SDVOB may be multiplexed with HDMIB. If it's not SDVOB, the same i2c
adapter may be used for HDMIB, with the adjusted config (i.e. with GPIO
bit-banging instead of gmbus). Restore i2c adapter config before error
return from intel_sdvo_init(), letting HDMIB enjoy the joys of gmbus.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
commit 63abf3edaf
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed Dec 8 16:48:21 2010 +0000
drm/i915/sdvo: Only use the SDVO pin if it is in the valid range
added a default fallback if BIOS provides an invalid pin mapping, but
failed to force GPIO bit-banging on it. Finish the job, and also clean up
the function a bit. With bit-banging, setting the gmbus speed has no
effect, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
[danvet: Extend comment about gmbus in the code a bit.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The cdclk frequency is not always the same, so the value here should
be adjusted to match it.
Version 2: call intel_ddi_get_cdclk_freq instead of reading
CDCLK_FREQ, because the register is just for earlier HW steppings.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
See the documentation for the DDI_FUNC_CTL register, EDP Input Select
bits: when the EDP input selection is B, the VTOTAL_B must be
programmed with the VTOTAL_EDP value, same thing for selection C.
V2: Use I915_READ as suggested by Daniel Vetter.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Same as the other registers. This one also appeared on Haswell for the
first time, so that's why we are renaming it.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because the PIPECONF register is actually part of the CPU transcoder,
not the CPU pipe.
Ideally we would also rename PIPECONF to TRANSCONF to remind people
that they should use the transcoder instead of the pipe, but let's
keep it like this for now since most Gens still name it PIPECONF.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Because there's one instance of the register per CPU transcoder and
not per CPU pipe. This is another register that appeared for the first
time on Haswell, and even though its Haswell name is
PIPE_DDI_FUNC_CTL, it will be renamed to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL, so let's
just use the new naming scheme before it confuses more people.
Notice that there's a big improvement on intel_ddi_get_hw_state due to
the new TRANSCODER_EDP.
V2: Also rename the register to TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL as suggested by
Damien Lespiau.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This register appeared in Haswell. It does not have an EDP version
because the EDP transcoder is always tied to the DDIA clock. Notice
that if we call PIPE_CLK_SEL(pipe) when pipe is PIPE_A and transcoder
is TRANSCODER_EDP we might introduce a bug, that's why this is a
transcoder register even though it does not have an EDP version.
Even though Haswell names this register PIPE_CLK_SEL, it will be
renamed to TRANS_CLK_SEL in the future, so let's just start using the
real name that makes more sense and avoids misusage.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Before Haswell we used to have the CPU pipes and the PCH transcoders.
We had the same amount of pipes and transcoders, and there was a 1:1
mapping between them. After Haswell what we used to call CPU pipe was
split into CPU pipe and CPU transcoder. So now we have 3 CPU pipes (A,
B and C), 4 CPU transcoders (A, B, C and EDP) and 1 PCH transcoder
(only used for VGA).
For all the outputs except for EDP we have an 1:1 mapping on the CPU
pipes and CPU transcoders, so if you're using CPU pipe A you have to
use CPU transcoder A. When have an eDP output you have to use
transcoder EDP and you can attach this CPU transcoder to any of the 3
CPU pipes. When using VGA you need to select a pair of matching CPU
pipes/transcoders (A/A, B/B, C/C) and you also need to enable/use the
PCH transcoder.
For now we're just creating the cpu_transcoder definitions and setting
cpu_transcoder to TRANSCODER_EDP on DDI eDP code, but none of the
registers was ported to use transcoder instead of pipe. The goal is to
keep the code backwards-compatible since on all cases except when
using eDP we must have pipe == cpu_transcoder.
V2: Comment the haswell_crtc_off chunk, suggested by Damien Lespiau
and Daniel Vetter.
We currently need the haswell_crtc_off chunk because TRANSCODER_EDP
can be used by any CRTC, so when you stop using it you have to stop
saying you're using it, otherwise you may have at some point 2 CRTCs
claiming they're using TRANSCODER_EDP (a disabled CRTC and an enabled
one), then the HW state readout code will get completely confused.
In other words:
Imagine the following case:
xrandr --output eDP1 --auto --crtc 0
xrandr --output eDP1 --off
xrandr --output eDP1 --auto --crtc 2
After the last command you could get a "pipe A assertion failure
(expected off, current on)" because CRTC 0 still claims it's using
TRANSCODER_EDP, so the HW state readout function will read it
(through PIPECONF) and expect it to be off, when it's actually on
because it's being used by CRTC 2.
So when we make "intel_crtc->cpu_transcoder = intel_crtc->pipe" we
make sure we're pointing to our own original CRTC which is certainly
not used by any other CRTC.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
On Ironlake we have one PCH transcoder and FDI per pipe, so we know
that if ironlake_crtc_driving_pch returns false we can disable the PCH
transcoder and we also know that when we disable the crtc we can also
disable the PCH transcoder.
On Haswell there is only 1 PCH transcoder and FDI and they can be used
by any CRTC. So if for one specific crtc haswell_crtc_driving_pch
returns false we can't assert anything about the state of the PCH
transcoder or the FDI link without checking if any other CRTC is using
the PCH.
So on this commit remove the "assert_fdi_{t,r}x_disabled" form
haswell_crtc_enable and also only disable FDI and the PCH transcoder
if the port being disabled was actually a PCH port (we only have one
port using PCH: the VGA port).
