The alleged requirement that the migration notifier has a lower priority than
perf is completely undocumented and there is no indication at all that this is
true. perf does not even handle the CPU_ONLINE notification and perf really
has nothing to do with migration.
Move the CPU_ONLINE code into the sched_activate_cpu() state callback.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160310120025.421743581@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Now that we reduced everything into single notifiers, it's simple to move them
into the hotplug state machine space.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
We can maintain the ordering of the scheduler cpu hotplug functionality nicely
in one notifer. Get rid of the maze.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Prevent the SMP scheduler related notifiers to be executed before the smp
scheduler is initialized and install them early.
This is a preparatory change for further consolidation of the hotplug notifier
maze.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
In order to enable symmetric hotplug, we must mirror the online &&
!active state of cpu-down on the cpu-up side.
However, to retain sanity, limit this state to per-cpu kthreads.
Aside from the change to set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), which allow moving
the per-cpu kthreads on, the other critical piece is the cpu selection
for pinned tasks in select_task_rq(). This avoids dropping into
select_fallback_rq().
select_fallback_rq() cannot be allowed to select !active cpus because
its used to migrate user tasks away. And we do not want to move user
tasks onto cpus that are in transition.
Requested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160301152303.GV6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Chris Metcalf reported a that sched_can_stop_tick() sometimes fails to
re-enable the tick.
His observed problem is that rq->cfs.nr_running can be 1 even though
there are multiple runnable CFS tasks. This happens in the cgroup
case, in which case cfs.nr_running is the number of runnable entities
for that level.
If there is a single runnable cgroup (which can have an arbitrary
number of runnable child entries itself) rq->cfs.nr_running will be 1.
However, looking at that function I think there's more problems with it.
It seems to assume that if there's FIFO tasks, those will run. This is
incorrect. The FIFO task can have a lower prio than an RR task, in which
case the RR task will run.
So the whole fifo_nr_running test seems misplaced, it should go after
the rr_nr_running tests. That is, only if !rr_nr_running, can we use
fifo_nr_running like this.
Reported-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Tested-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Fixes: 76d92ac305 ("sched: Migrate sched to use new tick dependency mask model")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160421160315.GK24771@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
I got a minus(very big) dl_b->total_bw during my deadline tests.
# grep dl /proc/sched_debug
dl_rq[0]:
.dl_nr_running : 0
.dl_bw->bw : 996147
.dl_bw->total_bw : -222297900
Something unusual must have happened.
After some digging, I finally noticed that when changing a deadline
task to normal(cfs), and changing it back to deadline immediately,
after it died, we will got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.
The root cause is in dl_overflow(), it has:
if (new_bw == p->dl.dl_bw)
return 0;
1) When a deadline task is changed to !deadline task, it will start
dl timer in switched_from_dl(), and retain previous deadline parameter
till the timer expires.
2) If we change it back to deadline with the same bandwidth parameter
before the timer expires, as it keeps the old bandwidth although it
is not a deadline task. dl_overflow() simply returns success without
updating the right data, and got the wrong dl_bw->total_bw.
The solution is simple, if @p is not deadline, don't return.
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460636368-1993-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Ticks can happen while the CPU is in dynticks-idle or dynticks-singletask
mode. In fact "nohz" or "dynticks" only mean that we exit the periodic
mode and we try to minimize the ticks as much as possible. The nohz
subsystem uses a confusing terminology with the internal state
"ts->tick_stopped" which is also available through its public interface
with tick_nohz_tick_stopped(). This is a misnomer as the tick is instead
reduced with the best effort rather than stopped. In the best case the
tick can indeed be actually stopped but there is no guarantee about that.
If a timer needs to fire one second later, a tick will fire while the
CPU is in nohz mode and this is a very common scenario.
Now this confusion happens to be a problem with CPU load updates:
cpu_load_update_active() doesn't handle nohz ticks correctly because it
assumes that ticks are completely stopped in nohz mode and that
cpu_load_update_active() can't be called in dynticks mode. When that
happens, the whole previous tickless load is ignored and the function
just records the load for the current tick, ignoring potentially long
idle periods behind.
