_block_group(struct btrfs_fs_info *info,
struct btrfs_block_group_item *bgi,
const struct btrfs_key *key,
int need_clear)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
const bool mixed = btrfs_fs_incompat(info, MIXED_GROUPS);
int ret;
ASSERT(key->type == BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY);
cache = btrfs_create_block_group_cache(info, key->objectid);
if (!cache)
return -ENOMEM;
cache->length = key->offset;
cache->used = btrfs_stack_block_group_used(bgi);
cache->flags = btrfs_stack_block_group_flags(bgi);
set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
if (need_clear) {
/*
* When we mount with old space cache, we need to
* set BTRFS_DC_CLEAR and set dirty flag.
*
* a) Setting 'BTRFS_DC_CLEAR' makes sure that we
* truncate the old free space cache inode and
* setup a new one.
* b) Setting 'dirty flag' makes sure that we flush
* the new space cache info onto disk.
*/
if (btrfs_test_opt(info, SPACE_CACHE))
cache->disk_cache_state = BTRFS_DC_CLEAR;
}
if (!mixed && ((cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) &&
(cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
btrfs_err(info,
"bg %llu is a mixed block group but filesystem hasn't enabled mixed block groups",
cache->start);
ret = -EINVAL;
goto error;
}
ret = btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info(cache, false);
if (ret) {
btrfs_err(info, "zoned: failed to load zone info of bg %llu",
cache->start);
goto error;
}
/*
* We need to exclude the super stripes now so that the space info has
* super bytes accounted for, otherwise we'll think we have more space
* than we actually do.
*/
ret = exclude_super_stripes(cache);
if (ret) {
/* We may have excluded something, so call this just in case. */
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
goto error;
}
/*
* For zoned filesystem, space after the allocation offset is the only
* free space for a block group. So, we don't need any caching work.
* btrfs_calc_zone_unusable() will set the amount of free space and
* zone_unusable space.
*
* For regular filesystem, check for two cases, either we are full, and
* therefore don't need to bother with the caching work since we won't
* find any space, or we are empty, and we can just add all the space
* in and be done with it. This saves us _a_lot_ of time, particularly
* in the full case.
*/
if (btrfs_is_zoned(info)) {
btrfs_calc_zone_unusable(cache);
/* Should not have any excluded extents. Just in case, though. */
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
} else if (cache->length == cache->used) {
cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
} else if (cache->used == 0) {
cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
add_new_free_space(cache, cache->start,
cache->start + cache->length);
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
}
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(info, cache);
if (ret) {
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
goto error;
}
trace_btrfs_add_block_group(info, cache, 0);
btrfs_update_space_info(info, cache->flags, cache->length,
cache->used, cache->bytes_super,
cache->zone_unusable, &space_info);
cache->space_info = space_info;
link_block_group(cache);
set_avail_alloc_bits(info, cache->flags);
if (btrfs_chunk_writeable(info, cache->start)) {
if (cache->used == 0) {
ASSERT(list_empty(&cache->bg_list));
if (btrfs_test_opt(info, DISCARD_ASYNC))
btrfs_discard_queue_work(&info->discard_ctl, cache);
else
btrfs_mark_bg_unused(cache);
}
} else {
inc_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
return 0;
error:
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
return ret;
}
static int fill_dummy_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{
struct extent_map_tree *em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
struct rb_node *node;
int ret = 0;
for (node = rb_first_cached(&em_tree->map); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
struct extent_map *em;
struct map_lookup *map;
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
em = rb_entry(node, struct extent_map, rb_node);
map = em->map_lookup;
bg = btrfs_create_block_group_cache(fs_info, em->start);
if (!bg) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
/* Fill dummy cache as FULL */
bg->length = em->len;
bg->flags = map->type;
bg->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
bg->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
bg->used = em->len;
bg->flags = map->type;
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(fs_info, bg);
/*
* We may have some valid block group cache added already, in
* that case we skip to the next one.
*/
if (ret == -EEXIST) {
ret = 0;
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
continue;
}
if (ret) {
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(bg);
btrfs_put_block_group(bg);
break;
}
btrfs_update_space_info(fs_info, bg->flags, em->len, em->len,
0, 0, &space_info);
bg->space_info = space_info;
link_block_group(bg);
set_avail_alloc_bits(fs_info, bg->flags);
}
if (!ret)
btrfs_init_global_block_rsv(fs_info);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(info);
struct btrfs_path *path;
int ret;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
struct btrfs_key key;
int need_clear = 0;
u64 cache_gen;
if (!root)
return fill_dummy_bgs(info);
key.objectid = 0;
key.offset = 0;
key.type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
cache_gen = btrfs_super_cache_generation(info->super_copy);
if (btrfs_test_opt(info, SPACE_CACHE) &&
btrfs_super_generation(info->super_copy) != cache_gen)
need_clear = 1;
if (btrfs_test_opt(info, CLEAR_CACHE))
need_clear = 1;
while (1) {
struct btrfs_block_group_item bgi;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
int slot;
ret = find_first_block_group(info, path, &key);
if (ret > 0)
break;
if (ret != 0)
goto error;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
slot = path->slots[0];
read_extent_buffer(leaf, &bgi, btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, slot),
sizeof(bgi));
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, slot);
btrfs_release_path(path);
ret = read_one_block_group(info, &bgi, &key, need_clear);
if (ret < 0)
goto error;
key.objectid += key.offset;
key.offset = 0;
}
btrfs: drop the path before adding block group sysfs files Dave reported a problem with my rwsem conversion patch where we got the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/76 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9d5d25df2530 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 fs_reclaim_acquire.part.0+0x25/0x30 kmem_cache_alloc+0x30/0x9c0 alloc_inode+0x81/0x90 iget_locked+0xcd/0x1a0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x210 sysfs_get_tree+0x1a/0x50 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #3 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x58/0x80 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x70/0xd0 kobject_add_internal+0xbb/0x2d0 kobject_add+0x7a/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x141/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_read_block_groups+0x1f1/0x8c0 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x981/0x1108 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0xe/0xb0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 fc_mount+0xe/0x40 vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0x90 btrfs_mount+0x13b/0x3e0 [btrfs] legacy_get_tree+0x2d/0x60 vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xb0 path_mount+0x70f/0xa80 do_mount+0x75/0x90 __x64_sys_mount+0x8e/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (btrfs-extent-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] check_committed_ref+0x69/0x200 [btrfs] btrfs_cross_ref_exist+0x65/0xb0 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x446/0x9b0 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0x61/0x6a0 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0xae/0x160 [btrfs] __extent_writepage+0x262/0x420 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x2b6/0x510 [btrfs] extent_writepages+0x43/0x90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x40/0xe0 __writeback_single_inode+0x62/0x610 writeback_sb_inodes+0x20f/0x500 wb_writeback+0xef/0x4a0 wb_do_writeback+0x49/0x2e0 wb_workfn+0x81/0x340 process_one_work+0x233/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (btrfs-fs-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 down_read_nested+0x45/0x220 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x35/0x1c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_search_slot+0x6d4/0xfd0 [btrfs] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x3a/0xc0 [btrfs] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x93/0x2c0 [btrfs] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x7de/0x850 [btrfs] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x8e/0x140 [btrfs] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x367/0xbc0 [btrfs] btrfs_mksubvol+0x2db/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_mksnapshot+0x7b/0xb0 [btrfs] __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x16f/0x1a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xb0/0xf0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0xd0b/0x2690 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6f/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 kthread+0x137/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/76: #0: ffffffffa40cbba0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffffa40b8b58 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x54/0x2e0 #2: ffff9d5d322390e8 (&type->s_umount_key#26){++++}-{3:3}, at: trylock_super+0x16/0x50 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 76 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-default+ #1297 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x77/0x97 check_noncircular+0xff/0x110 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 check_prev_add+0x91/0xc60 validate_chain+0xa6e/0x2a20 ? save_trace+0x50/0x470 __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 lock_acquire+0xca/0x430 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __mutex_lock+0xa0/0xaf0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? __lock_acquire+0x582/0xac0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] ? btrfs_evict_inode+0x30b/0x560 [btrfs] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x320 [btrfs] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3cc/0x560 [btrfs] evict+0xd6/0x1c0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x54/0x80 super_cache_scan+0x121/0x1a0 do_shrink_slab+0x16d/0x3b0 shrink_slab+0xb1/0x2e0 shrink_node+0x230/0x6a0 balance_pgdat+0x325/0x750 kswapd+0x206/0x4d0 ? finish_wait+0x90/0x90 ? balance_pgdat+0x750/0x750 kthread+0x137/0x150 ? kthread_mod_delayed_work+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are still holding the path open when we start adding the sysfs files for the block groups, which creates a dependency on fs_reclaim via the tree lock. Fix this by dropping the path before we start doing anything with sysfs. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.8+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-14 21:00:51 +00:00
btrfs_release_path(path);
list_for_each_entry(space_info, &info->space_info, list) {
btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-09-01 21:40:38 +00:00
int i;
for (i = 0; i < BTRFS_NR_RAID_TYPES; i++) {
if (list_empty(&space_info->block_groups[i]))
continue;
cache = list_first_entry(&space_info->block_groups[i],
struct btrfs_block_group,
list);
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(cache);
}
if (!(btrfs_get_alloc_profile(info, space_info->flags) &
(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1_MASK |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID56_MASK |
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP)))
continue;
/*
* Avoid allocating from un-mirrored block group if there are
* mirrored block groups.
