2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* $Id: mmu_context.h,v 1.54 2002/02/09 19:49:31 davem Exp $ */
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
|
|
|
#define __SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Derived heavily from Linus's Alpha/AXP ASN code... */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/system.h>
|
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/spitfire.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void enter_lazy_tlb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern spinlock_t ctx_alloc_lock;
|
|
|
|
|
extern unsigned long tlb_context_cache;
|
|
|
|
|
extern unsigned long mmu_context_bmap[];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void get_new_mmu_context(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
2006-02-01 02:31:06 +00:00
|
|
|
extern int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
|
|
|
extern void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-10 01:21:53 +00:00
|
|
|
extern void __tsb_context_switch(unsigned long pgd_pa,
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long tsb_reg,
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long tsb_vaddr,
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long tsb_pte,
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long tsb_descr_pa);
|
2006-02-01 02:31:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void tsb_context_switch(struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
__tsb_context_switch(__pa(mm->pgd), mm->context.tsb_reg_val,
|
|
|
|
|
mm->context.tsb_map_vaddr,
|
2006-02-10 01:21:53 +00:00
|
|
|
mm->context.tsb_map_pte,
|
|
|
|
|
__pa(&mm->context.tsb_descr));
|
2006-02-01 02:31:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2006-02-01 02:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
extern void tsb_grow(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long mm_rss, gfp_t gfp_flags);
|
|
|
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
|
|
|
extern void smp_tsb_sync(struct mm_struct *mm);
|
|
|
|
|
#else
|
|
|
|
|
#define smp_tsb_sync(__mm) do { } while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Set MMU context in the actual hardware. */
|
|
|
|
|
#define load_secondary_context(__mm) \
|
2006-02-08 06:13:05 +00:00
|
|
|
__asm__ __volatile__( \
|
|
|
|
|
"\n661: stxa %0, [%1] %2\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
" .section .sun4v_1insn_patch, \"ax\"\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
" .word 661b\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
" stxa %0, [%1] %3\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
" .previous\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
" flush %%g6\n" \
|
|
|
|
|
: /* No outputs */ \
|
|
|
|
|
: "r" (CTX_HWBITS((__mm)->context)), \
|
|
|
|
|
"r" (SECONDARY_CONTEXT), "i" (ASI_DMMU), "i" (ASI_MMU))
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void __flush_tlb_mm(unsigned long, unsigned long);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Switch the current MM context. */
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *old_mm, struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *tsk)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned long ctx_valid;
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 22:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
int cpu;
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 22:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Note: page_table_lock is used here to serialize switch_mm
|
|
|
|
|
* and activate_mm, and their calls to get_new_mmu_context.
|
|
|
|
|
* This use of page_table_lock is unrelated to its other uses.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 22:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
ctx_valid = CTX_VALID(mm->context);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid)
|
|
|
|
|
get_new_mmu_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid || (old_mm != mm)) {
|
|
|
|
|
load_secondary_context(mm);
|
2006-02-01 02:31:20 +00:00
|
|
|
tsb_context_switch(mm);
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 22:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Even if (mm == old_mm) we _must_ check
|
|
|
|
|
* the cpu_vm_mask. If we do not we could
|
|
|
|
|
* corrupt the TLB state because of how
|
|
|
|
|
* smp_flush_tlb_{page,range,mm} on sparc64
|
|
|
|
|
* and lazy tlb switches work. -DaveM
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!ctx_valid || !cpu_isset(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask)) {
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_set(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask);
|
|
|
|
|
__flush_tlb_mm(CTX_HWBITS(mm->context),
|
|
|
|
|
SECONDARY_CONTEXT);
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define deactivate_mm(tsk,mm) do { } while (0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Activate a new MM instance for the current task. */
|
|
|
|
|
static inline void activate_mm(struct mm_struct *active_mm, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
int cpu;
|
|
|
|
|
|
[SPARC64] mm: context switch ptlock
sparc64 is unique among architectures in taking the page_table_lock in
its context switch (well, cris does too, but erroneously, and it's not
yet SMP anyway).
This seems to be a private affair between switch_mm and activate_mm,
using page_table_lock as a per-mm lock, without any relation to its uses
elsewhere. That's fine, but comment it as such; and unlock sooner in
switch_mm, more like in activate_mm (preemption is disabled here).
There is a block of "if (0)"ed code in smp_flush_tlb_pending which would
have liked to rely on the page_table_lock, in switch_mm and elsewhere;
but its comment explains how dup_mmap's flush_tlb_mm defeated it. And
though that could have been changed at any time over the past few years,
now the chance vanishes as we push the page_table_lock downwards, and
perhaps split it per page table page. Just delete that block of code.
Which leaves the mysterious spin_unlock_wait(&oldmm->page_table_lock)
in kernel/fork.c copy_mm. Textual analysis (supported by Nick Piggin)
suggests that the comment was written by DaveM, and that it relates to
the defeated approach in the sparc64 smp_flush_tlb_pending. Just delete
this block too.
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-11-07 22:09:01 +00:00
|
|
|
/* Note: page_table_lock is used here to serialize switch_mm
|
|
|
|
|
* and activate_mm, and their calls to get_new_mmu_context.
|
|
|
|
|
* This use of page_table_lock is unrelated to its other uses.
|
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
if (!CTX_VALID(mm->context))
|
|
|
|
|
get_new_mmu_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
|
|
|
|
if (!cpu_isset(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask))
|
|
|
|
|
cpu_set(cpu, mm->cpu_vm_mask);
|
|
|
|
|
spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
load_secondary_context(mm);
|
|
|
|
|
__flush_tlb_mm(CTX_HWBITS(mm->context), SECONDARY_CONTEXT);
|
2006-02-01 02:31:20 +00:00
|
|
|
tsb_context_switch(mm);
|
2005-04-16 22:20:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* !(__ASSEMBLY__) */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif /* !(__SPARC64_MMU_CONTEXT_H) */
|