In order to solve this, we could account the current load for the
previous nohz time but there is a risk that we account the load of a
task that got freshly enqueued for the whole nohz period.
So instead, lets record the dynticks load on nohz frame entry so we know
what to record in case of nohz ticks, then use this record to account
the tickless load on nohz ticks and nohz frame end.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul E . McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460555812-25375-3-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
When asymmetric packing is set in the sched_domain and target CPU is
busy, update_sd_pick_busiest() may not select the busiest runqueue.
When target CPU is busy, find_busiest_group() will ignore checks for
asym packing and may continue to load balance using the currently
selected not-the-busiest runqueue as source runqueue.
Selecting the busiest runqueue as source when the target CPU is busy,
should result in achieving much better load balance.
Also when target CPU is not busy and asymmetric packing is set in sd,
select higher CPU as source CPU for load balancing.
While doing this change, move the check to see if target CPU is busy
into check_asym_packing().
The extent of performance benefit from this change decreases with the
increasing load. However there is benefit in undercommit as well as
overcommit conditions.
1. Record per second ebizzy (32 threads) on a 64 CPU power 7 box. (5 iterations)
4.6.0-rc2
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev
ebizzy: 5223767.00 10368236.00 7946971.00 1753094.76
4.6.0-rc2+asym-changes
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
ebizzy: 8617191.00 13872356.00 11383980.00 1783400.89 +24.78%
2. Record per second ebizzy (64 threads) on a 64 CPU power 7 box. (5 iterations)
4.6.0-rc2
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev
ebizzy: 6497666.00 18399783.00 10818093.20 4051452.08
4.6.0-rc2+asym-changes
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
ebizzy: 7567365.00 19456937.00 11674063.60 4295407.48 +4.40%
3. Record per second ebizzy (128 threads) on a 64 CPU power 7 box. (5 iterations)
4.6.0-rc2
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev
ebizzy: 37073983.00 40341911.00 38776241.80 1259766.82
4.6.0-rc2+asym-changes
Testcase: Min Max Avg StdDev %Change
ebizzy: 38030399.00 41333378.00 39827404.40 1255001.86 +2.54%
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459948660-16073-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The local_clock/cpu_clock functions were changed to prevent a double
identical test with sched_clock_cpu() when HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK
is set. That resulted in one line functions.
As these functions are in all the cases one line functions and in the
hot path, it is useful to specify them as static inline in order to
give a strong hint to the compiler.
After verification, it appears the compiler does not inline them
without this hint. Change those functions to static inline.
sched_clock_cpu() is called via the inlined local_clock()/cpu_clock()
functions from sched.h. So any module code including sched.h will
reference sched_clock_cpu(). Thus it must be exported with the
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL macro.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460385514-14700-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
In case the HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK config is set, the cpu_clock() version
checks if sched_clock_stable() is not set and calls sched_clock_cpu(),
otherwise it calls sched_clock().
sched_clock_cpu() checks also if sched_clock_stable() is set and, if true,
calls sched_clock().
sched_clock() will be called in sched_clock_cpu() if sched_clock_stable() is
true.
Remove the duplicate test by directly calling sched_clock_cpu() and let the
static key act in this function instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1460385514-14700-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Due to differences in the cpufreq core's handling of runtime CPU
offline and nonboot CPUs disabling during system suspend-to-RAM,
fast frequency switching gets disabled after a suspend-to-RAM and
resume cycle on all of the nonboot CPUs.
To prevent that from happening, move the invocation of
cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from cpufreq_exit_governor() to
sugov_exit(), as the schedutil governor is the only user of fast
frequency switching today anyway.
That simply prevents cpufreq_disable_fast_switch() from being called
without invoking the ->governor callback for the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT
event (which happens during system suspend now).