*/
list_for_each_entry(cache,
&space_info->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_RAID0],
list)
inc_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
list_for_each_entry(cache,
&space_info->block_groups[BTRFS_RAID_SINGLE],
list)
inc_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
btrfs_init_global_block_rsv(info);
ret = check_chunk_block_group_mappings(info);
error:
btrfs_free_path(path);
/*
* We've hit some error while reading the extent tree, and have
* rescue=ibadroots mount option.
* Try to fill the tree using dummy block groups so that the user can
* continue to mount and grab their data.
*/
if (ret && btrfs_test_opt(info, IGNOREBADROOTS))
ret = fill_dummy_bgs(info);
return ret;
}
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
/*
* This function, insert_block_group_item(), belongs to the phase 2 of chunk
* allocation.
*
* See the comment at btrfs_chunk_alloc() for details about the chunk allocation
* phases.
*/
static int insert_block_group_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group_item bgi;
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
struct btrfs_key key;
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_used(&bgi, block_group->used);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_chunk_objectid(&bgi,
BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_flags(&bgi, block_group->flags);
key.objectid = block_group->start;
key.type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = block_group->length;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
return btrfs_insert_item(trans, root, &key, &bgi, sizeof(bgi));
}
static int insert_dev_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_device *device, u64 chunk_offset,
u64 start, u64 num_bytes)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->dev_root;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct btrfs_dev_extent *extent;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
struct btrfs_key key;
int ret;
WARN_ON(!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_IN_FS_METADATA, &device->dev_state));
WARN_ON(test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state));
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
key.objectid = device->devid;
key.type = BTRFS_DEV_EXTENT_KEY;
key.offset = start;
ret = btrfs_insert_empty_item(trans, root, path, &key, sizeof(*extent));
if (ret)
goto out;
leaf = path->nodes[0];
extent = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0], struct btrfs_dev_extent);
btrfs_set_dev_extent_chunk_tree(leaf, extent, BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID);
btrfs_set_dev_extent_chunk_objectid(leaf, extent,
BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID);
btrfs_set_dev_extent_chunk_offset(leaf, extent, chunk_offset);
btrfs_set_dev_extent_length(leaf, extent, num_bytes);
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf);
out:
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
/*
* This function belongs to phase 2.
*
* See the comment at btrfs_chunk_alloc() for details about the chunk allocation
* phases.
*/
static int insert_dev_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 chunk_offset, u64 chunk_size)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_device *device;
struct extent_map *em;
struct map_lookup *map;
u64 dev_offset;
u64 stripe_size;
int i;
int ret = 0;
em = btrfs_get_chunk_map(fs_info, chunk_offset, chunk_size);
if (IS_ERR(em))
return PTR_ERR(em);
map = em->map_lookup;
stripe_size = em->orig_block_len;
/*
* Take the device list mutex to prevent races with the final phase of
* a device replace operation that replaces the device object associated
* with the map's stripes, because the device object's id can change
* at any time during that final phase of the device replace operation
* (dev-replace.c:btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()), so we could grab the
* replaced device and then see it with an ID of BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID,
* resulting in persisting a device extent item with such ID.
*/
mutex_lock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
for (i = 0; i < map->num_stripes; i++) {
device = map->stripes[i].dev;
dev_offset = map->stripes[i].physical;
ret = insert_dev_extent(trans, device, chunk_offset, dev_offset,
stripe_size);
if (ret)
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex);
free_extent_map(em);
return ret;
}
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
/*
* This function, btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), belongs to the phase 2 of
* chunk allocation.
*
* See the comment at btrfs_chunk_alloc() for details about the chunk allocation
* phases.
*/
void btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
int ret = 0;
while (!list_empty(&trans->new_bgs)) {
btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-09-01 21:40:38 +00:00
int index;
block_group = list_first_entry(&trans->new_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
bg_list);
if (ret)
goto next;
btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-09-01 21:40:38 +00:00
index = btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(block_group->flags);
ret = insert_block_group_item(trans, block_group);
if (ret)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
if (!block_group->chunk_item_inserted) {
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, block_group);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
if (ret)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
}
ret = insert_dev_extents(trans, block_group->start,
block_group->length);
if (ret)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
add_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group);
btrfs: do not create raid sysfs entries under any locks While running xfstests btrfs/177 I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff97066aa56760 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xb0 sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x60/0xb0 kobject_add_internal+0xc0/0x2c0 kobject_add+0x6e/0x90 btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type+0x102/0x160 btrfs_make_block_group+0x167/0x230 btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54f/0xb80 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x18e/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_new_inode+0x225/0x730 btrfs_create+0xab/0x1f0 lookup_open.isra.0+0x52d/0x690 path_openat+0x2a7/0x9e0 do_filp_open+0x75/0x100 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2a/0x8f __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x80/0x240 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x119/0x120 btrfs_evict_inode+0x357/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 do_unlinkat+0x1a9/0x2b0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff9fd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff9fd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff9706629780e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #5 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because when we link in a block group with a new raid index type we'll create the corresponding sysfs entries for it. This is problematic because while restriping we're holding the chunk_mutex, and while mounting we're holding the tree locks. Fixing this isn't pretty, we move the call to the sysfs stuff into the btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() work, where we're not holding any locks. This creates a slight race where other threads could see that there's no sysfs kobj for that raid type, and race to create the sysfs dir. Fix this by wrapping the creation in space_info->lock, so we only get one thread calling kobject_add() for the new directory. We don't worry about the lock on cleanup as it only gets deleted on unmount. On mount it's more straightforward, we loop through the space_infos already, just check every raid index in each space_info and added the sysfs entries for the corresponding block groups. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-09-01 21:40:38 +00:00
/*
* If we restriped during balance, we may have added a new raid
* type, so now add the sysfs entries when it is safe to do so.
* We don't have to worry about locking here as it's handled in
* btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type.
*/
if (block_group->space_info->block_group_kobjs[index] == NULL)
btrfs_sysfs_add_block_group_type(block_group);
/* Already aborted the transaction if it failed. */
next:
btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);
list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
}
btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata(trans);
}
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
struct btrfs_block_group *btrfs_make_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 bytes_used, u64 type,
u64 chunk_offset, u64 size)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
int ret;
btrfs_set_log_full_commit(trans);
cache = btrfs_create_block_group_cache(fs_info, chunk_offset);
if (!cache)
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
cache->length = size;
set_free_space_tree_thresholds(cache);
cache->used = bytes_used;
cache->flags = type;
cache->last_byte_to_unpin = (u64)-1;
cache->cached = BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED;
if (btrfs_fs_compat_ro(fs_info, FREE_SPACE_TREE))
cache->needs_free_space = 1;
ret = btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info(cache, true);
if (ret) {
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
/*
* New block group is likely to be used soon. Try to activate it now.
* Failure is OK for now.
*/
btrfs_zone_activate(cache);
ret = exclude_super_stripes(cache);
if (ret) {
/* We may have excluded something, so call this just in case */
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
add_new_free_space(cache, chunk_offset, chunk_offset + size);
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(cache);
#ifdef CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG
if (btrfs_should_fragment_free_space(cache)) {
u64 new_bytes_used = size - bytes_used;
bytes_used += new_bytes_used >> 1;
fragment_free_space(cache);
}
#endif
/*
* Ensure the corresponding space_info object is created and
* assigned to our block group. We want our bg to be added to the rbtree
* with its ->space_info set.
*/
cache->space_info = btrfs_find_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags);
ASSERT(cache->space_info);
ret = btrfs_add_block_group_cache(fs_info, cache);
if (ret) {
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(cache);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
/*
* Now that our block group has its ->space_info set and is inserted in
* the rbtree, update the space info's counters.
*/
trace_btrfs_add_block_group(fs_info, cache, 1);
btrfs_update_space_info(fs_info, cache->flags, size, bytes_used,
cache->bytes_super, cache->zone_unusable,
&cache->space_info);
btrfs_update_global_block_rsv(fs_info);
link_block_group(cache);
list_add_tail(&cache->bg_list, &trans->new_bgs);
trans->delayed_ref_updates++;
btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv(trans);
set_avail_alloc_bits(fs_info, type);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return cache;
}
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
/*
* Mark one block group RO, can be called several times for the same block
* group.
*
* @cache: the destination block group
* @do_chunk_alloc: whether need to do chunk pre-allocation, this is to
* ensure we still have some free space after marking this
* block group RO.
*/
int btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
bool do_chunk_alloc)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = cache->fs_info;
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
u64 alloc_flags;
int ret;
bool dirty_bg_running;
do {
trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root);
if (IS_ERR(trans))
return PTR_ERR(trans);
dirty_bg_running = false;
/*
* We're not allowed to set block groups readonly after the dirty
* block group cache has started writing. If it already started,
* back off and let this transaction commit.
*/
mutex_lock(&fs_info->ro_block_group_mutex);
if (test_bit(BTRFS_TRANS_DIRTY_BG_RUN, &trans->transaction->flags)) {
u64 transid = trans->transid;
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->ro_block_group_mutex);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
ret = btrfs_wait_for_commit(fs_info, transid);
if (ret)
return ret;
dirty_bg_running = true;
}
} while (dirty_bg_running);
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
if (do_chunk_alloc) {
/*
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
* If we are changing raid levels, try to allocate a
* corresponding block group with the new raid level.