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
By forking Ironlake and Haswell functions. The only callers are
{ironlake,haswell}_crtc_enable anyway, and this way we won't need to
add other checks on the Haswell version for the next gens.
V2: Even simpler, as pointed by Jani Nikula.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These functions were forked from their Ironlake versions, so now fix
the gen checks to reflect the fact that they will only run on Haswell.
It is worth noticing that we are not considering IBX/CPT possible on
Haswell anymore. So far on Haswell enablement we kept trying to still
consider IBX/CPT as a possibility with a Haswell CPU, but this was
never tested, I really doubt it will work with the current code and we
don't really have plans to support it. Future patches will remove the
IBX/CPT code from other Haswell functions. Notice that we still have a
WARN on haswell_crtc_mode_set in case we detect non-LPT PCH.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The way we enable and disable the PCH on Haswell changed considerably
since now we have only one PCH transcoder, so we can't keep the same
asserts and we also can't just unconditionally disable the PCH
transcoder for non-PCH outputs. So let's fork a Haswell version.
These new functions look exactly the same as the ironlake versions.
The next patches will introduce the differences.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Identical #define is now available in include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h, nuke the
dupe.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Otherwise dp aux won't work on some hsw platforms, since they use a
different rawclk than the 125MHz clock used thus far.
To absolutely not change anything, round up: That way we get the old
63 divider for the default 125MHz clock.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We need this when the bios forgets even to set that bit up. Most seem
to do that, even when they don't set up anything else in the panel
power sequencer.
Note that on IBX the rawclk is variable according to Bspec, but
everyone is using 125MHz. The rawclk is fixed to 125MHz on CPT, but
luckily we still have the same register available. On hsw, different
variants have different clocks, hence we need to check the register.
Since other pieces are driven by the rawclock, too, keep the little
helper in a central place.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Like we already do for the LVDS panels. This seems to help greatly
in setting up the backlight, since the BIOS might refuse to cooperate.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
v2: Move the backlight_off call from panel_off to edp_backlight_off,
noticed by Paulo Zanoni.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
GART and VRAM size limits need to be a power of two.
Fix values greater than 1GB and simplify those checks a bit.
v2: also fix radeon_vram_limit usage, and simplify test even more.
v3: agd5f: fix spelling as noticed by Klaus Schnass
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Like in the case of native hdmi, which is fixed already in
commit adf00b26d1
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Tue Sep 25 13:23:34 2012 -0300
drm/i915: make sure we write all the DIP data bytes
we need to clear the entire sdvo buffer to avoid upsetting the
display.
Since infoframe buffer writing is now a bit more elaborate, extract it
into it's own function. This will be useful if we ever get around to
properly update the ELD for sdvo. Also #define proper names for the
two buffer indexes with fixed usage.
v2: Cite the right commit above, spotted by Paulo Zanoni.
v3: I'm too stupid to paste the right commit.
v4: Ben Hutchings noticed that I've failed to handle an underflow in
my loop logic, breaking it for i >= length + 8. Since I've just lost C
programmer license, use his solution. Also, make the frustrated 0-base
buffer size a notch more clear.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jürg Billeter <j@bitron.ch>
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25732
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
3 changes:
- If a given value is unset, use the maximal limits from the eDP spec.
- Write back the new values, since otherwise the panel power sequencing
hw will not dtrt.
- Revert the early bail-out in case the register values are unset.
The last change reverts
commit bfa3384a9a
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Tue Apr 10 11:58:04 2012 -0700
drm/i915: check PPS regs for sanity when using eDP
v2:
- Unlock the PP regs as the very first thing. This is a required w/a
for cpu eDP on port A, and generally a good idea.
- Fixup the panel power control port selection bits.
v3: Paulo Zanoni noticed that I've fumbled the computation of the spec
limit values. Fix them up. We've also noticed that the t8/t9 values in
the vbt/bios-programmed pp are much larger than any limits. My guess
is that this is to conceal any backlight enable/disable delays. So by
using the much shorter limits from the spec, which only concerns the
sink, we risk that we might display before the backlight is fully on,
or disable the output while the backlight still has afterglow. I've
figured I don't care too much, since this will only happen when both
the pp regs are not programmed, and the vbt tables don't contain
anything useful.
v4: Don't set the port selection bits on hsw/LPT, they don't exist any
more.
v5: Fixup spelling issues in comments, as noticed by Jesse Barnes.
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Haswell does not have a scaler in the sprite pipeline anymore, so let's
ensure:
1/ We bail out of update_plate() when someone is trying to ask to
display a scaled framebuffer,
2/ We never write to the nonexistent SPR_SCALE register
v2: Smash in the fixup from Damien in the disable_plane function.
Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> (for v1)
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (for v1)
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
... like the comment says. No idea whether this has any effect, but
I guess it's better to not lie to the display by acking a test request
and never following through with it. This goes back to the commit that
originally introduced this code:
commit a60f0e38d7
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date: Thu Oct 20 15:09:17 2011 -0700
drm/i915: add DP test request handling
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Meh'ed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Handle requests that won't fit into a single packet.
v2: pe needs to increase as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Handle requests that won't fit into a single packet.
v2: pe needs to increase as well.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Otherwise the next IB might start reading commands
with the page table still invalid.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <deathsimple@vodafone.de>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
