In order for end users to quickly react to new issues that come up in
production, it is proving useful to leverage the printk indexing system.
This printk index enables kernel developers to use calls to printk() with
changeable ad-hoc format strings (as they always have; no change of
expectations), while enabling end users to examine format strings to
detect changes.
Since end users are using regular expressions to match messages printed
through printk(), being able to detect changes in chosen format strings
from release to release provides a useful signal to review
printk()-matching regular expressions for any necessary updates.
So that detailed FAT messages are captured by this printk index, this
patch wraps fat_msg with a macro.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style cleanups]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/8aaa2dd7995e820292bb40d2120ab69756662c65.1648688136.git.jof@thejof.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lassoff <jof@thejof.com>
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
ep_poll() first calls ep_events_available() with no lock held and checks
if ep->rdllist is empty by list_empty_careful(), which reads
rdllist->prev. Thus all accesses to it need some protection to avoid
store/load-tearing.
Note INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU() already has the annotation for both prev
and next.
Commit bf3b9f6372 ("epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket
fds.") added the first lockless ep_events_available(), and commit
c5a282e963 ("fs/epoll: reduce the scope of wq lock in epoll_wait()")
made some ep_events_available() calls lockless and added single call under
a lock, finally commit e59d3c64cb ("epoll: eliminate unnecessary lock
for zero timeout") made the last ep_events_available() lockless.
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in do_epoll_wait / do_epoll_wait
write to 0xffff88810480c7d8 of 8 bytes by task 1802 on cpu 0:
INIT_LIST_HEAD include/linux/list.h:38 [inline]
list_splice_init include/linux/list.h:492 [inline]
ep_start_scan fs/eventpoll.c:622 [inline]
ep_send_events fs/eventpoll.c:1656 [inline]
ep_poll fs/eventpoll.c:1806 [inline]
do_epoll_wait+0x4eb/0xf40 fs/eventpoll.c:2234
do_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2268 [inline]
__do_sys_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2281 [inline]
__se_sys_epoll_pwait+0x12b/0x240 fs/eventpoll.c:2275
__x64_sys_epoll_pwait+0x74/0x80 fs/eventpoll.c:2275
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x44/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
read to 0xffff88810480c7d8 of 8 bytes by task 1799 on cpu 1:
list_empty_careful include/linux/list.h:329 [inline]
ep_events_available fs/eventpoll.c:381 [inline]
ep_poll fs/eventpoll.c:1797 [inline]
do_epoll_wait+0x279/0xf40 fs/eventpoll.c:2234
do_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2268 [inline]
__do_sys_epoll_pwait fs/eventpoll.c:2281 [inline]
__se_sys_epoll_pwait+0x12b/0x240 fs/eventpoll.c:2275
__x64_sys_epoll_pwait+0x74/0x80 fs/eventpoll.c:2275
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x44/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
value changed: 0xffff88810480c7d0 -> 0xffff888103c15098
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 1 PID: 1799 Comm: syz-fuzzer Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc7-syzkaller-dirty #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322002653.33865-3-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
Fixes: e59d3c64cb ("epoll: eliminate unnecessary lock for zero timeout")
Fixes: c5a282e963 ("fs/epoll: reduce the scope of wq lock in epoll_wait()")
Fixes: bf3b9f6372 ("epoll: Add busy poll support to epoll with socket fds.")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Reported-by: syzbot+bdd6e38a1ed5ee58d8bd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>
Cc: "Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <soheil@google.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: "Sridhar Samudrala" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Fix data-races around epoll reported by KCSAN."
This series suppresses a false positive KCSAN's message and fixes a real
data-race.
This patch (of 2):
pipe_poll() runs locklessly and assigns 1 to poll_usage. Once poll_usage
is set to 1, it never changes in other places. However, concurrent writes
of a value trigger KCSAN, so let's make KCSAN happy.