*/
btrfs: don't adjust bg flags and use default allocation profiles btrfs/061 has been failing consistently for me recently with a transaction abort. We run out of space in the system chunk array, which means we've allocated way too many system chunks than we need. Chris added this a long time ago for balance as a poor mans restriping. If you had a single disk and then added another disk and then did a balance, update_block_group_flags would then figure out which RAID level you needed. Fast forward to today and we have restriping behavior, so we can explicitly tell the fs that we're trying to change the raid level. This is accomplished through the normal get_alloc_profile path. Furthermore this code actually causes btrfs/061 to fail, because we do things like mkfs -m dup -d single with multiple devices. This trips this check alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(fs_info, cache->flags); if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) { ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE); in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro. Because we're balancing and scrubbing, but not actually restriping, we keep forcing chunk allocation of RAID1 chunks. This eventually causes us to run out of system space and the file system aborts and flips read only. We don't need this poor mans restriping any more, simply use the normal get_alloc_profile helper, which will get the correct alloc_flags and thus make the right decision for chunk allocation. This keeps us from allocating a billion system chunks and falling over. Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-21 14:48:45 +00:00
alloc_flags = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(fs_info, cache->flags);
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) {
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
/*
* ENOSPC is allowed here, we may have enough space
* already allocated at the new raid level to carry on
*/
if (ret == -ENOSPC)
ret = 0;
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
}
}
ret = inc_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrub When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-05 12:55:37 +00:00
if (!do_chunk_alloc || ret == -ETXTBSY)
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
goto unlock_out;
if (!ret)
goto out;
alloc_flags = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(fs_info, cache->space_info->flags);
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
ret = inc_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrub When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-05 12:55:37 +00:00
if (ret == -ETXTBSY)
goto unlock_out;
out:
if (cache->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) {
btrfs: don't adjust bg flags and use default allocation profiles btrfs/061 has been failing consistently for me recently with a transaction abort. We run out of space in the system chunk array, which means we've allocated way too many system chunks than we need. Chris added this a long time ago for balance as a poor mans restriping. If you had a single disk and then added another disk and then did a balance, update_block_group_flags would then figure out which RAID level you needed. Fast forward to today and we have restriping behavior, so we can explicitly tell the fs that we're trying to change the raid level. This is accomplished through the normal get_alloc_profile path. Furthermore this code actually causes btrfs/061 to fail, because we do things like mkfs -m dup -d single with multiple devices. This trips this check alloc_flags = update_block_group_flags(fs_info, cache->flags); if (alloc_flags != cache->flags) { ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE); in btrfs_inc_block_group_ro. Because we're balancing and scrubbing, but not actually restriping, we keep forcing chunk allocation of RAID1 chunks. This eventually causes us to run out of system space and the file system aborts and flips read only. We don't need this poor mans restriping any more, simply use the normal get_alloc_profile helper, which will get the correct alloc_flags and thus make the right decision for chunk allocation. This keeps us from allocating a billion system chunks and falling over. Tested-by: Holger Hoffstätte <holger@applied-asynchrony.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-07-21 14:48:45 +00:00
alloc_flags = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(fs_info, cache->flags);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
check_system_chunk(trans, alloc_flags);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
}
btrfs: scrub: Don't check free space before marking a block group RO [BUG] When running btrfs/072 with only one online CPU, it has a pretty high chance to fail: btrfs/072 12s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.dmesg) - output mismatch (see xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/072.out 2019-10-22 15:18:14.008965340 +0800 +++ /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/072.out.bad 2019-11-14 15:56:45.877152240 +0800 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 072 Silence is golden +Scrub find errors in "-m dup -d single" test ... And with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device dm-5): scrub: started on devid 1 ------------[ cut here ]------------ BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -27) WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 55087 at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1890 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] CPU: 0 PID: 55087 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W O 5.4.0-rc1-custom+ #13 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x3e6/0x470 [btrfs] Call Trace: __btrfs_end_transaction+0xdb/0x310 [btrfs] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_inc_block_group_ro+0x1c9/0x210 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x264/0x940 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x45c/0x8f0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x31a1/0x3fb0 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x636/0xaa0 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x79/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe ---[ end trace 166c865cec7688e7 ]--- [CAUSE] The error number -27 is -EFBIG, returned from the following call chain: btrfs_end_transaction() |- __btrfs_end_transaction() |- btrfs_create_pending_block_groups() |- btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc() |- btrfs_add_system_chunk() This happens because we have used up all space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. The root cause is, we have the following bad loop of creating tons of system chunks: 1. The only SYSTEM chunk is being scrubbed It's very common to have only one SYSTEM chunk. 2. New SYSTEM bg will be allocated As btrfs_inc_block_group_ro() will check if we have enough space after marking current bg RO. If not, then allocate a new chunk. 3. New SYSTEM bg is still empty, will be reclaimed During the reclaim, we will mark it RO again. 4. That newly allocated empty SYSTEM bg get scrubbed We go back to step 2, as the bg is already mark RO but still not cleaned up yet. If the cleaner kthread doesn't get executed fast enough (e.g. only one CPU), then we will get more and more empty SYSTEM chunks, using up all the space of btrfs_super_block::sys_chunk_array. [FIX] Since scrub/dev-replace doesn't always need to allocate new extent, especially chunk tree extent, so we don't really need to do chunk pre-allocation. To break above spiral, here we introduce a new parameter to btrfs_inc_block_group(), @do_chunk_alloc, which indicates whether we need extra chunk pre-allocation. For relocation, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=true, while for scrub, we pass @do_chunk_alloc=false. This should keep unnecessary empty chunks from popping up for scrub. Also, since there are two parameters for btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(), add more comment for it. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-11-15 02:09:00 +00:00
unlock_out:
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->ro_block_group_mutex);
btrfs_end_transaction(trans);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
u64 num_bytes;
BUG_ON(!cache->ro);
spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (!--cache->ro) {
if (btrfs_is_zoned(cache->fs_info)) {
/* Migrate zone_unusable bytes back */
cache->zone_unusable =
(cache->alloc_offset - cache->used) +
(cache->length - cache->zone_capacity);
sinfo->bytes_zone_unusable += cache->zone_unusable;
sinfo->bytes_readonly -= cache->zone_unusable;
}
num_bytes = cache->length - cache->reserved -
cache->pinned - cache->bytes_super -
cache->zone_unusable - cache->used;
sinfo->bytes_readonly -= num_bytes;
list_del_init(&cache->ro_list);
}
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&sinfo->lock);
}
static int update_block_group_item(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path,
struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
int ret;
struct btrfs_root *root = btrfs_block_group_root(fs_info);
unsigned long bi;
struct extent_buffer *leaf;
struct btrfs_block_group_item bgi;
struct btrfs_key key;
key.objectid = cache->start;
key.type = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_ITEM_KEY;
key.offset = cache->length;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, 0, 1);
if (ret) {
if (ret > 0)
ret = -ENOENT;
goto fail;
}
leaf = path->nodes[0];
bi = btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, path->slots[0]);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_used(&bgi, cache->used);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_chunk_objectid(&bgi,
BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID);
btrfs_set_stack_block_group_flags(&bgi, cache->flags);
write_extent_buffer(leaf, &bgi, bi, sizeof(bgi));
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf);
fail:
btrfs_release_path(path);
return ret;
}
static int cache_save_setup(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_path *path)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
struct btrfs_root *root = fs_info->tree_root;
struct inode *inode = NULL;
struct extent_changeset *data_reserved = NULL;
u64 alloc_hint = 0;
int dcs = BTRFS_DC_ERROR;
u64 cache_size = 0;
int retries = 0;
int ret = 0;
if (!btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE))
return 0;
/*
* If this block group is smaller than 100 megs don't bother caching the
* block group.
*/
if (block_group->length < (100 * SZ_1M)) {
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
block_group->disk_cache_state = BTRFS_DC_WRITTEN;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
return 0;
}
if (TRANS_ABORTED(trans))
return 0;
again:
inode = lookup_free_space_inode(block_group, path);
if (IS_ERR(inode) && PTR_ERR(inode) != -ENOENT) {
ret = PTR_ERR(inode);
btrfs_release_path(path);
goto out;
}
if (IS_ERR(inode)) {
BUG_ON(retries);
retries++;
if (block_group->ro)
goto out_free;
ret = create_free_space_inode(trans, block_group, path);
if (ret)
goto out_free;
goto again;
}
/*
* We want to set the generation to 0, that way if anything goes wrong
* from here on out we know not to trust this cache when we load up next
* time.
*/
BTRFS_I(inode)->generation = 0;
ret = btrfs_update_inode(trans, root, BTRFS_I(inode));
if (ret) {
/*
* So theoretically we could recover from this, simply set the
* super cache generation to 0 so we know to invalidate the
* cache, but then we'd have to keep track of the block groups
* that fail this way so we know we _have_ to reset this cache
* before the next commit or risk reading stale cache. So to
* limit our exposure to horrible edge cases lets just abort the
* transaction, this only happens in really bad situations
* anyway.
