intel_get_load_detect_pipe() needs to set uapi active,
uapi enable is set by the call to drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(),
so we can remove it.
intel_pipe_config_compare() needs to look at hw state, but I didn't
change spatch to look at it. It's easy enough to do manually.
intel_atomic_check() definitely needs to check for uapi enable,
otherwise intel_modeset_pipe_config cannot copy uapi state to hw.
Changes since v1:
- Actually set uapi.active in get_load_detect_pipe().
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-3-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Vanshidhar Konda asked for the simplest test "to verify that the kernel
can submit and hardware can execute batch buffers on all the command
streamers in parallel." We have a number of tests in userspace that
submit load to each engine and verify that it is present, but strictly
we have no selftest to prove that the kernel can _simultaneously_
execute on all known engines. (We have tests to demonstrate that we can
submit to HW in parallel, but we don't insist that they execute in
parallel.)
v2: Improve the igt_spinner support for older gen.
Suggested-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vanshidhar Konda <vanshidhar.r.konda@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191101101528.10553-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Currently configurations can be generated where IOMMU_SUPPORT is
disabled but IOMMU_IOVA is built as a module and DRM_TEGRA as built-in.
In such a case, the symbols guarded by IOMMU_IOVA will not be available
when linking the Tegra DRM driver and cause a linking failure.
Simplify this by unconditionally selecting IOMMU_IOVA, which makes sure
that it will be forced to =y if DRM_TEGRA=y. Technically we can now get
IOMMU_IOVA code built-in even if we don't use it (Tegra DRM only uses it
when IOMMU_SUPPORT is also enabled), but such configuration are of a
mostly academic nature. In all practical configurations we want IOMMU
support anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Currently configurations can be generated where IOMMU_SUPPORT is
disabled but IOMMU_IOVA is built as a module and HOST1X as built-in. In
such a case, the symbols guarded by IOMMU_IOVA will not be available
when linking the host1x driver and cause a linking failure.
Simplify this by unconditionally selecting IOMMU_IOVA, which makes sure
that it will be forced to =y if HOST1X=y. Technically we can now get
IOMMU_IOVA code built-in even if we don't use it (host1x only uses it
when IOMMU_SUPPORT is also enabled), but such configuration are of a
mostly academic nature. In all practical configurations we want IOMMU
support anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Intended for upstream testing so that we can still exercise the LMEM
plumbing and !i915_ggtt_has_aperture paths. Smoke tested on Skull Canyon
device. This works by allocating an intel_memory_region for a reserved
portion of system memory, which we treat like LMEM. For the LMEMBAR we
steal the aperture and 1:1 it map to the stolen region.
To enable simply set the i915 modparam fake_lmem_start= on the kernel
cmdline with the start of reserved region(see memmap=). The size of the
region we can use is determined by the size of the mappable aperture, so
the size of reserved region should be >= mappable_end. For now we only
enable for the selftests. Depends on CONFIG_DRM_I915_UNSTABLE being
enabled.
eg. memmap=2G$16G i915.fake_lmem_start=0x400000000
v2: make fake_lmem_start an i915 modparam
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191030173320.8850-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
Pull RCU and LKMM changes from Paul E. McKenney:
- Documentation updates.
- Miscellaneous fixes.
- Dynamic tick (nohz) updates, perhaps most notably changes to
force the tick on when needed due to lengthy in-kernel execution
on CPUs on which RCU is waiting.
- Replace rcu_swap_protected() with rcu_prepace_pointer().
- Torture-test updates.
- Linux-kernel memory consistency model updates.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
A final attempt at enabling sse2 for GCC users.
Orininally attempted in:
commit 1011745073 ("drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")
Reverted due to "reported instability" in:
commit 193392ed9f ("Revert "drm/amd/display: add -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines"")
Re-added just for Clang in:
commit 0f0727d971 ("drm/amd/display: readd -msse2 to prevent Clang from emitting libcalls to undefined SW FP routines")
The original report didn't have enough information to know if the GPF
was due to misalignment, but I suspect that it was. (The missing
information was the disassembly of the function at the bottom of the
trace, to see if the instruction pointer pointed to an instruction with
16B alignment memory operand requirements. The stack trace does show
the stack was only 8B but not 16B aligned though, which makes this a
strong possibility).
Now that the stack misalignment issue has been fixed for users of GCC
7.1+, reattempt adding -msse2. This matches Clang.
It will likely never be safe to enable this for pre-GCC 7.1 AND use a
16B aligned stack in these translation units.
This is only a functional change for GCC 7.1+ users, and should be boot
tested.
