[Why]
Under some hardware initialization sequences the fb base/fb offset
provided can be zero or hardwareinit can happen too late.
We want to ensure that we always have the correct fb_base/fb_offset
when performing DMCUB hardware initialization so we can do DMCUB
command table offloading during first dc hardware init.
[How]
Read from the DCN registers. VBIOS already filled these in for us.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Wesley Chalmers <Wesley.Chalmers@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
The DP 1.4a Spec requires that training pattern only under certain
specific conditions. Currently driver will re-send
training pattern every time voltage swing value changes,
but that should not be the case.
[How]
Do not re-send training pattern every time VS values
are different. Only send it on the first iteration.
Signed-off-by: Sung Lee <sung.lee@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <Tony.Cheng@amd.com>
Acked-by: Abdoulaye Berthe <Abdoulaye.Berthe@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
On video test pattern request we need to update MSA and VSC so
it will match the requested test pattern dynamic range field.
[how]
Update dynamic range field in MSA and disable VSC as updating VSC
info packet is complicated and not required for test pattern purpose.
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikola Cornij <Nikola.Cornij@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bhawanpreet Lakha <Bhawanpreet.Lakha@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Allocate fences for each entity and remove ctx->fences reference as
fences should be bound to amdgpu_ctx_entity instead amdgpu_ctx.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
In GDDR6 BIST training, a certain mount of bottom VRAM will be encroached by
UMC, that causes problems(like GTT corrupted and page fault observed).
[how]
Saving the content of this bottom VRAM to system memory before training, and
restoring it after training to avoid VRAM corruption.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Tianci.Yin <tianci.yin@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
To avoid calling RAS related functions when RAS feature isn't
supported in hardware. Change to check supported features, instead
of checking asic type.
v2: reuse amdgpu_ras_is_supported function, instead of introducing
a new flag for hardware ras feature.
Signed-off-by: Dennis Li <Dennis.Li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
PM4 packet size for flush message was oversized.
[How]
Packet size adjusted to allocate flush + fence packets.
Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
intel_prepare_plane_fb() bails early if there is no fb (or rather
no obj, which is the same thing). intel_cleanup_plane_fb() does not.
This means the steps performed by intel_cleanup_plane_fb() aren't
balanced with with what was done intel_prepare_plane_fb() if there
is no fb for the plane. These hooks get called for every plane in
the state regardless of whether they have an fb or not.
Add a matching null obj check to intel_cleanup_plane_fb() to restore
the balance.
Note that intel_cleanup_plane_fb() has sufficient protections
already in place that the imbalance doesn't cause any real problems.
But having things be in balance seems nicer anyway, and might help
avoid some surprises in the future.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110183228.8199-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Switch over to using explicit old/new planes states instead of
digging the old state out via plane->state. The main issue is that
plane->state will point to the uapi state which we generally don't
even want to look at.
Also it sets a bad example as using plane->state during commit_tail()
would be a bug. Here we're still holding the modeset locks so it's
actually safe, but best not give people bad ideas.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110183228.8199-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
If we encounter a hang on a virtual engine, as we process the hang the
request may already have been moved back to the virtual engine (we are
processing the hang on the physical engine). We need to reclaim the
request from the virtual engine so that the locking is consistent and
local to the real engine on which we will hold the request for error
state capturing.
v2: Pull the reclamation into execlists_hold() and assert that cannot be
called from outside of the reset (i.e. with the tasklet disabled).
v3: Added selftest
v4: Drop the reference owned by the virtual engine
Fixes: 748317386a ("drm/i915/execlists: Offline error capture")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_balancer/hang
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thanks to preempt-to-busy, we leave the request on the HW as we submit
the preemption request. This means that the request may complete at any
moment as we process HW events, and in particular the request may be
retired as we are planning to capture it for a preemption timeout.
Be more careful while obtaining the request to capture after a
preemption timeout, and check to see if it completed before we were able
to put it on the on-hold list. If we do see it did complete just before
we capture the request, proclaim the preemption-timeout a false positive
and pardon the reset as we should hit an arbitration point momentarily
and so be able to process the preemption.