*/
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out_put;
}
WARN_ON(ret);
/* We've already setup this transaction, go ahead and exit */
if (block_group->cache_generation == trans->transid &&
i_size_read(inode)) {
dcs = BTRFS_DC_SETUP;
goto out_put;
}
if (i_size_read(inode) > 0) {
ret = btrfs_check_trunc_cache_free_space(fs_info,
&fs_info->global_block_rsv);
if (ret)
goto out_put;
ret = btrfs_truncate_free_space_cache(trans, NULL, inode);
if (ret)
goto out_put;
}
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
if (block_group->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED ||
!btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE)) {
/*
* don't bother trying to write stuff out _if_
* a) we're not cached,
* b) we're with nospace_cache mount option,
* c) we're with v2 space_cache (FREE_SPACE_TREE).
*/
dcs = BTRFS_DC_WRITTEN;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
goto out_put;
}
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
/*
* We hit an ENOSPC when setting up the cache in this transaction, just
* skip doing the setup, we've already cleared the cache so we're safe.
*/
if (test_bit(BTRFS_TRANS_CACHE_ENOSPC, &trans->transaction->flags)) {
ret = -ENOSPC;
goto out_put;
}
/*
* Try to preallocate enough space based on how big the block group is.
* Keep in mind this has to include any pinned space which could end up
* taking up quite a bit since it's not folded into the other space
* cache.
*/
cache_size = div_u64(block_group->length, SZ_256M);
if (!cache_size)
cache_size = 1;
cache_size *= 16;
cache_size *= fs_info->sectorsize;
ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(BTRFS_I(inode), &data_reserved, 0,
cache_size);
if (ret)
goto out_put;
ret = btrfs_prealloc_file_range_trans(inode, trans, 0, 0, cache_size,
cache_size, cache_size,
&alloc_hint);
/*
* Our cache requires contiguous chunks so that we don't modify a bunch
* of metadata or split extents when writing the cache out, which means
* we can enospc if we are heavily fragmented in addition to just normal
* out of space conditions. So if we hit this just skip setting up any
* other block groups for this transaction, maybe we'll unpin enough
* space the next time around.
*/
if (!ret)
dcs = BTRFS_DC_SETUP;
else if (ret == -ENOSPC)
set_bit(BTRFS_TRANS_CACHE_ENOSPC, &trans->transaction->flags);
out_put:
iput(inode);
out_free:
btrfs_release_path(path);
out:
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
if (!ret && dcs == BTRFS_DC_SETUP)
block_group->cache_generation = trans->transid;
block_group->disk_cache_state = dcs;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
extent_changeset_free(data_reserved);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_setup_space_cache(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache, *tmp;
struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
struct btrfs_path *path;
if (list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs) ||
!btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SPACE_CACHE))
return 0;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
/* Could add new block groups, use _safe just in case */
list_for_each_entry_safe(cache, tmp, &cur_trans->dirty_bgs,
dirty_list) {
if (cache->disk_cache_state == BTRFS_DC_CLEAR)
cache_save_setup(cache, trans, path);
}
btrfs_free_path(path);
return 0;
}
/*
* Transaction commit does final block group cache writeback during a critical
* section where nothing is allowed to change the FS. This is required in
* order for the cache to actually match the block group, but can introduce a
* lot of latency into the commit.
*
* So, btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups is here to kick off block group cache IO.
* There's a chance we'll have to redo some of it if the block group changes
* again during the commit, but it greatly reduces the commit latency by
* getting rid of the easy block groups while we're still allowing others to
* join the commit.
*/
int btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
int ret = 0;
int should_put;
struct btrfs_path *path = NULL;
LIST_HEAD(dirty);
struct list_head *io = &cur_trans->io_bgs;
int num_started = 0;
int loops = 0;
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
if (list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs)) {
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
return 0;
}
list_splice_init(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs, &dirty);
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
again:
/* Make sure all the block groups on our dirty list actually exist */
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(trans);
if (!path) {
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
btrfs: splice remaining dirty_bg's onto the transaction dirty bg list While doing error injection testing with my relocation patches I hit the following assert: assertion failed: list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list), in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3356 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3357! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 24351 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3+ #193 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a RSP: 0018:ffffa09b019c7e00 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000056 RBX: ffff8f6492c18000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8f64fbc27c60 RSI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RDI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RBP: ffff8f6483bbdc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffa09b019c7c38 R11: ffffffff85d70928 R12: ffff8f6492c18100 R13: ffff8f6492c18148 R14: ffff8f6483bbdd70 R15: dead000000000100 FS: 00007fbfda4cdc40(0000) GS:ffff8f64fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fbfda666fd0 CR3: 000000013cf66002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x55/0x55 close_ctree+0x2c5/0x306 ? fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14/0x100 generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b1/0x1d0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happened because I injected an error in btrfs_cow_block() while running the dirty block groups. When we run the dirty block groups, we splice the list onto a local list to process. However if an error occurs, we only cleanup the transactions dirty block group list, not any pending block groups we have on our locally spliced list. In fact if we fail to allocate a path in this function we'll also fail to clean up the splice list. Fix this by splicing the list back onto the transaction dirty block group list so that the block groups are cleaned up. Then add a 'out' label and have the error conditions jump to out so that the errors are handled properly. This also has the side-effect of fixing a problem where we would clear 'ret' on error because we unconditionally ran btrfs_run_delayed_refs(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-01-14 19:02:43 +00:00
if (!path) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
}
/*
* cache_write_mutex is here only to save us from balance or automatic
* removal of empty block groups deleting this block group while we are
* writing out the cache
*/
mutex_lock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
while (!list_empty(&dirty)) {
bool drop_reserve = true;
cache = list_first_entry(&dirty, struct btrfs_block_group,
dirty_list);
/*
* This can happen if something re-dirties a block group that
* is already under IO. Just wait for it to finish and then do
* it all again
*/
if (!list_empty(&cache->io_list)) {
list_del_init(&cache->io_list);
btrfs_wait_cache_io(trans, cache, path);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
}
/*
* btrfs_wait_cache_io uses the cache->dirty_list to decide if
* it should update the cache_state. Don't delete until after
* we wait.
*
* Since we're not running in the commit critical section
* we need the dirty_bgs_lock to protect from update_block_group
*/
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
list_del_init(&cache->dirty_list);
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
should_put = 1;
cache_save_setup(cache, trans, path);
if (cache->disk_cache_state == BTRFS_DC_SETUP) {
cache->io_ctl.inode = NULL;
ret = btrfs_write_out_cache(trans, cache, path);
if (ret == 0 && cache->io_ctl.inode) {
num_started++;
should_put = 0;
/*
* The cache_write_mutex is protecting the
* io_list, also refer to the definition of
* btrfs_transaction::io_bgs for more details
*/
list_add_tail(&cache->io_list, io);
} else {
/*
* If we failed to write the cache, the
* generation will be bad and life goes on
*/
ret = 0;
}
}
if (!ret) {
ret = update_block_group_item(trans, path, cache);
/*
* Our block group might still be attached to the list
* of new block groups in the transaction handle of some
* other task (struct btrfs_trans_handle->new_bgs). This
* means its block group item isn't yet in the extent
* tree. If this happens ignore the error, as we will
* try again later in the critical section of the
* transaction commit.
*/
if (ret == -ENOENT) {
ret = 0;
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
if (list_empty(&cache->dirty_list)) {
list_add_tail(&cache->dirty_list,
&cur_trans->dirty_bgs);
btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
drop_reserve = false;
}
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
} else if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
}
}
/* If it's not on the io list, we need to put the block group */
if (should_put)
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
if (drop_reserve)
btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);
/*
* Avoid blocking other tasks for too long. It might even save
* us from writing caches for block groups that are going to be
* removed.
*/
mutex_unlock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
btrfs: splice remaining dirty_bg's onto the transaction dirty bg list While doing error injection testing with my relocation patches I hit the following assert: assertion failed: list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list), in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3356 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3357! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 24351 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3+ #193 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a RSP: 0018:ffffa09b019c7e00 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000056 RBX: ffff8f6492c18000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8f64fbc27c60 RSI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RDI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RBP: ffff8f6483bbdc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffa09b019c7c38 R11: ffffffff85d70928 R12: ffff8f6492c18100 R13: ffff8f6492c18148 R14: ffff8f6483bbdd70 R15: dead000000000100 FS: 00007fbfda4cdc40(0000) GS:ffff8f64fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fbfda666fd0 CR3: 000000013cf66002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x55/0x55 close_ctree+0x2c5/0x306 ? fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14/0x100 generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b1/0x1d0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happened because I injected an error in btrfs_cow_block() while running the dirty block groups. When we run the dirty block groups, we splice the list onto a local list to process. However if an error occurs, we only cleanup the transactions dirty block group list, not any pending block groups we have on our locally spliced list. In fact if we fail to allocate a path in this function we'll also fail to clean up the splice list. Fix this by splicing the list back onto the transaction dirty block group list so that the block groups are cleaned up. Then add a 'out' label and have the error conditions jump to out so that the errors are handled properly. This also has the side-effect of fixing a problem where we would clear 'ret' on error because we unconditionally ran btrfs_run_delayed_refs(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-01-14 19:02:43 +00:00
if (ret)
goto out;
mutex_lock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
}
mutex_unlock(&trans->transaction->cache_write_mutex);
/*
* Go through delayed refs for all the stuff we've just kicked off
* and then loop back (just once)
*/
if (!ret)
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans, 0);
if (!ret && loops == 0) {
loops++;
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
list_splice_init(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs, &dirty);
/*
* dirty_bgs_lock protects us from concurrent block group
* deletes too (not just cache_write_mutex).
