amd-drm-next-5.6-2020-01-17:
amdgpu:
- Fix 32 bit harder
- Powerplay cleanups
- VCN fixes for Arcturus
- RAS fixes
- eDP/DP fixes
- SR-IOV fixes
- Re-enable S/G display for PCO/RV2
- Free stolen memory after init on gmc10
- DF hashing optimizations for Arcturus
- Properly handle runtime pm in sysfs and debugfs
- Unify more GC programming between amdgpu and amdkfd
- Golden settings updates for gfx10
- GDDR6 training fixes
- Freesync fixes
- DSC fixes
- TMDS fixes
- Renoir USB-C fixes
- DC dml updates from hw team
- Pollock support
- Mutex init regresson fix
amdkfd:
- Unify more GC programming between amdgpu and amdkfd
- Use KIQ to setup HIQ rather than using MMIO
scheduler:
- Documentation fixes
- Improve job distribution with load sharing
drm:
- DP MST fix
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117213625.4722-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com
[Why]
While handling LINK_ADDRESS reply, current code expects a peer device
can handle sideband message once the peer device type is reported as
DP_PEER_DEVICE_MST_BRANCHING. However, when the connected device is
a SST branch case, it can't handle the sideband message(MST_CAP=0 in
DPCD 00021h).
Current code will try to send LINK_ADDRESS to SST branch device and end
up with message timeout and monitor can't display normally. As the
result of that, we should take SST branch device into account.
[How]
According to DP 1.4 spec, we can use Peer_Device_Type as
DP_PEER_DEVICE_MST_BRANCHING and Message_Capability_Status as 0 to
indicate peer device as a SST-only branch device.
Fix following:
- Add the function drm_dp_mst_is_dp_mst_end_device() to decide whether a
peer device connected to a DFP is mst end device. Which also indicates
if the peer device is capable of handling message or not.
- Take SST-only branch device case into account in
drm_dp_port_set_pdt() and add a new parameter 'new_mcs'. Take sst branch
device case as the same case as DP_PEER_DEVICE_DP_LEGACY_CONV and
DP_PEER_DEVICE_SST_SINK. All original handling logics remain.
- Take SST-only branch device case into account in
drm_dp_mst_port_add_connector().
- Fix some parts in drm_dp_mst_handle_link_address_port() to have SST
branch device case into consideration.
- Fix the arguments of drm_dp_port_set_pdt() in
drm_dp_mst_handle_conn_stat().
- Have SST branch device also report
connector_status_connected when the ddps is true
in drm_dp_mst_detect_port()
- Fix the arguments of drm_dp_port_set_pdt() in
drm_dp_delayed_destroy_port()
Changes since v1:(https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11323079/)
* Squash previous patch into one patch and merge the commit message here.
* Combine the if statements mentioned in comments
Fixes: c485e2c97d ("drm/dp_mst: Refactor pdt setup/teardown, add more locking")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan@amd.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117060350.26358-2-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
If we create a rather large userptr object(e.g 1ULL << 32) we might
shift past the type-width of num_pages: (int)num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
resulting in a totally bogus sg_table, which fortunately will eventually
manifest as:
gen8_ppgtt_insert_huge:463 GEM_BUG_ON(iter->sg->length < page_size)
kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/gen8_ppgtt.c:463!
v2: more unsigned long
prefer I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE
Fixes: 5cc9ed4b9a ("drm/i915: Introduce mapping of user pages into video memory (userptr) ioctl")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117132413.1170563-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
Since commit 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy"), we
prune the engine->active.requests list prior to preemption, thus
removing the trace of the currently executing request. If that request
hangs rather than be preempted, we conclude that no active request was
on the GPU. Fortunately, this only impacts our debugging, and not our
means of hang detection or recovery.
v2: Use from to check the current iterator before continuing, and report
active as NULL if the current request is already completed.
References: 22b7a426bb ("drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117113259.3023890-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset). While here
move descriptor error reporting to the function that actually
touches that descriptor.
Note that unexpected content of the specific CT messages, that
still complies with generic CT message format, shall not trigger
disabling whole CTB, as that might just indicate new unsupported
message types.
v2: drop redundant message (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
Turns out we actually already have some companies, such as Lenovo,
shipping machines with AMOLED screens that don't allow controlling the
backlight through the usual PWM interface and only allow controlling it
through the standard EDP DPCD interface. One example of one of these
laptops is the X1 Extreme 2nd Generation.
Since we've got systems that need this turned on by default now to have
backlight controls working out of the box, let's start auto-detecting it
for systems by default based on what the VBT tells us. We do this by
changing the default value for the enable_dpcd_backlight module param
from 0 to -1.
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-6-lyude@redhat.com
For eDP panels, it appears it's expected that so long as the panel is in
DPCD control mode that the brightness value is never set to 0. Instead,
if the desired effect is to set the panel's backlight to 0 we're
expected to simply turn off the backlight through the
DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER.
We already do the latter correctly in intel_dp_aux_disable_backlight().
But, we make the mistake of writing the DPCD registers in the wrong
order when enabling the backlight in intel_dp_aux_enable_backlight()
since we currently enable the backlight through
DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER before writing the brightness level. On
the X1 Extreme 2nd Generation, this appears to have the potential of
confusing the panel in such a way that further attempts to set the
brightness don't actually change the backlight as expected and leave it
off. Presumably, this happens because the incorrect register writing
order briefly leaves the panel with DPCD mode enabled and a 0 brightness
level set.