BUG: KCSAN: data-race in pipe_poll / pipe_poll
write to 0xffff8880042f6678 of 4 bytes by task 174 on cpu 3:
pipe_poll (fs/pipe.c:656)
ep_item_poll.isra.0 (./include/linux/poll.h:88 fs/eventpoll.c:853)
do_epoll_wait (fs/eventpoll.c:1692 fs/eventpoll.c:1806 fs/eventpoll.c:2234)
__x64_sys_epoll_wait (fs/eventpoll.c:2246 fs/eventpoll.c:2241 fs/eventpoll.c:2241)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113)
write to 0xffff8880042f6678 of 4 bytes by task 177 on cpu 1:
pipe_poll (fs/pipe.c:656)
ep_item_poll.isra.0 (./include/linux/poll.h:88 fs/eventpoll.c:853)
do_epoll_wait (fs/eventpoll.c:1692 fs/eventpoll.c:1806 fs/eventpoll.c:2234)
__x64_sys_epoll_wait (fs/eventpoll.c:2246 fs/eventpoll.c:2241 fs/eventpoll.c:2241)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:113)
Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
CPU: 1 PID: 177 Comm: epoll_race Not tainted 5.17.0-58927-gf443e374ae13 #6
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 1.11.0-2.amzn2 04/01/2014
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322002653.33865-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322002653.33865-2-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp
Fixes: 3b844826b6 ("pipe: avoid unnecessary EPOLLET wakeups under normal loads")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@gmail.com>
Cc: "Soheil Hassas Yeganeh" <soheil@google.com>
Cc: "Sridhar Samudrala" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Clang static analysis reports this false positive
glob.c:48:32: warning: Assigned value is garbage
or undefined
char const *back_pat = NULL, *back_str = back_str;
^~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
back_str is set after back_pat and it's use is protected by the !back_pat
check. It is not necessary to initialize back_str, so remove the
initialization.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220402131546.3383578-1-trix@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Convert vmcore to use an iov_iter", v5.
For some reason several people have been sending bad patches to fix
compiler warnings in vmcore recently. Here's how it should be done.
Compile-tested only on x86. As noted in the first patch, s390 should take
this conversion a bit further, but I'm not inclined to do that work
myself.
This patch (of 3):
Instead of passing in a 'buf' and 'userbuf' argument, pass in an iov_iter.
s390 needs more work to pass the iov_iter down further, or refactor, but
I'd be more comfortable if someone who can test on s390 did that work.
It's more convenient to convert the whole of read_from_oldmem() to take an
iov_iter at the same time, so rename it to read_from_oldmem_iter() and add
a temporary read_from_oldmem() wrapper that creates an iov_iter.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220408090636.560886-1-bhe@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220408090636.560886-2-bhe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "rewrite error handling during mounting stage".
This patch (of 5):
After commit da5e7c8782 ("ocfs2: cleanup journal init and shutdown"),
journal init later than before, it makes NULL pointer access in free
routine.
Crash flow:
ocfs2_fill_super
+ ocfs2_mount_volume
| + ocfs2_dlm_init //fail & return, osb->journal is NULL.
| + ...
| + ocfs2_check_volume //no chance to init osb->journal
|
+ ...
+ ocfs2_dismount_volume
ocfs2_release_system_inodes
...
evict
...
ocfs2_clear_inode
ocfs2_checkpoint_inode
ocfs2_ci_fully_checkpointed
time_after(journal->j_trans_id, ci->ci_last_trans)
+ journal is empty, crash!
For fixing, there are three solutions:
1> Partly revert commit da5e7c8782
For avoiding kernel crash, this make sense for us. We only
concerned whether there has any non-system inode access before dlm
init. The answer is NO. And all journal replay/recovery handling
happen after dlm & journal init done. So this method is not graceful
but workable.
2> Add osb->journal check in free inode routine (eg ocfs2_clear_inode)
The fix code is special for mounting phase, but it will continue
working after mounting stage. In another word, this method adds
useless code in normal inode free flow.
3> Do directly free inode in mounting phase
This method is brutal/complex and may introduce unsafe code,
currently maintainer didn't like.
At last, we chose method <1> and did partly reverted job. We reverted
journal init codes, and kept cleanup codes flow.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220424130952.2436-1-heming.zhao@suse.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220424130952.2436-2-heming.zhao@suse.com
Fixes: da5e7c8782 ("ocfs2: cleanup journal init and shutdown")
Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Old bash version don't support associative array variables. Avoid to use
associative array variables to avoid error.