*/
if (!list_empty(&dirty)) {
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
goto again;
}
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
btrfs: splice remaining dirty_bg's onto the transaction dirty bg list While doing error injection testing with my relocation patches I hit the following assert: assertion failed: list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list), in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3356 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3357! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 0 PID: 24351 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.10.0-rc3+ #193 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a RSP: 0018:ffffa09b019c7e00 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000056 RBX: ffff8f6492c18000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: ffff8f64fbc27c60 RSI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RDI: ffff8f64fbc19050 RBP: ffff8f6483bbdc00 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffa09b019c7c38 R11: ffffffff85d70928 R12: ffff8f6492c18100 R13: ffff8f6492c18148 R14: ffff8f6483bbdd70 R15: dead000000000100 FS: 00007fbfda4cdc40(0000) GS:ffff8f64fbc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fbfda666fd0 CR3: 000000013cf66002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 Call Trace: btrfs_free_block_groups.cold+0x55/0x55 close_ctree+0x2c5/0x306 ? fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x14/0x100 generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b1/0x1d0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 This happened because I injected an error in btrfs_cow_block() while running the dirty block groups. When we run the dirty block groups, we splice the list onto a local list to process. However if an error occurs, we only cleanup the transactions dirty block group list, not any pending block groups we have on our locally spliced list. In fact if we fail to allocate a path in this function we'll also fail to clean up the splice list. Fix this by splicing the list back onto the transaction dirty block group list so that the block groups are cleaned up. Then add a 'out' label and have the error conditions jump to out so that the errors are handled properly. This also has the side-effect of fixing a problem where we would clear 'ret' on error because we unconditionally ran btrfs_run_delayed_refs(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-01-14 19:02:43 +00:00
}
out:
if (ret < 0) {
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
list_splice_init(&dirty, &cur_trans->dirty_bgs);
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs(cur_trans, fs_info);
}
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache;
struct btrfs_transaction *cur_trans = trans->transaction;
int ret = 0;
int should_put;
struct btrfs_path *path;
struct list_head *io = &cur_trans->io_bgs;
int num_started = 0;
path = btrfs_alloc_path();
if (!path)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
* Even though we are in the critical section of the transaction commit,
* we can still have concurrent tasks adding elements to this
* transaction's list of dirty block groups. These tasks correspond to
* endio free space workers started when writeback finishes for a
* space cache, which run inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io(), and can
* allocate new block groups as a result of COWing nodes of the root
* tree when updating the free space inode. The writeback for the space
* caches is triggered by an earlier call to
* btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups() and iterations of the following
* loop.
* Also we want to do the cache_save_setup first and then run the
* delayed refs to make sure we have the best chance at doing this all
* in one shot.
*/
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
while (!list_empty(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs)) {
cache = list_first_entry(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
dirty_list);
/*
* This can happen if cache_save_setup re-dirties a block group
* that is already under IO. Just wait for it to finish and
* then do it all again
*/
if (!list_empty(&cache->io_list)) {
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
list_del_init(&cache->io_list);
btrfs_wait_cache_io(trans, cache, path);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
}
/*
* Don't remove from the dirty list until after we've waited on
* any pending IO
*/
list_del_init(&cache->dirty_list);
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
should_put = 1;
cache_save_setup(cache, trans, path);
if (!ret)
ret = btrfs_run_delayed_refs(trans,
(unsigned long) -1);
if (!ret && cache->disk_cache_state == BTRFS_DC_SETUP) {
cache->io_ctl.inode = NULL;
ret = btrfs_write_out_cache(trans, cache, path);
if (ret == 0 && cache->io_ctl.inode) {
num_started++;
should_put = 0;
list_add_tail(&cache->io_list, io);
} else {
/*
* If we failed to write the cache, the
* generation will be bad and life goes on
*/
ret = 0;
}
}
if (!ret) {
ret = update_block_group_item(trans, path, cache);
/*
* One of the free space endio workers might have
* created a new block group while updating a free space
* cache's inode (at inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io())
* and hasn't released its transaction handle yet, in
* which case the new block group is still attached to
* its transaction handle and its creation has not
* finished yet (no block group item in the extent tree
* yet, etc). If this is the case, wait for all free
* space endio workers to finish and retry. This is a
* very rare case so no need for a more efficient and
* complex approach.
*/
if (ret == -ENOENT) {
wait_event(cur_trans->writer_wait,
atomic_read(&cur_trans->num_writers) == 1);
ret = update_block_group_item(trans, path, cache);
}
if (ret)
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
}
/* If its not on the io list, we need to put the block group */
if (should_put)
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);
spin_lock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&cur_trans->dirty_bgs_lock);
/*
* Refer to the definition of io_bgs member for details why it's safe
* to use it without any locking
*/
while (!list_empty(io)) {
cache = list_first_entry(io, struct btrfs_block_group,
io_list);
list_del_init(&cache->io_list);
btrfs_wait_cache_io(trans, cache, path);
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
}
btrfs_free_path(path);
return ret;
}
int btrfs_update_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 bytenr, u64 num_bytes, bool alloc)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_block_group *cache = NULL;
u64 total = num_bytes;
u64 old_val;
u64 byte_in_group;
int factor;
int ret = 0;
/* Block accounting for super block */
spin_lock(&info->delalloc_root_lock);
old_val = btrfs_super_bytes_used(info->super_copy);
if (alloc)
old_val += num_bytes;
else
old_val -= num_bytes;
btrfs_set_super_bytes_used(info->super_copy, old_val);
spin_unlock(&info->delalloc_root_lock);
while (total) {
cache = btrfs_lookup_block_group(info, bytenr);
if (!cache) {
ret = -ENOENT;
break;
}
factor = btrfs_bg_type_to_factor(cache->flags);
/*
* If this block group has free space cache written out, we
* need to make sure to load it if we are removing space. This
* is because we need the unpinning stage to actually add the
* space back to the block group, otherwise we will leak space.
*/
if (!alloc && !btrfs_block_group_done(cache))
btrfs_cache_block_group(cache, 1);
byte_in_group = bytenr - cache->start;
WARN_ON(byte_in_group > cache->length);
spin_lock(&cache->space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (btrfs_test_opt(info, SPACE_CACHE) &&
cache->disk_cache_state < BTRFS_DC_CLEAR)
cache->disk_cache_state = BTRFS_DC_CLEAR;
old_val = cache->used;
num_bytes = min(total, cache->length - byte_in_group);
if (alloc) {
old_val += num_bytes;
cache->used = old_val;
cache->reserved -= num_bytes;
cache->space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes;
cache->space_info->bytes_used += num_bytes;
cache->space_info->disk_used += num_bytes * factor;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock);
} else {
old_val -= num_bytes;
cache->used = old_val;
cache->pinned += num_bytes;
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_pinned(info,
cache->space_info, num_bytes);
cache->space_info->bytes_used -= num_bytes;
cache->space_info->disk_used -= num_bytes * factor;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&cache->space_info->lock);
set_extent_dirty(&trans->transaction->pinned_extents,
bytenr, bytenr + num_bytes - 1,
GFP_NOFS | __GFP_NOFAIL);
}
spin_lock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
if (list_empty(&cache->dirty_list)) {
list_add_tail(&cache->dirty_list,
&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs);
trans->delayed_ref_updates++;
btrfs_get_block_group(cache);
}
spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->dirty_bgs_lock);
/*
* No longer have used bytes in this block group, queue it for
* deletion. We do this after adding the block group to the
* dirty list to avoid races between cleaner kthread and space
* cache writeout.
*/
btrfs: handle empty block_group removal for async discard block_group removal is a little tricky. It can race with the extent allocator, the cleaner thread, and balancing. The current path is for a block_group to be added to the unused_bgs list. Then, when the cleaner thread comes around, it starts a transaction and then proceeds with removing the block_group. Extents that are pinned are subsequently removed from the pinned trees and then eventually a discard is issued for the entire block_group. Async discard introduces another player into the game, the discard workqueue. While it has none of the racing issues, the new problem is ensuring we don't leave free space untrimmed prior to forgetting the block_group. This is handled by placing fully free block_groups on a separate discard queue. This is necessary to maintain discarding order as in the future we will slowly trim even fully free block_groups. The ordering helps us make progress on the same block_group rather than say the last fully freed block_group or needing to search through the fully freed block groups at the beginning of a list and insert after. The new order of events is a fully freed block group gets placed on the unused discard queue first. Once it's processed, it will be placed on the unusued_bgs list and then the original sequence of events will happen, just without the final whole block_group discard. The mount flags can change when processing unused_bgs, so when flipping from DISCARD to DISCARD_ASYNC, the unused_bgs must be punted to the discard_list to be trimmed. If we flip off DISCARD_ASYNC, we punt free block groups on the discard_list to the unused_bg queue which will do the final discard for us. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2019-12-14 00:22:15 +00:00
if (!alloc && old_val == 0) {
if (!btrfs_test_opt(info, DISCARD_ASYNC))
btrfs_mark_bg_unused(cache);
}
btrfs_put_block_group(cache);
total -= num_bytes;
bytenr += num_bytes;
}
/* Modified block groups are accounted for in the delayed_refs_rsv. */
btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv(trans);
return ret;
}
/**
* btrfs_add_reserved_bytes - update the block_group and space info counters
* @cache: The cache we are manipulating
* @ram_bytes: The number of bytes of file content, and will be same to
* @num_bytes except for the compress path.