Fixes: b7898fda5b (cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Add a new cpufreq scaling governor, called "schedutil", that uses
scheduler-provided CPU utilization information as input for making
its decisions.
Doing that is possible after commit 34e2c555f3 (cpufreq: Add
mechanism for registering utilization update callbacks) that
introduced cpufreq_update_util() called by the scheduler on
utilization changes (from CFS) and RT/DL task status updates.
In particular, CPU frequency scaling decisions may be based on
the the utilization data passed to cpufreq_update_util() by CFS.
The new governor is relatively simple.
The frequency selection formula used by it depends on whether or not
the utilization is frequency-invariant. In the frequency-invariant
case the new CPU frequency is given by
next_freq = 1.25 * max_freq * util / max
where util and max are the last two arguments of cpufreq_update_util().
In turn, if util is not frequency-invariant, the maximum frequency in
the above formula is replaced with the current frequency of the CPU:
next_freq = 1.25 * curr_freq * util / max
The coefficient 1.25 corresponds to the frequency tipping point at
(util / max) = 0.8.
All of the computations are carried out in the utilization update
handlers provided by the new governor. One of those handlers is
used for cpufreq policies shared between multiple CPUs and the other
one is for policies with one CPU only (and therefore it doesn't need
to use any extra synchronization means).
The governor supports fast frequency switching if that is supported
by the cpufreq driver in use and possible for the given policy.
In the fast switching case, all operations of the governor take
place in its utilization update handlers. If fast switching cannot
be used, the frequency switch operations are carried out with the
help of a work item which only calls __cpufreq_driver_target()
(under a mutex) to trigger a frequency update (to a value already
computed beforehand in one of the utilization update handlers).
Currently, the governor treats all of the RT and DL tasks as
"unknown utilization" and sets the frequency to the allowed
maximum when updated from the RT or DL sched classes. That
heavy-handed approach should be replaced with something more
subtle and specifically targeted at RT and DL tasks.
The governor shares some tunables management code with the
"ondemand" and "conservative" governors and uses some common
definitions from cpufreq_governor.h, but apart from that it
is stand-alone.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Replace the single helper for adding and removing cpufreq utilization
update hooks, cpufreq_set_update_util_data(), with a pair of helpers,
cpufreq_add_update_util_hook() and cpufreq_remove_update_util_hook(),
and modify the users of cpufreq_set_update_util_data() accordingly.
With the new helpers, the code using them doesn't need to worry
about the internals of struct update_util_data and in particular
it doesn't need to worry about populating the func field in it
properly upfront.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
A new task's util_avg is set to full utilization of a CPU (100% time
running). This accelerates a new task's utilization ramp-up, useful to
boost its execution in early time. However, it may result in
(insanely) high utilization for a transient time period when a flood
of tasks are spawned. Importantly, it violates the "fundamentally
bounded" CPU utilization, and its side effect is negative if we don't
take any measure to bound it.
This patch proposes an algorithm to address this issue. It has
two methods to approach a sensible initial util_avg:
(1) An expected (or average) util_avg based on its cfs_rq's util_avg:
util_avg = cfs_rq->util_avg / (cfs_rq->load_avg + 1) * se.load.weight
(2) A trajectory of how successive new tasks' util develops, which
gives 1/2 of the left utilization budget to a new task such that
the additional util is noticeably large (when overall util is low) or
unnoticeably small (when overall util is high enough). In the meantime,
the aggregate utilization is well bounded:
util_avg_cap = (1024 - cfs_rq->avg.util_avg) / 2^n
where n denotes the nth task.
If util_avg is larger than util_avg_cap, then the effective util is
clamped to the util_avg_cap.
Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bsegall@google.com
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: pjt@google.com
Cc: steve.muckle@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1459283456-21682-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
While testing the tracer preemptoff, I hit this strange trace:
<...>-259 0...1 0us : schedule <-worker_thread
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_note_context_switch <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_sched_qs <-rcu_note_context_switch
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : rcu_preempt_qs <-rcu_note_context_switch
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : _raw_spin_lock <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..1 0us : preempt_count_add <-_raw_spin_lock
<...>-259 0d..2 0us : do_raw_spin_lock <-_raw_spin_lock
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : deactivate_task <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_rq_clock.part.84 <-deactivate_task
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : dequeue_task_fair <-deactivate_task
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : dequeue_entity <-dequeue_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_curr <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : update_min_vruntime <-update_curr
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : cpuacct_charge <-update_curr
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : __rcu_read_lock <-cpuacct_charge
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : __rcu_read_unlock <-cpuacct_charge
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : clear_buddies <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 1us : account_entity_dequeue <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : update_min_vruntime <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : update_cfs_shares <-dequeue_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : hrtick_update <-dequeue_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : wq_worker_sleeping <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : kthread_data <-wq_worker_sleeping
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_task_fair <-__schedule
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : check_cfs_rq_runtime <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : clear_buddies <-pick_next_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : pick_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : clear_buddies <-pick_next_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 2us : set_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : put_prev_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : check_cfs_rq_runtime <-put_prev_entity
<...>-259 0d..2 3us : set_next_entity <-pick_next_task_fair
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : finish_task_switch <-__schedule
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : _raw_spin_unlock_irq <-finish_task_switch
gnome-sh-1031 0d..2 3us : do_raw_spin_unlock <-_raw_spin_unlock_irq
gnome-sh-1031 0...2 3us!: preempt_count_sub <-_raw_spin_unlock_irq
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 582us : do_raw_spin_lock <-_raw_spin_lock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : _raw_spin_unlock <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : do_raw_spin_unlock <-_raw_spin_unlock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 583us : preempt_count_sub <-_raw_spin_unlock
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 584us : _raw_spin_unlock <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 584us+: trace_preempt_on <-drm_gem_object_lookup
gnome-sh-1031 0...1 603us : <stack trace>
=> preempt_count_sub
=> _raw_spin_unlock
=> drm_gem_object_lookup
=> i915_gem_madvise_ioctl
=> drm_ioctl
=> do_vfs_ioctl
=> SyS_ioctl
=> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
As I'm tracing preemption disabled, it seemed incorrect that the trace
would go across a schedule and report not being in the scheduler.
Looking into this I discovered the problem.
schedule() calls preempt_disable() but the preempt_schedule() calls
preempt_enable_notrace(). What happened above was that the gnome-shell
task was preempted on another CPU, migrated over to the idle cpu. The
tracer stared with idle calling schedule(), which called
preempt_disable(), but then gnome-shell finished, and it enabled
preemption with preempt_enable_notrace() that does stop the trace, even
though preemption was enabled.
The purpose of the preempt_disable_notrace() in the preempt_schedule()
is to prevent function tracing from going into an infinite loop.
Because function tracing can trace the preempt_enable/disable() calls
that are traced. The problem with function tracing is:
NEED_RESCHED set
preempt_schedule()
preempt_disable()
preempt_count_inc()
function trace (before incrementing preempt count)
preempt_disable_notrace()
preempt_enable_notrace()
sees NEED_RESCHED set
preempt_schedule() (repeat)
Now by breaking out the preempt off/on tracing into their own code:
preempt_disable_check() and preempt_enable_check(), we can add these to
the preempt_schedule() code. As preemption would then be disabled, even
if they were to be traced by the function tracer, the disabled
preemption would prevent the recursion.
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160321112339.6dc78ad6@gandalf.local.home
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To force a task migration during active balancing, nr_balance_failed is set
to cache_nice_tries + 1. However nr_balance_failed is not reset. As a side
effect, the next regular load balance under the same sd, a cache hot task
might be migrated, just because nr_balance_failed count is high.
Resetting nr_balance_failed after a successful active balance ensures
that a hot task is not unreasonably migrated. This can be verified by
looking at othe number of hot task migrations reported by /proc/schedstat.
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458735884-30105-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