Without this, old bash version will report error as fellowing
[ 15.954042] Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash
[ 15.955252] CPU: 1 PID: 167 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.18.0-rc1-00208-gb7d075db2fd5 #4
[ 15.956472] Hardware name: Hobot J5 Virtual development board (DT)
[ 15.957856] Call trace:
./scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh: line 128: ,dump_backtrace: syntax error: operand expected (error token is ",dump_backtrace")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220409180331.24047-1-schspa@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Schspa Shi <schspa@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Pull ceph client fixes from Ilya Dryomov:
"A fix for a NULL dereference that turns out to be easily triggerable
by fsync (marked for stable) and a false positive WARN and snap_rwsem
locking fixups"
* tag 'ceph-for-5.18-rc5' of https://github.com/ceph/ceph-client:
ceph: fix possible NULL pointer dereference for req->r_session
ceph: remove incorrect session state check
ceph: get snap_rwsem read lock in handle_cap_export for ceph_add_cap
libceph: disambiguate cluster/pool full log message
This patch series adds a memory.reclaim proactive reclaim interface.
The rationale behind the interface and how it works are in the first
patch.
This patch (of 4):
Introduce a memcg interface to trigger memory reclaim on a memory cgroup.
Use case: Proactive Reclaim
---------------------------
A userspace proactive reclaimer can continuously probe the memcg to
reclaim a small amount of memory. This gives more accurate and up-to-date
workingset estimation as the LRUs are continuously sorted and can
potentially provide more deterministic memory overcommit behavior. The
memory overcommit controller can provide more proactive response to the
changing behavior of the running applications instead of being reactive.
A userspace reclaimer's purpose in this case is not a complete replacement
for kswapd or direct reclaim, it is to proactively identify memory savings
opportunities and reclaim some amount of cold pages set by the policy to
free up the memory for more demanding jobs or scheduling new jobs.
A user space proactive reclaimer is used in Google data centers.
Additionally, Meta's TMO paper recently referenced a very similar
interface used for user space proactive reclaim:
https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3503222.3507731
Benefits of a user space reclaimer:
-----------------------------------
1) More flexible on who should be charged for the cpu of the memory
reclaim. For proactive reclaim, it makes more sense to be centralized.
2) More flexible on dedicating the resources (like cpu). The memory
overcommit controller can balance the cost between the cpu usage and
the memory reclaimed.
3) Provides a way to the applications to keep their LRUs sorted, so,
under memory pressure better reclaim candidates are selected. This
also gives more accurate and uptodate notion of working set for an
application.
Why memory.high is not enough?
------------------------------
- memory.high can be used to trigger reclaim in a memcg and can
potentially be used for proactive reclaim. However there is a big
downside in using memory.high. It can potentially introduce high
reclaim stalls in the target application as the allocations from the
processes or the threads of the application can hit the temporary
memory.high limit.
- Userspace proactive reclaimers usually use feedback loops to decide
how much memory to proactively reclaim from a workload. The metrics
used for this are usually either refaults or PSI, and these metrics will
become messy if the application gets throttled by hitting the high
limit.
- memory.high is a stateful interface, if the userspace proactive
reclaimer crashes for any reason while triggering reclaim it can leave
the application in a bad state.
- If a workload is rapidly expanding, setting memory.high to proactively
reclaim memory can result in actually reclaiming more memory than
intended.
The benefits of such interface and shortcomings of existing interface were
further discussed in this RFC thread:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/5df21376-7dd1-bf81-8414-32a73cea45dd@google.com/
Interface:
----------
Introducing a very simple memcg interface 'echo 10M > memory.reclaim' to
trigger reclaim in the target memory cgroup.
The interface is introduced as a nested-keyed file to allow for future
optional arguments to be easily added to configure the behavior of
reclaim.
Possible Extensions:
--------------------
- This interface can be extended with an additional parameter or flags
to allow specifying one or more types of memory to reclaim from (e.g.
file, anon, ..).
- The interface can also be extended with a node mask to reclaim from
specific nodes. This has use cases for reclaim-based demotion in memory
tiering systens.
- A similar per-node interface can also be added to support proactive
reclaim and reclaim-based demotion in systems without memcg.
- Add a timeout parameter to make it easier for user space to call the
interface without worrying about being blocked for an undefined amount
of time.