* @num_bytes: The number of bytes in question
* @delalloc: The blocks are allocated for the delalloc write
*
* This is called by the allocator when it reserves space. If this is a
* reservation and the block group has become read only we cannot make the
* reservation and return -EAGAIN, otherwise this function always succeeds.
*/
int btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
u64 ram_bytes, u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
int ret = 0;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (cache->ro) {
ret = -EAGAIN;
} else {
cache->reserved += num_bytes;
space_info->bytes_reserved += num_bytes;
trace_btrfs_space_reservation(cache->fs_info, "space_info",
space_info->flags, num_bytes, 1);
btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use(cache->fs_info,
space_info, -ram_bytes);
if (delalloc)
cache->delalloc_bytes += num_bytes;
/*
* Compression can use less space than we reserved, so wake
* tickets if that happens
*/
if (num_bytes < ram_bytes)
btrfs_try_granting_tickets(cache->fs_info, space_info);
}
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return ret;
}
/**
* btrfs_free_reserved_bytes - update the block_group and space info counters
* @cache: The cache we are manipulating
* @num_bytes: The number of bytes in question
* @delalloc: The blocks are allocated for the delalloc write
*
* This is called by somebody who is freeing space that was never actually used
* on disk. For example if you reserve some space for a new leaf in transaction
* A and before transaction A commits you free that leaf, you call this with
* reserve set to 0 in order to clear the reservation.
*/
void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group *cache,
u64 num_bytes, int delalloc)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
if (cache->ro)
space_info->bytes_readonly += num_bytes;
cache->reserved -= num_bytes;
space_info->bytes_reserved -= num_bytes;
space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
if (delalloc)
cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes;
spin_unlock(&cache->lock);
btrfs_try_granting_tickets(cache->fs_info, space_info);
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
}
static void force_metadata_allocation(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
struct list_head *head = &info->space_info;
struct btrfs_space_info *found;
list_for_each_entry(found, head, list) {
if (found->flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)
found->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE;
}
}
static int should_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo, int force)
{
u64 bytes_used = btrfs_space_info_used(sinfo, false);
u64 thresh;
if (force == CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE)
return 1;
/*
* in limited mode, we want to have some free space up to
* about 1% of the FS size.
*/
if (force == CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED) {
thresh = btrfs_super_total_bytes(fs_info->super_copy);
thresh = max_t(u64, SZ_64M, div_factor_fine(thresh, 1));
if (sinfo->total_bytes - bytes_used < thresh)
return 1;
}
if (bytes_used + SZ_2M < div_factor(sinfo->total_bytes, 8))
return 0;
return 1;
}
int btrfs_force_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 type)
{
u64 alloc_flags = btrfs_get_alloc_profile(trans->fs_info, type);
return btrfs_chunk_alloc(trans, alloc_flags, CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
}
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 flags)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
int ret;
/*
* Check if we have enough space in the system space info because we
* will need to update device items in the chunk btree and insert a new
* chunk item in the chunk btree as well. This will allocate a new
* system block group if needed.
*/
check_system_chunk(trans, flags);
bg = btrfs_create_chunk(trans, flags);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
if (IS_ERR(bg)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(bg);
goto out;
}
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, bg);
/*
* Normally we are not expected to fail with -ENOSPC here, since we have
* previously reserved space in the system space_info and allocated one
* new system chunk if necessary. However there are three exceptions:
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*
* 1) We may have enough free space in the system space_info but all the
* existing system block groups have a profile which can not be used
* for extent allocation.
*
* This happens when mounting in degraded mode. For example we have a
* RAID1 filesystem with 2 devices, lose one device and mount the fs
* using the other device in degraded mode. If we then allocate a chunk,
* we may have enough free space in the existing system space_info, but
* none of the block groups can be used for extent allocation since they
* have a RAID1 profile, and because we are in degraded mode with a
* single device, we are forced to allocate a new system chunk with a
* SINGLE profile. Making check_system_chunk() iterate over all system
* block groups and check if they have a usable profile and enough space
* can be slow on very large filesystems, so we tolerate the -ENOSPC and
* try again after forcing allocation of a new system chunk. Like this
* we avoid paying the cost of that search in normal circumstances, when
* we were not mounted in degraded mode;
*
* 2) We had enough free space info the system space_info, and one suitable
* block group to allocate from when we called check_system_chunk()
* above. However right after we called it, the only system block group
* with enough free space got turned into RO mode by a running scrub,
* and in this case we have to allocate a new one and retry. We only
* need do this allocate and retry once, since we have a transaction
* handle and scrub uses the commit root to search for block groups;
*
* 3) We had one system block group with enough free space when we called
* check_system_chunk(), but after that, right before we tried to
* allocate the last extent buffer we needed, a discard operation came
* in and it temporarily removed the last free space entry from the
* block group (discard removes a free space entry, discards it, and
* then adds back the entry to the block group cache).
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*/
if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
const u64 sys_flags = btrfs_system_alloc_profile(trans->fs_info);
struct btrfs_block_group *sys_bg;
sys_bg = btrfs_create_chunk(trans, sys_flags);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
if (IS_ERR(sys_bg)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(sys_bg);
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, sys_bg);
if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
ret = btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, bg);
if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
} else if (ret) {
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, ret);
goto out;
}
out:
btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata(trans);
return ret;
}
/*
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
* Chunk allocation is done in 2 phases:
*
* 1) Phase 1 - through btrfs_chunk_alloc() we allocate device extents for
* the chunk, the chunk mapping, create its block group and add the items
* that belong in the chunk btree to it - more specifically, we need to
* update device items in the chunk btree and add a new chunk item to it.
*
* 2) Phase 2 - through btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), we add the block
* group item to the extent btree and the device extent items to the devices
* btree.
*
* This is done to prevent deadlocks. For example when COWing a node from the
* extent btree we are holding a write lock on the node's parent and if we
* trigger chunk allocation and attempted to insert the new block group item
* in the extent btree right way, we could deadlock because the path for the
* insertion can include that parent node. At first glance it seems impossible
* to trigger chunk allocation after starting a transaction since tasks should
* reserve enough transaction units (metadata space), however while that is true
* most of the time, chunk allocation may still be triggered for several reasons:
*
* 1) When reserving metadata, we check if there is enough free space in the
* metadata space_info and therefore don't trigger allocation of a new chunk.
* However later when the task actually tries to COW an extent buffer from
* the extent btree or from the device btree for example, it is forced to
* allocate a new block group (chunk) because the only one that had enough
* free space was just turned to RO mode by a running scrub for example (or
* device replace, block group reclaim thread, etc), so we can not use it
* for allocating an extent and end up being forced to allocate a new one;
*
* 2) Because we only check that the metadata space_info has enough free bytes,
* we end up not allocating a new metadata chunk in that case. However if
* the filesystem was mounted in degraded mode, none of the existing block
* groups might be suitable for extent allocation due to their incompatible
* profile (for e.g. mounting a 2 devices filesystem, where all block groups
* use a RAID1 profile, in degraded mode using a single device). In this case
* when the task attempts to COW some extent buffer of the extent btree for
* example, it will trigger allocation of a new metadata block group with a
* suitable profile (SINGLE profile in the example of the degraded mount of
* the RAID1 filesystem);
*
* 3) The task has reserved enough transaction units / metadata space, but when
* it attempts to COW an extent buffer from the extent or device btree for
* example, it does not find any free extent in any metadata block group,
* therefore forced to try to allocate a new metadata block group.
* This is because some other task allocated all available extents in the
* meanwhile - this typically happens with tasks that don't reserve space
* properly, either intentionally or as a bug. One example where this is
* done intentionally is fsync, as it does not reserve any transaction units
* and ends up allocating a variable number of metadata extents for log
* tree extent buffers;
*
* 4) The task has reserved enough transaction units / metadata space, but right
* before it tries to allocate the last extent buffer it needs, a discard
* operation comes in and, temporarily, removes the last free space entry from
* the only metadata block group that had free space (discard starts by
* removing a free space entry from a block group, then does the discard
* operation and, once it's done, it adds back the free space entry to the
* block group).
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*
* We also need this 2 phases setup when adding a device to a filesystem with
* a seed device - we must create new metadata and system chunks without adding
* any of the block group items to the chunk, extent and device btrees. If we
* did not do it this way, we would get ENOSPC when attempting to update those
* btrees, since all the chunks from the seed device are read-only.
*
* Phase 1 does the updates and insertions to the chunk btree because if we had
* it done in phase 2 and have a thundering herd of tasks allocating chunks in
* parallel, we risk having too many system chunks allocated by many tasks if
* many tasks reach phase 1 without the previous ones completing phase 2. In the
* extreme case this leads to exhaustion of the system chunk array in the
* superblock. This is easier to trigger if using a btree node/leaf size of 64K
* and with RAID filesystems (so we have more device items in the chunk btree).
* This has happened before and commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of
* the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") provides more details.
*
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
* Allocation of system chunks does not happen through this function. A task that
* needs to update the chunk btree (the only btree that uses system chunks), must
* preallocate chunk space by calling either check_system_chunk() or
* btrfs_reserve_chunk_metadata() - the former is used when allocating a data or
* metadata chunk or when removing a chunk, while the later is used before doing
* a modification to the chunk btree - use cases for the later are adding,
* removing and resizing a device as well as relocation of a system chunk.