Link: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109487
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
GCC earlier than 7.1 errors when compiling code that makes use of
`double`s and sets a stack alignment outside of the range of [2^4-2^12]:
$ cat foo.c
double foo(double x, double y) {
return x + y;
}
$ gcc-4.9 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 foo.c
error: -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 is not between 4 and 12
This is likely why the AMDGPU driver was ever compiled with a different
stack alignment (and thus different ABI) than the rest of the x86
kernel. The kernel uses 8B stack alignment, while the driver was using
16B stack alignment in a few places.
Since GCC 7.1+ doesn't error, fix the ABI mismatch for users of newer
versions of GCC.
There was discussion about whether to mark the driver broken or not for
users of GCC earlier than 7.1, but since the driver currently is
working, don't explicitly break the driver for them here.
Relying on differing stack alignment is unspecified behavior, and
brittle, and may break in the future.
This patch is no functional change for GCC users earlier than 7.1. It's
been compile tested on GCC 4.9 and 8.3 to check the correct flags. It
should be boot tested when built with GCC 7.1+.
-mincoming-stack-boundary= or -mstackrealign may help keep this code
building for pre-GCC 7.1 users.
The version check for GCC is broken into two conditionals, both because
cc-ifversion is currently GCC specific, and it simplifies a subsequent
patch.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
The x86 kernel is compiled with an 8B stack alignment via
`-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3` for GCC since 3.6-rc1 via
commit d9b0cde91c ("x86-64, gcc: Use -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 if supported")
or `-mstack-alignment=8` for Clang. Parts of the AMDGPU driver are
compiled with 16B stack alignment.
Generally, the stack alignment is part of the ABI. Linking together two
different translation units with differing stack alignment is dangerous,
particularly when the translation unit with the smaller stack alignment
makes calls into the translation unit with the larger stack alignment.
While 8B aligned stacks are sometimes also 16B aligned, they are not
always.
Multiple users have reported General Protection Faults (GPF) when using
the AMDGPU driver compiled with Clang. Clang is placing objects in stack
slots assuming the stack is 16B aligned, and selecting instructions that
require 16B aligned memory operands.
At runtime, syscall handlers with 8B aligned stack call into code that
assumes 16B stack alignment. When the stack is a multiple of 8B but not
16B, these instructions result in a GPF.
Remove the code that added compatibility between the differing compiler
flags, as it will result in runtime GPFs when built with Clang. Cleanups
for GCC will be sent in later patches in the series.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/735
Debugged-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@amd.com>
Reported-by: Yuxuan Shui <yshuiv7@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
During kexec some adapters hit an EEH since they are not properly
shut down in the radeon_pci_shutdown() function. Adding
radeon_suspend_kms() fixes this issue.
Enabled only on PPC because this patch causes issues on some other
boards.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Mahlkuch <kmahlkuc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
This patch is for fixing Navi14 HDMI display pink screen issue.
[How]
Call stream->link->link_enc->funcs->setup twice. This is setting
the DIG_MODE to the correct value after having been overridden by
the call to transmitter control.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
i2c_read is called to differentiate passive DP->HDMI and DP->DVI-D dongles
The call is expected to fail in DVI-D case but pass in HDMI case
Some HDMI dongles have a chance to fail as well, causing misdetection as DVI-D
[HOW]
Retry i2c_read to ensure failed result is valid
Signed-off-by: Michael Strauss <michael.strauss@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
A display that supports DRR can never really be considered
"synchronized" with any other display because we can dynamically
enable DRR (i.e. without modeset). this will cause their
relative CRTC positions to drift and lose sync. this will disrupt
features such as MCLK switching that assume and depend on
their permanent alignment (that can only change with modeset)
[how]
check for ignore_msa in stream when considered synchronizability
this ignore_msa is basically actually implemented as "supports drr"
Signed-off-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Yongqiang Sun <yongqiang.sun@amd.com>
Acked-by: Anthony Koo <Anthony.Koo@amd.com>
Acked-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Problem:
When run_job fails and HW fence returned is NULL we still signal
the s_fence to avoid hangs but the user has no way of knowing if
the actual HW job was ran and finished.
Fix:
Allow .run_job implementations to return ERR_PTR in the fence pointer
returned and then set this error for s_fence->finished fence so whoever
wait on this fence can inspect the signaled fence for an error.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
DWB (Display Writeback) flag needs to be enabled as 1, or system
will throw out a few warnings when creating dcn20 resource pool.
Also, Navi14's dwb setting needs to match Navi10's,
which has already been set to 1.
[How]
Change value of num_dwb from 0 to 1.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