For now, let's keep things simple by adding the basic functionality.
[yosryahmed@google.com: worked on versions v2 onwards, refreshed to
current master, updated commit message based on recent
discussions and use cases]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425190040.2475377-1-yosryahmed@google.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425190040.2475377-2-yosryahmed@google.com
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Co-developed-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Cc: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michal Koutn" <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Today it's only possible to write back as a page, idle, or huge. A user
might want to writeback pages which are huge and idle first as these idle
pages do not require decompression and make a good first pass for
writeback.
Idle writeback specifically has the advantage that a refault is unlikely
given that the page has been swapped for some amount of time without being
refaulted.
Huge writeback has the advantage that you're guaranteed to get the maximum
benefit from a single page writeback, that is, you're reclaiming one full
page of memory. Pages which are compressed in zram being written back
result in some benefit which is always less than a page size because of
the fact that it was compressed.
The primary use of this is for minimizing refaults in situations where the
device has to be sensitive to storage endurance. On ChromeOS we have
devices with slow eMMC and repeated writes and refaults can negatively
affect performance and endurance.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220322215821.1196994-1-bgeffon@google.com
Signed-off-by: Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
...........
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt16-yocto-preempt-rt #22
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009),
BIOS rel-1.15.0-0-g2dd4b9b3f840-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c
dump_stack+0x10/0x12
__might_resched.cold+0x13b/0x173
rt_spin_lock+0x5b/0xf0
___cache_free+0xa5/0x180
qlist_free_all+0x7a/0x160
per_cpu_remove_cache+0x5f/0x70
smp_call_function_many_cond+0x4c4/0x4f0
on_each_cpu_cond_mask+0x49/0xc0
kasan_quarantine_remove_cache+0x54/0xf0
kasan_cache_shrink+0x9/0x10
kmem_cache_shrink+0x13/0x20
acpi_os_purge_cache+0xe/0x20
acpi_purge_cached_objects+0x21/0x6d
acpi_initialize_objects+0x15/0x3b
acpi_init+0x130/0x5ba
do_one_initcall+0xe5/0x5b0
kernel_init_freeable+0x34f/0x3ad
kernel_init+0x1e/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
When the kmem_cache_shrink() was called, the IPI was triggered, the
___cache_free() is called in IPI interrupt context, the local-lock or
spin-lock will be acquired. On PREEMPT_RT kernel, these locks are
replaced with sleepbale rt-spinlock, so the above problem is triggered.
Fix it by moving the qlist_free_allfrom() from IPI interrupt context to
task context when PREEMPT_RT is enabled.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: reduce ifdeffery]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401134649.2222485-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hugepages can be specified to pernode since "hugetlbfs: extend the
definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation", but the
following problem is observed.
Confusing behavior is observed when both 1G and 2M hugepage is set
after "numa=off".
cmdline hugepage settings:
hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:3,1:3
hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:1024,1:1024
results:
HugeTLB registered 1.00 GiB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages
HugeTLB registered 2.00 MiB page size, pre-allocated 1024 pages
Furthermore, confusing behavior can be also observed when an invalid node
behind a valid node. To fix this, never allocate any typical hugepage
when an invalid parameter is received.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-3-liupeng256@huawei.com
Fixes: b5389086ad ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "hugetlb: Fix some incorrect behavior", v3.
This series fix three bugs of hugetlb:
1) Invalid use of nr_online_nodes;
2) Inconsistency between 1G hugepage and 2M hugepage;
3) Useless information in dmesg.
This patch (of 4):
Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In this
case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node. Also, a
valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous.
For sparse/discontiguous nodes, the current code may treat a valid node
as invalid, and will fail to allocate all hugepages on a valid node that
"nid >= nr_online_nodes".
As David suggested:
if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes)
goto invalid;
Just imagine node 0 and node 2 are online, and node 1 is offline.
Assuming that "node < 2" is valid is wrong.
Recheck all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by
one.
[liupeng256@huawei.com: v4]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-1-liupeng256@huawei.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-2-liupeng256@huawei.com
Fixes: 4178158ef8 ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work")
Fixes: b5389086ad ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation")
Fixes: e79ce98323 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter")
Fixes: f9317f77a6 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings")
Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