* See the comment below for more details.
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*
* The reservation of system space, done through check_system_chunk(), as well
* as all the updates and insertions into the chunk btree must be done while
* holding fs_info->chunk_mutex. This is important to guarantee that while COWing
* an extent buffer from the chunks btree we never trigger allocation of a new
* system chunk, which would result in a deadlock (trying to lock twice an
* extent buffer of the chunk btree, first time before triggering the chunk
* allocation and the second time during chunk allocation while attempting to
* update the chunks btree). The system chunk array is also updated while holding
* that mutex. The same logic applies to removing chunks - we must reserve system
* space, update the chunk btree and the system chunk array in the superblock
* while holding fs_info->chunk_mutex.
*
* This function, btrfs_chunk_alloc(), belongs to phase 1.
*
* If @force is CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE:
* - return 1 if it successfully allocates a chunk,
* - return errors including -ENOSPC otherwise.
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
* If @force is NOT CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE:
* - return 0 if it doesn't need to allocate a new chunk,
* - return 1 if it successfully allocates a chunk,
* - return errors including -ENOSPC otherwise.
*/
int btrfs_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 flags,
enum btrfs_chunk_alloc_enum force)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
bool wait_for_alloc = false;
bool should_alloc = false;
int ret = 0;
/* Don't re-enter if we're already allocating a chunk */
if (trans->allocating_chunk)
return -ENOSPC;
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
/*
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
* Allocation of system chunks can not happen through this path, as we
* could end up in a deadlock if we are allocating a data or metadata
* chunk and there is another task modifying the chunk btree.
*
* This is because while we are holding the chunk mutex, we will attempt
* to add the new chunk item to the chunk btree or update an existing
* device item in the chunk btree, while the other task that is modifying
* the chunk btree is attempting to COW an extent buffer while holding a
* lock on it and on its parent - if the COW operation triggers a system
* chunk allocation, then we can deadlock because we are holding the
* chunk mutex and we may need to access that extent buffer or its parent
* in order to add the chunk item or update a device item.
*
* Tasks that want to modify the chunk tree should reserve system space
* before updating the chunk btree, by calling either
* btrfs_reserve_chunk_metadata() or check_system_chunk().
* It's possible that after a task reserves the space, it still ends up
* here - this happens in the cases described above at do_chunk_alloc().
* The task will have to either retry or fail.
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*/
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM)
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
return -ENOSPC;
space_info = btrfs_find_space_info(fs_info, flags);
ASSERT(space_info);
do {
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
if (force < space_info->force_alloc)
force = space_info->force_alloc;
should_alloc = should_alloc_chunk(fs_info, space_info, force);
if (space_info->full) {
/* No more free physical space */
if (should_alloc)
ret = -ENOSPC;
else
ret = 0;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return ret;
} else if (!should_alloc) {
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
return 0;
} else if (space_info->chunk_alloc) {
/*
* Someone is already allocating, so we need to block
* until this someone is finished and then loop to
* recheck if we should continue with our allocation
* attempt.
*/
wait_for_alloc = true;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
} else {
/* Proceed with allocation */
space_info->chunk_alloc = 1;
wait_for_alloc = false;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
}
cond_resched();
} while (wait_for_alloc);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
trans->allocating_chunk = true;
/*
* If we have mixed data/metadata chunks we want to make sure we keep
* allocating mixed chunks instead of individual chunks.
*/
if (btrfs_mixed_space_info(space_info))
flags |= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA);
/*
* if we're doing a data chunk, go ahead and make sure that
* we keep a reasonable number of metadata chunks allocated in the
* FS as well.
*/
if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA && fs_info->metadata_ratio) {
fs_info->data_chunk_allocations++;
if (!(fs_info->data_chunk_allocations %
fs_info->metadata_ratio))
force_metadata_allocation(fs_info);
}
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
ret = do_chunk_alloc(trans, flags);
trans->allocating_chunk = false;
spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
if (ret < 0) {
if (ret == -ENOSPC)
space_info->full = 1;
else
goto out;
} else {
ret = 1;
space_info->max_extent_size = 0;
}
space_info->force_alloc = CHUNK_ALLOC_NO_FORCE;
out:
space_info->chunk_alloc = 0;
spin_unlock(&space_info->lock);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
return ret;
}
static u64 get_profile_num_devs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 type)
{
u64 num_dev;
num_dev = btrfs_raid_array[btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_index(type)].devs_max;
if (!num_dev)
num_dev = fs_info->fs_devices->rw_devices;
return num_dev;
}
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
static void reserve_chunk_space(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
u64 bytes,
u64 type)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
struct btrfs_space_info *info;
u64 left;
int ret = 0;
/*
* Needed because we can end up allocating a system chunk and for an
* atomic and race free space reservation in the chunk block reserve.
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
info = btrfs_find_space_info(fs_info, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM);
spin_lock(&info->lock);
left = info->total_bytes - btrfs_space_info_used(info, true);
spin_unlock(&info->lock);
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
if (left < bytes && btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, ENOSPC_DEBUG)) {
btrfs_info(fs_info, "left=%llu, need=%llu, flags=%llu",
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
left, bytes, type);
btrfs_dump_space_info(fs_info, info, 0, 0);
}
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
if (left < bytes) {
u64 flags = btrfs_system_alloc_profile(fs_info);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
struct btrfs_block_group *bg;
/*
* Ignore failure to create system chunk. We might end up not
* needing it, as we might not need to COW all nodes/leafs from
* the paths we visit in the chunk tree (they were already COWed
* or created in the current transaction for example).
*/
bg = btrfs_create_chunk(trans, flags);
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
if (IS_ERR(bg)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(bg);
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
} else {
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
/*
* If we fail to add the chunk item here, we end up
* trying again at phase 2 of chunk allocation, at
* btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(). So ignore
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
* any error here. An ENOSPC here could happen, due to
* the cases described at do_chunk_alloc() - the system
* block group we just created was just turned into RO
* mode by a scrub for example, or a running discard
* temporarily removed its free space entries, etc.
btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:06 +00:00
*/
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(trans, bg);
}
}
if (!ret) {
ret = btrfs_block_rsv_add(fs_info,
&fs_info->chunk_block_rsv,
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
bytes, BTRFS_RESERVE_NO_FLUSH);
btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks When a task attempting to allocate a new chunk verifies that there is not currently enough free space in the system space_info and there is another task that allocated a new system chunk but it did not finish yet the creation of the respective block group, it waits for that other task to finish creating the block group. This is to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array in the superblock, which is limited, when we have a thundering herd of tasks allocating new chunks. This problem was described and fixed by commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations"). However there are two very similar scenarios where this can lead to a deadlock: 1) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the respective system block group. However before task B ends its transaction handle and finishes the creation of the system block group, it attempts to allocate another chunk (like a data chunk for an fallocate operation for a very large range). Task B will be unable to progress and allocate the new chunk, because task A set space_info->chunk_alloc to 1 and therefore it loops at btrfs_chunk_alloc() waiting for task A to finish its chunk allocation and set space_info->chunk_alloc to 0, but task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the new system block group, therefore resulting in a deadlock; 2) Task B allocated a new system chunk and task A is waiting on task B to finish creation of the respective system block group. By the time that task B enter the final phase of block group allocation, which happens at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(), when it modifies the extent tree, the device tree or the chunk tree to insert the items for some new block group, it needs to allocate a new chunk, so it ends up at btrfs_chunk_alloc() and keeps looping there because task A has set space_info->chunk_alloc to 1, but task A is waiting for task B to finish creation of the new system block group and release the reserved system space, therefore resulting in a deadlock. In short, the problem is if a task B needs to allocate a new chunk after it previously allocated a new system chunk and if another task A is currently waiting for task B to complete the allocation of the new system chunk. Unfortunately this deadlock scenario introduced by the previous fix for the system chunk array exhaustion problem does not have a simple and short fix, and requires a big change to rework the chunk allocation code so that chunk btree updates are all made in the first phase of chunk allocation. And since this deadlock regression is being frequently hit on zoned filesystems and the system chunk array exhaustion problem is triggered in more extreme cases (originally observed on PowerPC with a node size of 64K when running the fallocate tests from stress-ng), revert the changes from that commit. The next patch in the series, with a subject of "btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array" does the necessary changes to fix the system chunk array exhaustion problem. Reported-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210621015922.ewgbffxuawia7liz@naota-xeon/ Fixes: eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-29 13:43:05 +00:00
if (!ret)
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
trans->chunk_bytes_reserved += bytes;
}
}
btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-13 09:12:49 +00:00
/*
* Reserve space in the system space for allocating or removing a chunk.
* The caller must be holding fs_info->chunk_mutex.
*/
void check_system_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 type)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
const u64 num_devs = get_profile_num_devs(fs_info, type);
u64 bytes;
/* num_devs device items to update and 1 chunk item to add or remove. */
bytes = btrfs_calc_metadata_size(fs_info, num_devs) +
btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
reserve_chunk_space(trans, bytes, type);
}
/*
* Reserve space in the system space, if needed, for doing a modification to the
* chunk btree.
*
* @trans: A transaction handle.
* @is_item_insertion: Indicate if the modification is for inserting a new item
* in the chunk btree or if it's for the deletion or update
* of an existing item.