Note that even after we move the request to be on hold it may be retired
(as the reset to stop the HW comes after), so we do require to hold our
own reference as we work on the request for capture (and all of the
peeking at state within the request needs to be carefully protected).
Fixes: 32ff621fd7 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
As we move the ttm_bo_individualize_resv() upwards, we need flush the
copied fence too. Otherwise the driver keeps waiting for fence.
run&Kill kfdtest, then perf top.
25.53% [ttm] [k] ttm_bo_delayed_delete
24.29% [kernel] [k] dma_resv_test_signaled_rcu
19.72% [kernel] [k] ww_mutex_lock
Fix: 378e2d5b("drm/ttm: fix ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue once more")
Signed-off-by: xinhui pan <xinhui.pan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/72339/
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Despite the fact that the VBT appears to have a field for specifying
that a system is equipped with a panel that supports standard VESA
backlight controls over the DP AUX channel, so far every system we've
spotted DPCD backlight control support on doesn't actually set this
field correctly and all have it set to INTEL_BACKLIGHT_DISPLAY_DDI.
While we don't know the exact reason for this VBT misuse, talking with
some vendors indicated that there's a good number of laptop panels out
there that supposedly support both PWM backlight controls and DPCD
backlight controls as a workaround until Intel supports DPCD backlight
controls across platforms universally. This being said, the X1 Extreme
2nd Gen that I have here (note that Lenovo is not the hardware vendor
that informed us of this) PWM backlight controls are advertised, but
only DPCD controls actually function. I'm going to make an educated
guess here and say that on systems like this one, it's likely that PWM
backlight controls might have been intended to work but were never
really tested by QA.
Since we really need backlights to work without any extra module
parameters, let's take the risk here and rely on the standard DPCD caps
to tell us whether AUX backlight controls are supported or not. We still
check the VBT, just so we can print a debugging message on systems that
advertise DPCD backlight support on the panel but not in the VBT.
Changes since v3:
* Print a debugging message if we enable DPCD backlight control on a
device which doesn't report DPCD backlight controls in it's VBT,
instead of warning on custom panel backlight interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112376
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Perry Yuan <pyuan@redhat.com>
Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117232155.135579-1-lyude@redhat.com
With the introduction of per-FD address space, the same BO can be mapped
in different address space if the BO is globally visible (GEM_FLINK)
and opened in different context or if the dmabuf is self-imported. The
current implementation does not take case into account, and attaches the
mapping directly to the panfrost_gem_object.
Let's create a panfrost_gem_mapping struct and allow multiple mappings
per BO.
The mappings are refcounted which helps solve another problem where
mappings were torn down (GEM handle closed by userspace) while GPU
jobs accessing those BOs were still in-flight. Jobs now keep a
reference on the mappings they use.
v2 (robh):
- Minor review comment clean-ups from Steven
- Use list_is_singular helper
- Just WARN if we add a mapping when madvise state is not WILLNEED.
With that, drop the use of object_name_lock.
v3 (robh):
- Revert returning list iterator in panfrost_gem_mapping_get()
Fixes: a5efb4c9a5 ("drm/panfrost: Restructure the GEM object creation")
Fixes: 7282f7645d ("drm/panfrost: Implement per FD address spaces")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116021554.15090-1-robh@kernel.org
Explicit management of the GPU's core stacks is only necessary in the
case of a broken integration with the PDC. Since there are no known
platforms which have such a broken integration let's remove the explicit
control from the driver since this apparently causes problems on other
platforms and will have a small performance penality.
The out of tree mali_kbase driver contains this text regarding
controlling the core stack (CONFIGMALI_CORESTACK):
Enabling this feature on supported GPUs will let the driver powering
on/off the GPU core stack independently without involving the Power
Domain Controller. This should only be enabled on platforms which
integration of the PDC to the Mali GPU is known to be problematic.
This feature is currently only supported on t-Six and t-HEx GPUs.
If unsure, say N.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200109133104.11661-1-steven.price@arm.com