So, reverse the order we write the DPCD registers when enabling the
panel backlight so that we write the brightness value first, and enable
the backlight second. This fix appears to be the final bit needed to get
the backlight on the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation's AMOLED screen
working.
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-4-lyude@redhat.com
Currently we always determine the initial panel brightness level by
simply reading the value from DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_MSB/LSB. This
seems wrong though, because if the panel is not currently in DPCD
control mode there's not really any reason why there would be any
brightness value programmed in the first place.
This appears to be the case on the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd
Generation, where the default value in these registers is always 0 on
boot despite the fact the panel runs at max brightness by default.
Getting the initial brightness value correct here is important as well,
since the panel on this laptop doesn't behave well if it's ever put into
DPCD control mode while the brightness level is programmed to 0.
So, let's fix this by checking what the current backlight control mode
is before reading the brightness level. If it's in DPCD control mode, we
return the programmed brightness level. Otherwise we assume 100%
brightness and return the highest possible brightness level. This also
prevents us from accidentally programming a brightness level of 0.
This is one of the many fixes that gets backlight controls working on
the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation with optional 4K AMOLED screen.
Changes since v1:
* s/DP_EDP_DISPLAY_CONTROL_REGISTER/DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_MODE_SET_REGISTER/
- Jani
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-3-lyude@redhat.com
Max backlight value for the panel was being calculated using byte
count i.e. 0xffff if 2 bytes are supported for backlight brightness
and 0xff if 1 byte is supported. However, EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT
determines the number of active control bits used for the brightness
setting. Thus, even if the panel uses 2 byte setting, it might not use
all the control bits. Thus, max backlight should be set based on the
value of EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT instead of assuming 65535 or 255.
Additionally, EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT was being updated based on the VBT
frequency which results in a different max backlight value. Thus,
setting of EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT is moved to setup phase instead of
enable so that max backlight can be calculated correctly. Only the
frequency divider is set during the enable phase using the value of
EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT.
This is based off the original patch series from Furquan Shaikh
<furquan@google.com>:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/317255/?series=62326&rev=3
Changes since original patch:
* Remove unused intel_dp variable in intel_dp_aux_setup_backlight()
* Fix checkpatch issues
* Make sure that we rewrite the pwmgen bit count whenever we bring the
panel out of D3 mode
v2 by Jani:
* rebase
* fix readb return value check
Cc: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Tested-by: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116211623.53799-2-lyude@redhat.com
Currently, we skip error capture upon forced preemption. We apply forced
preemption when there is a higher priority request that should be
running but is being blocked, and we skip inline error capture so that
the preemption request is not further delayed by a user controlled
capture -- extending the denial of service.
However, preemption reset is also used for heartbeats and regular GPU
hangs. By skipping the error capture, we remove the ability to debug GPU
hangs.
In order to capture the error without delaying the preemption request
further, we can do an out-of-line capture by removing the guilty request
from the execution queue and scheduling a worker to dump that request.
When removing a request, we need to remove the entire context and all
descendants from the execution queue, so that they do not jump past.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738
Fixes: 3a7a92aba8 ("drm/i915/execlists: Force preemption")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
In order to support out-of-line error capture, we need to remove the
active request from HW and put it to one side while a worker compresses
and stores all the details associated with that request. (As that
compression may take an arbitrary user-controlled amount of time, we
want to let the engine continue running on other workloads while the
hanging request is dumped.) Not only do we need to remove the active
request, but we also have to remove its context and all requests that
were dependent on it (both in flight, queued and future submission).
Finally once the capture is complete, we need to be able to resubmit the
request and its dependents and allow them to execute.
v2: Replace stack recursion with a simple list.
v3: Check all the parents, not just the first, when searching for a
stuck ancestor!
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/738
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
[why]
DPG is used to generate both blank and test automation test pattern.
When test automation is running the requested test pattern can be
overriden by the blank or unblank call because it is using the same
hardware.
[how]
When test pattern is requested, skip blank or unblank.
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikola Cornij <Nikola.Cornij@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Try to allocate MST payload but receive HPD short pulse with link loss
casue driver allocate payload twice. It cause monitor can't light up
successfully.
[How]
When driver receive HPD short pulse with link loss, we need to
deallocate payload then allocate payload.
Then we will not allocate payload twice with same sink.
Signed-off-by: Paul Hsieh <paul.hsieh@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Need to fix DML portability issues to enable SW unit testing around DML
[how]
Move calcs into dc include folder since multiple components reference it
Remove relative paths to external dependencies
Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
The rapid msleep operation causes the white line garbage when
DAL check flip pending status in SetVidPnSourceVisibility.
To execute this msleep will induce context switch, and longer
delay could cause worse garbage situation.
[how]
To replace msleep with mdelay.
Signed-off-by: Martin Tsai <martin.tsai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Currently if seamless boot is enabled, we will skip double buffer enable
for OTG_BLANK. However, we need the double buffer enable in order to
block global sync signals when OTG becomes blanked (for PSR). Blocking
global sync signals prevent pipe from requesting data.
[How]
Move tg_init before seamless boot check.
Signed-off-by: Alvin Lee <alvin.lee2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Currently we wait for test pattern after each pipe is programmed. For
ODM combined scenario it will cause test pattern is shown on only half
screen for 1 frame. This is not desirable.
[how]
No wait between odm pipe programming, only wait after all pipes are
programmed.
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
With different refresh rate panels, the PSR entry/exit time is
different since it is dependent on 2 frame entry time today
[How]
Make static screen num frame entry time to be calculated
such that entry time is within 30 ms instead of fixed num
frames.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