*
* This is used in a context where we need to update the chunk btree outside
* block group allocation and removal, to avoid a deadlock with a concurrent
* task that is allocating a metadata or data block group and therefore needs to
* update the chunk btree while holding the chunk mutex. After the update to the
* chunk btree is done, btrfs_trans_release_chunk_metadata() should be called.
*
*/
void btrfs_reserve_chunk_metadata(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
bool is_item_insertion)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = trans->fs_info;
u64 bytes;
if (is_item_insertion)
bytes = btrfs_calc_insert_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
else
bytes = btrfs_calc_metadata_size(fs_info, 1);
mutex_lock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
reserve_chunk_space(trans, bytes, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM);
mutex_unlock(&fs_info->chunk_mutex);
}
void btrfs_put_block_group_cache(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
u64 last = 0;
while (1) {
struct inode *inode;
block_group = btrfs_lookup_first_block_group(info, last);
while (block_group) {
btrfs_wait_block_group_cache_done(block_group);
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
if (block_group->iref)
break;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
block_group = btrfs_next_block_group(block_group);
}
if (!block_group) {
if (last == 0)
break;
last = 0;
continue;
}
inode = block_group->inode;
block_group->iref = 0;
block_group->inode = NULL;
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
ASSERT(block_group->io_ctl.inode == NULL);
iput(inode);
last = block_group->start + block_group->length;
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
}
/*
* Must be called only after stopping all workers, since we could have block
* group caching kthreads running, and therefore they could race with us if we
* freed the block groups before stopping them.
*/
int btrfs_free_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
{
struct btrfs_block_group *block_group;
struct btrfs_space_info *space_info;
struct btrfs_caching_control *caching_ctl;
struct rb_node *n;
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
while (!list_empty(&info->caching_block_groups)) {
caching_ctl = list_entry(info->caching_block_groups.next,
struct btrfs_caching_control, list);
list_del(&caching_ctl->list);
btrfs_put_caching_control(caching_ctl);
}
btrfs: protect fs_info->caching_block_groups by block_group_cache_lock I got the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0+ #101 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ btrfs-cleaner/3445 is trying to acquire lock: ffff89dbec39ab48 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 but task is already holding lock: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_write+0x3d/0x70 btrfs_cache_block_group+0x2d5/0x510 find_free_extent+0xb6e/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&space_info->groups_sem){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x40/0x130 find_free_extent+0x2ed/0x12f0 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb1/0x330 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4f/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11d/0x580 btrfs_cow_block+0x10c/0x220 commit_cowonly_roots+0x47/0x2e0 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x595/0xbd0 sync_filesystem+0x74/0x90 generic_shutdown_super+0x22/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 deactivate_locked_super+0x36/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x12d/0x190 task_work_run+0x5c/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1df/0x200 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x54/0x280 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (btrfs-root-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-root-00 --> &space_info->groups_sem --> &fs_info->commit_root_sem Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(&space_info->groups_sem); lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); lock(btrfs-root-00); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by btrfs-cleaner/3445: #0: ffff89dbeaf28838 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cleaner_kthread+0x6e/0x140 #1: ffff89dbeb6c7640 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: start_transaction+0x40b/0x5c0 #2: ffff89dbeaf28a88 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 3445 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Not tainted 5.9.0+ #101 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb0 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 __lock_acquire+0x1167/0x2150 ? __bfs+0x42/0x210 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 down_read_nested+0x43/0x130 ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x170 __btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x3a/0x50 btrfs_search_slot+0x614/0x9d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 btrfs_find_root+0x35/0x1b0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x61/0x120 btrfs_get_root_ref+0x14b/0x600 find_parent_nodes+0x3e6/0x1b30 btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0xb4/0x130 btrfs_find_all_roots+0x60/0x80 btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x27/0x40 btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x3fd/0x460 btrfs_free_extent+0x42/0x100 __btrfs_mod_ref+0x1d7/0x2f0 walk_up_proc+0x11c/0x400 walk_up_tree+0xf0/0x180 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x1c7/0x780 ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x73/0x110 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xfb/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd4/0x140 ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x50/0x50 kthread+0x13a/0x150 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 while testing another lockdep fix. This happens because we're using the commit_root_sem to protect fs_info->caching_block_groups, which creates a dependency on the groups_sem -> commit_root_sem, which is problematic because we will allocate blocks while holding tree roots. Fix this by making the list itself protected by the fs_info->block_group_cache_lock. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2020-10-23 13:58:11 +00:00
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
spin_lock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
while (!list_empty(&info->unused_bgs)) {
block_group = list_first_entry(&info->unused_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
bg_list);
list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
while (!list_empty(&info->reclaim_bgs)) {
block_group = list_first_entry(&info->reclaim_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
bg_list);
list_del_init(&block_group->bg_list);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
spin_unlock(&info->unused_bgs_lock);
spin_lock(&info->zone_active_bgs_lock);
while (!list_empty(&info->zone_active_bgs)) {
block_group = list_first_entry(&info->zone_active_bgs,
struct btrfs_block_group,
active_bg_list);
list_del_init(&block_group->active_bg_list);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
}
spin_unlock(&info->zone_active_bgs_lock);
spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
while ((n = rb_last(&info->block_group_cache_tree)) != NULL) {
block_group = rb_entry(n, struct btrfs_block_group,
cache_node);
rb_erase(&block_group->cache_node,
&info->block_group_cache_tree);
RB_CLEAR_NODE(&block_group->cache_node);
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
down_write(&block_group->space_info->groups_sem);
list_del(&block_group->list);
up_write(&block_group->space_info->groups_sem);
/*
* We haven't cached this block group, which means we could
* possibly have excluded extents on this block group.
*/
if (block_group->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_NO ||
block_group->cached == BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR)
btrfs_free_excluded_extents(block_group);
btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(block_group);
ASSERT(block_group->cached != BTRFS_CACHE_STARTED);
ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->dirty_list));
ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->io_list));
ASSERT(list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
ASSERT(refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1);
btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrub When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-05 12:55:37 +00:00
ASSERT(block_group->swap_extents == 0);
btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
spin_lock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&info->block_group_cache_lock);
btrfs_release_global_block_rsv(info);
while (!list_empty(&info->space_info)) {
space_info = list_entry(info->space_info.next,
struct btrfs_space_info,
list);
/*
* Do not hide this behind enospc_debug, this is actually
* important and indicates a real bug if this happens.
*/
if (WARN_ON(space_info->bytes_pinned > 0 ||
space_info->bytes_reserved > 0 ||
space_info->bytes_may_use > 0))
btrfs_dump_space_info(info, space_info, 0, 0);
WARN_ON(space_info->reclaim_size > 0);
list_del(&space_info->list);
btrfs_sysfs_remove_space_info(space_info);
}
return 0;
}
void btrfs_freeze_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
{
atomic_inc(&cache->frozen);
}
void btrfs_unfreeze_block_group(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group)
{
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = block_group->fs_info;
struct extent_map_tree *em_tree;
struct extent_map *em;
bool cleanup;
spin_lock(&block_group->lock);
cleanup = (atomic_dec_and_test(&block_group->frozen) &&
block_group->removed);
spin_unlock(&block_group->lock);
if (cleanup) {
em_tree = &fs_info->mapping_tree;
write_lock(&em_tree->lock);
em = lookup_extent_mapping(em_tree, block_group->start,
1);
BUG_ON(!em); /* logic error, can't happen */
remove_extent_mapping(em_tree, em);
write_unlock(&em_tree->lock);
/* once for us and once for the tree */
free_extent_map(em);
free_extent_map(em);
/*
* We may have left one free space entry and other possible
* tasks trimming this block group have left 1 entry each one.
* Free them if any.
*/
__btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(block_group->free_space_ctl);
}
}
btrfs: fix race between writes to swap files and scrub When we active a swap file, at btrfs_swap_activate(), we acquire the exclusive operation lock to prevent the physical location of the swap file extents to be changed by operations such as balance and device replace/resize/remove. We also call there can_nocow_extent() which, among other things, checks if the block group of a swap file extent is currently RO, and if it is we can not use the extent, since a write into it would result in COWing the extent. However we have no protection against a scrub operation running after we activate the swap file, which can result in the swap file extents to be COWed while the scrub is running and operating on the respective block group, because scrub turns a block group into RO before it processes it and then back again to RW mode after processing it. That means an attempt to write into a swap file extent while scrub is processing the respective block group, will result in COWing the extent, changing its physical location on disk. Fix this by making sure that block groups that have extents that are used by active swap files can not be turned into RO mode, therefore making it not possible for a scrub to turn them into RO mode. When a scrub finds a block group that can not be turned to RO due to the existence of extents used by swap files, it proceeds to the next block group and logs a warning message that mentions the block group was skipped due to active swap files - this is the same approach we currently use for balance. Fixes: ed46ff3d42378 ("Btrfs: support swap files") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-02-05 12:55:37 +00:00
bool btrfs_inc_block_group_swap_extents(struct btrfs_block_group *bg)
{
bool ret = true;
spin_lock(&bg->lock);
if (bg->ro)
ret = false;
else
bg->swap_extents++;
spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
return ret;
}
void btrfs_dec_block_group_swap_extents(struct btrfs_block_group *bg, int amount)
{
spin_lock(&bg->lock);
ASSERT(!bg->ro);
ASSERT(bg->swap_extents >= amount);
bg->swap_extents -= amount;
spin_unlock(&bg->lock);
}