Normal reset and initial CPU reset do not clear all registers. Add a
test that those registers are NOT changed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We should not only test the oneregs or the get_(x)regs interfaces but
also the sync_regs. Those are usually the canonical place for register
content.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
The guest crashes very early due to changes in the control registers
used by dynamic address translation. Let us use different registers
that will not crash the guest.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
We leave some printf's because they inform the user the test is being
skipped. QUIET should not disable those. We also leave the printf's
used for help text.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Local IRQs are reset by a normal cpu reset. The initial cpu reset and
the clear cpu reset, as superset of the normal reset, both clear the
IRQs too.
Let's inject an interrupt to a vCPU before calling a reset and see if
it is gone after the reset.
We choose to inject only an emergency interrupt at this point and can
extend the test to other types of IRQs later.
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
[minor fixups]
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200131100205.74720-7-frankja@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
similar to commit 2c57da356800 ("selftests: kvm: fix sync_regs_test with
newer gccs") and commit 204c91eff7 ("KVM: selftests: do not blindly
clobber registers in guest asm") we better do not rely on gcc leaving
r11 untouched. We can write the simple ucall inline and have the guest
code completely as small assembler function.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
The test is an adaption of the same test for x86. Note that there
are some differences in the way how s390x deals with the kvm_valid_regs
in struct kvm_run, so some of the tests had to be removed. Also this
test is not using the ucall() interface on s390x yet (which would need
some work to be usable on s390x), so it simply drops out of the VM with
a diag 0x501 breakpoint instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-8-thuth@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
