It will cause error when alloc memory larger than 128KB in
amdgpu_bo_create->kzalloc. So it needs to switch kzalloc to kvzalloc.
Call Trace:
alloc_pages_current+0x6a/0xe0
kmalloc_order+0x32/0xb0
kmalloc_order_trace+0x1e/0x80
__kmalloc+0x249/0x2d0
amdgpu_bo_create+0x102/0x500 [amdgpu]
? xas_create+0x264/0x3e0
amdgpu_bo_create_vm+0x32/0x60 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_vm_pt_create+0xf5/0x260 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_vm_init+0x1fd/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
Signed-off-by: Changfeng <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.
- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
- Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
- Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
- Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
- If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
- In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
[Why]
To support a new visual confirm mode: swizzle to show the specific
color at the screen border according to different surface swizzle mode.
Currently we only support the Linear mode with red color.
Signed-off-by: Po-Ting Chen <robin.chen@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
- Commit from userspace could cause link stream to disable and hdcp
auth to reset when the HDCP has already been enabled at the moment.
CP should fall back to DESIRED from ENABLED in such cases.
- This change was previously reverted due to a regression caused, which
has now been cleared.
[HOW]
In hdcp display removal, change CP to DESIRED if at the moment CP
is ENABLED before the auth reset and removal of linked list element.
Signed-off-by: Dingchen (David) Zhang <dingchen.zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Found a use case (IPKVM) that DP-VGA active dongle does
not return any EDID and the mentioned commit broke it.
[How]
This reverts "Disconnect non-DP with no EDID"
Signed-off-by: Roy Chan <roy.chan@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Park <Chris.Park@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why & How]
Add debugfs entry to force dsc decoding at PCON when DSC capable
external RX is connected. In such case, it is free to test DSC
decoding at external RX or at PCON.
Signed-off-by: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
When calculating recout width for an MPO plane on a mode that's using
ODM combine, driver can calculate a negative value, resulting in a
crash.
[How]
For negative widths, use zero such that validation will prune the
configuration correctly and disallow MPO.
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Krunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
Rearranging pipes with multiple displays and multiple planes cannot be
done atomically and requires a much improved sequence to deal with it.
[How]
To workaround such issues, prefer avoid pipe-split policy for
multidisplay scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Krunoslav Kovac <Krunoslav.Kovac@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
When OS overrides training link training parameters
for MST device to SST mode, MST resources are not
released and leak of the resource may result crash and
incorrect MST discovery during following hot plugs.
[how]
Retaining sink object to be reused by SST link and
releasing MST resources.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Stempen <vladimir.stempen@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
We update scaling settings when scaling mode has been changed.
However when changing mode from native resolution the scaling mode previously
set gets ignored.
[How]
Perform scaling settings update on modeset.
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[WHY]
Currently there is no way to visually identify if there is one or more
layers presented fullscreen on the display
[HOW]
Add new visual confirm colors in get_surface_visual_confirm_color for
planes with layer_index > 0
Signed-off-by: Evgenii Krasnikov <Evgenii.Krasnikov@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why + How]
Visual confirm has no asic-specific logic,
so we can refactor and unify these functions
that are currently spread out across multiple
dcn files.
Add a new hw sequencer interface update_visual_confirm_color,
and a new mpc function pointer set_bg_color.
This will allow visual confirm to updated independently
of MPCC blending updates.
v2: squash in DCN3.1 fixes
Signed-off-by: Wyatt Wood <wyatt.wood@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
DSCCLK validation is not necessary because DSCCLK is derrived from
DISPCLK, therefore if DISPCLK validation passes, DSCCLK is valid, too.
Doing DSCLK validation in addition to DISPCLK leads to modes being
wrongly rejected when DSCCLK was incorrectly set outside of DML.
[how]
Remove DSCCLK validation because it's implicitly validated under DISPCLK
Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Some DPRX will issue CP_IRQ when user disconnects a display
that has been authenticated.
Since display is being disconnecting dpcd read will fail.
This will cause us to attempt HDCP retry on disconnection.
We are adding a 100ms delay before retry.
So we will only start retry if within 100ms there is no disconnection call
to HDCP module.
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Updating PSR interfaces to allow PSR enablement
per eDP panel.
[how]
- Copying PSR command structures to DC
- Changing function interfaces to pass panel instance
- Communicating with DMUB per link instead of assuming
to use a single one
-Iterating through all PSR capable panels when enabling/disabling
all
Signed-off-by: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
During DCC on/off, stutter period is calculated before DCC has fully transitioned.
This results in incorrect stutter period calculation.
[How]
Trigger a full update when DCC changes between on/off.
Signed-off-by: Jake Wang <haonan.wang2@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Aric Cyr <Aric.Cyr@amd.com>
Acked-by: Stylon Wang <stylon.wang@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Kernel test robot throws warning ->
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu13/yellow_carp_ppt.c:483:2:
warning: variable 'member_type' is used uninitialized whenever switch
default is taken [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
default:
^~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu13/yellow_carp_ppt.c:487:47:
note: uninitialized use occurs here
return yellow_carp_get_smu_metrics_data(smu, member_type, value);
^~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../pm/swsmu/smu13/yellow_carp_ppt.c:465:2:
note: variable 'member_type' is declared here
MetricsMember_t member_type;
^
1 warning generated.
Fix this warning by return errno when the clk type is unsupported.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiaomeng Hou <Xiaomeng.Hou@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Create shadow BOs only for no-compute VM context and only for dGPU.
The existing if-condition would create shadow bo for compute context
on dGPU which not what we wanted.
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
